How can I reduce a controller with block reduction and find a transfer function?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of reducing a controller using block reduction techniques to derive a transfer function. Participants explore the challenges encountered during this process, particularly when dealing with multiple summations and integrators in the control system.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their attempt to reduce a controller by dividing an outer integrator into two parallel blocks, seeking guidance on how to proceed with block reduction amidst multiple summations.
  • Another participant questions the necessity of using block reduction in a single-loop system, suggesting that combining transfer functions may not be required and pointing out the potential redundancy of a summing junction with a single input.
  • A different participant references applying a specific formula for negative feedback to find the desired transfer function, implying an alternative approach to the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and application of block reduction techniques in the context of the given control system. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing assumptions regarding the structure of the control system, particularly concerning the role of the summing junction and the necessity of block reduction in a single-loop system.

Imagin_e
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
< Mentor Note -- thread moved to HH from the technical forums, so no HH Template is shown >[/color]

Hi!

I've been working on reducing a controller with block reduction in order to understand it and I have trouble to continue since I've stumbled across something that I haven't seen before. My goal is to find a transfer function basically. The block that I reduced looks like this one : https://postimg.org/image/qqfa54ltf/

My attempt now was to reduce the outer integrator, 1/s, by dividing it into two parallell blocks (a rule that I've followed) and continue with the block reduction. Here is what I got after doing this step.
https://postimg.org/image/fkdmoqzpv/

And it is now that I'm lost. I know that I need to reduce the outer loop but I don't know how to do it when we have two summations in row. Anyone that can help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagin_e said:
Hi!

I've been working on reducing a controller with block reduction in order to understand it and I have trouble to continue since I've stumbled across something that I haven't seen before. My goal is to find a transfer function basically. The block that I reduced looks like this one : https://postimg.org/image/qqfa54ltf/

My attempt now was to reduce the outer integrator, 1/s, by dividing it into two parallell blocks (a rule that I've followed) and continue with the block reduction. Here is what I got after doing this step.
https://postimg.org/image/fkdmoqzpv/

And it is now that I'm lost. I know that I need to reduce the outer loop but I don't know how to do it when we have two summations in row. Anyone that can help?
Are these block reduction threads of yours for schoolwork problems? If so, they need to be posted in the Homework Help forum, using the HH Template that you are provided there.
 
berkeman said:
Are these block reduction threads of yours for schoolwork problems? If so, they need to be posted in the Homework Help forum, using the HH Template that you are provided there.
Yes.

Oh, okay. Did not think of that.
 
No worries, I'll move them...
 
At first, there is no need to use the block reduction method because you have already a single-loop system.
Of course, you can combine (multiply) the transfer functions of two succeeding blocks into one single block - but this is not necessary because you must multiply both functions anyway.
Secondly, what is the purpose of the first summing junction? It has only one single input. Did you forget something?
Otherwise you can forget it.
You can find the wanted transfer function simply by applying Black`s famous formula for negative feedback.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K