How can partial fractions be used to solve inverse Laplace transforms?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of partial fractions in solving inverse Laplace transforms, specifically for the expression L-1{(2s²+3)/(s²+3s-4)²}.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to factor the denominator and apply partial fractions but questions the correctness of their approach. Participants raise concerns about the proper method for expanding partial fractions with double roots in the denominator.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the correct approach to partial fraction expansion, particularly in relation to double roots. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to include additional terms in the expansion, but no consensus has been reached on the specific method to apply.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the implications of having double roots in the denominator and how that affects the partial fraction decomposition. The original poster acknowledges potential mistakes and is encouraged to review their notes.

Mark Brewer
Messages
38
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


L-1{(2s2+3)/(s2+3s-4)2}

The Attempt at a Solution


I factored the denominator

f(t)=(2s2+3)/((s-1)(s+4))2

now I've tried partial fractions to get

(2s2+3)/((s-1)(s+4))2 = A/(s-1)2 + B(s+4)2

(2s2+3)=A(s+4)2 + B(s-1)2

by substitution, s=1 and s=-4

5=A(25)
A=1/5

35=B(25)
B=7/5

(1/5) 1/(s-1)2 + (7/5) 1/(s+4)2

At this point I'm not sure if I am on the right track, but I did start to see some identities that may help.

1/5 L-1{1/(s-1)2} +7/5 L-1{1/(s+4)2}

I'm starting to see a pattern for n!\sn+1 and eat

Am I on the right track, or did I go on a tangent?

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to take another look at your partial fraction expansion. How do you expand when you have double roots in the denominator?
 
I'm not sure if splitting the roots, or can I?
 
sorry, I'm not sure if I can split the roots to two rationals.
 
Note, when I say "double roots", I mean, how do you expand into separate terms when, for instance, one of the zeroes of the denominator is squared (or cubed, etc.)?
 
A polynomial would then be formed, right?
 
Mark Brewer said:
A polynomial would then be formed, right?
You may want to look back at your old notes regarding how to expand it using partial fractions. You're missing a couple of terms in your expansion.
 
Okay. Thank you, I'll reply as soon as I see my mistakes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K