Use Circuit reduction, voltage and current divider to find i

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a circuit analysis problem involving the calculation of equivalent resistances using circuit reduction techniques, specifically focusing on the arrangement of resistors in parallel and series. Participants are attempting to understand the reasoning behind a specific solution approach presented in a solution sheet.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion regarding the choice of resistors taken in parallel in the solution sheet, specifically questioning why 18 ohms was paired with 9 ohms instead of 6 ohms.
  • One participant suggests an alternative approach of taking 18 ohms in parallel with 6 ohms, followed by finding the total resistance with 9 ohms in series.
  • There is a request for more background information and diagrams to clarify the problem context.
  • Participants note that the values of the resistors are actually in kilo-ohms (18k and 9k), which may have contributed to the misunderstanding.
  • One participant asserts that the 18k resistor is not in parallel with the 6k resistor, challenging the reasoning of another participant.
  • Questions are raised about the equality of voltages across the resistors and the distinction between series and parallel configurations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to the problem. There are competing views on how to analyze the circuit, and some participants express uncertainty about the reasoning behind the solution presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate a lack of clarity due to missing diagrams and background information, which may affect their understanding of the circuit configuration.

Neon32
Messages
68
Reaction score
1
< Mentor Note -- thread moved to HH from the technical physics forums, so no HH Template is shown >[/color]

in the solution sheet, He took the 18 ohms parallel with the 9 ohms and not the 6 ohms. I don't understand why he took this approach. I was going to take 18 ohms parallel with the 6 ohms and find their equivalent resistance then I'll take the result in series with the 9 ohms and find the total resistance of the whole circuit.

https://imgur.com/a/b9UPe
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Neon32 said:
in the solution sheet, He took the 18 ohms parallel with the 9 ohms and not the 6 ohms. I don't understand why he took this approach. I was going to take 18 ohms parallel with the 6 ohms and find their equivalent resistance then I'll take the result in series with the 9 ohms and find the total resistance of the whole circuit.
This looks like homework
more background on the problem would be helpful ... diagrams etc
 
davenn said:
This looks like homework
more background on the problem would be helpful ... diagrams etc
Yes I'm uploading it. give me one minute
 
Neon32 said:
Yes I'm uploading it. give me one minute

OK and you should be posting in the homework section and use the correct template
 
davenn said:
OK and you should be posting in the homework section and use the correct template
it isn't a homework though.
 
it's much preferable to post images in the thread
so they can be referred to easily :smile:

UkKWncb.jpg
 

Attachments

  • UkKWncb.jpg
    UkKWncb.jpg
    58.5 KB · Views: 419
Neon32 said:
He took the 18 ohms parallel with the 9 ohms and not the 6 ohms.
I don't see those on the diagram
 
davenn said:
I don't see those on the diagram

if you take a close look, you would see he took 18 parallel with 9 ohms and found their equivalent resistance.
 
Neon32 said:
if you take a close look, you would see he took 18 parallel with 9 ohms and found their equivalent resistance.

I assume you are referring to the 3rd diagram ?

also' you are misreading

18k = 18,000 Ohms not 18 Ohms
and
9k = 9,000 Ohms not 9 Ohms

OK now that we have that sorted out :smile:

Neon32 said:
and found their equivalent resistance.

yes that's correct and the resulting value will be in series with the 6k Ohms resistor

Neon32 said:
in the solution sheet, He took the 18 ohms parallel with the 9 ohms and not the 6 ohms. I don't understand why he took this approach. I was going to take 18 ohms parallel with the 6 ohms and find their equivalent resistance then I'll take the result in series with the 9 ohms and find the total resistance of the whole circuit.

but the 18k isn't in parallel with the 6k so your reasoning is incorrect
can you see why it isn't ?Dave
 
  • #10
davenn said:
I assume you are referring to the 3rd diagram ?

also' you are misreading

18k = 18,000 Ohms not 18 Ohms
and
9k = 9,000 Ohms not 9 Ohms

OK now that we have that sorted out :smile:
yes that's correct and the resulting value will be in series with the 6k Ohms resistor
but the 18k isn't in parallel with the 6k so your reasoning is incorrect
can you see why it isn't ?Dave

no i don't know why it isn't.
 
  • #11
Neon32 said:
no i don't know why it isn't.
Are the voltages across 18k, 9k and 6k equal?
 
  • #12
Neon32 said:
no i don't know why it isn't.

do you know the difference between series and parallel ?

which do you think it is and why ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K