How can I write the sum of a series in sigma notation and prove it by induction?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing the sum of a series in sigma notation and proving it by induction. The correct formula for the sum of the first n natural numbers is identified as n(n+1)/2, contrary to the user's initial claim of (n^2+n+1)/2. Sigma notation for the sum is expressed as ∑_{i=1}^n a_i, where a_i represents the series terms. The user is advised to demonstrate the original statement's inaccuracy by substituting n=1, which reveals a contradiction. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the correct formula for accurate mathematical proofs.
Seda
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Sigma notation of a series.

I have the formula

1+2+3+...+n = (n^2+n+1)/2,

and I thinkthat this is the formula for the sum of a series. I need to write this thing in sigma notation, and then prove it by induction. I'm usually good and proving things by induction, but I can't even figure out how to get this thing into sigma notation!

I think by pluging in values that this series is 3/2 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + etc

This seems like it should be easy, but wow I have been stumped for awhile. Help is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is how it works formally.

If you are given a list of numbers {a_1, a_2, a_3,..., a_n} and you consider their sum a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_n, then we write this is sigma notation as

\sum_{i=1}^n a_i

This being said, can you answer your question now?
 
And your formula is incorrect by the way. Its \frac{n(n+1)}{2}.
 
Well, that's how the problem was listed in by homework...

hmm, I guess I'll answer it "false" then...
 
I guess if u want extra credit, show the original statement is false, eg if you let n=1, it states 1 = 3/2. Then give them the right expression and then prove that one =]
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K