How Can I Integrate with Dirac Delta in this Expression?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on integrating the expression P(k, w) = A * δ(w-k*v) * f(k, w) using double integration. The integral is defined as I = ∫0∞ dk ∫0∞ P(k,w) dw, which simplifies to I = A ∫∫0∞ δ(w-k*v) * f(k, w) dw dk. The participants clarify that the integration can be performed in either order, emphasizing the importance of the Dirac Delta function in determining the relationship between the variables k and w, specifically that w = k*v. A substitution of u = vk is recommended for clarity in the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac Delta function properties
  • Familiarity with double integration techniques
  • Knowledge of variable substitution in integrals
  • Basic concepts of mathematical functions and their integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Dirac Delta function in detail
  • Learn about variable substitution methods in calculus
  • Explore advanced integration techniques, including Fubini's theorem
  • Practice integrating functions involving Dirac Delta with various examples
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with integrals involving Dirac Delta functions and require a deeper understanding of integration techniques.

Ado
Messages
26
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



I need to integrate this expression :

P(k, w) = A * δ(w-k*v) * f(k, w)

A is constant and δ, Dirac Delta.

Homework Equations


[/B]
There is double integration :

I = ∫0 dk ∫0 P(k,w) dw
= A ∫∫0 δ(w-k*v) * f(k, w) dw dk

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I'm confused with Delta Dirac for calculating this integral.

Let us proceed the w-variable integration firstly. Since the δ-term impose w = k*v, we need to calculate :
0 f(k=w/v, w) dw
But after that, there is no longer any k-dependence...

Of course I'm wrong.. can you explain me how to proceed ??

Thanks in advance !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you could do the integration in either order, ## dk ## or ## d \omega ## first. The delta function should get removed with the first integration, and both methods should give the same answer. When doing the ## dk ## integration first, I believe the factor ## v ## will affect the delta function, and the substitution ## u=vk ## would be useful. ## \\ ## Suggestion: Try something such as ## \int\limits_{0}^{+\infty} \int\limits_{0}^{+\infty} \exp(-\omega^2) \, \delta(\omega-vk) \, d \omega \, dk ##. When you do the ## dk ## integration first, nothing happens to the ## \omega ## in the exponential, since any ## k ## term would get converted, but ## \omega ## terms are unaffected. And yes, to get agreement with the answer where you do the ## d \omega ## first, you need the substitution ## u=vk ## when doing ## dk ## first. With this substitution, ## dk=\frac{du}{v} ##, and the delta function with the ## du ## integration integrates to unity. ## \\ ## The process when the ## d \omega ## integration is performed first is a little more straightforward. ## \\ ## (Note: Here we let ## f(k, \omega)=\exp(-\omega^2) ## with no ## k ## dependence).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
Ado said:

Homework Statement


I need to integrate this expression :
P(k, w) = A * δ(w-k*v) * f(k, w)
A is constant and δ, Dirac Delta.

Homework Equations


There is double integration :
I = ∫0 dk ∫0 P(k,w) dw
= A ∫∫0 δ(w-k*v) * f(k, w) dw dk

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm confused with Delta Dirac for calculating this integral.
Let us proceed the w-variable integration firstly. Since the δ-term impose w = k*v, we need to calculate :
0 f(k=w/v, w) dw
You're forcing w to be a function of k but this is not right. k and w are both variables. Go
I = A ∫ ∫ f(k,w) δ(w - kv) dw dk
Sampling characteristic of the delta function leads to
I = A ∫f(k, w=kv)dk
provided (lower limit of integration) < kv < (upper limit of integration) over w.
 
You are right rude man, thank's for your help :)
 
Ado said:
You are right rude man, thank's for your help :)
Most welcome!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K