The discussion centers around the representation of RMS current as a phasor in AC circuits, exploring the relationship between RMS values, phasors, and the behavior of current and voltage in inductive circuits. Participants examine the implications of using RMS values in phasor notation and the conditions under which these representations are valid.
Participants express differing views on whether RMS current can be considered a phasor. Some assert that it is simply a magnitude, while others suggest that it can be represented in phasor notation under certain conditions. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.
Participants highlight the importance of context and notation when discussing RMS values and phasors, indicating that interpretations may vary based on specific textbooks and conventions.
I'm sorry I mean RMS currect, i'd edited the title and yeah I mean AC circuitdrvrm said:In which type of circuits you have encountered complex voltages...
i think in AC circuits the elements may not dissipate energy but act as storage devices and are related by phase difference, there in the analysis the instant voltages may be complex.
What I'm asking is RMS currect. I know that voltage and currect in AC circuit can be phasor, but why RMS current, which descibe a effective value, can be a phasor? It wouldn't change its value as the time is passing right?Zheng_ said:I
I'm sorry I mean complexcurrect, i'd edited the title and yeah I mean AC circuit
Zheng_ said:What I'm asking is RMS currect. I know that voltage and currect in AC circuit can be complex number, but why RMS current, which descibe a effective value, can be a phasor?
Ok thanksdrvrm said:the phase angle contains z the reactance which is complex
Suppose we have an inductive circuit, and here the voltage and current waves are not in-phase. Whenever a changing voltage is applied to an inductive coil, a “back” e.m.f. is produced by the coil due to its self-inductance. This self-inductance opposes and limits any changes to the current flowing in the coil.Further the effect of this back e.m.f. is that the current wave form reaches its peak value some time after that of the voltage. The current always “lags” behind the voltage .
But..one of the question in my homework let that I rms = 2∠10°?nasu said:But who said that the RMS value of the current is a phasor? You represent the variable quantities (current, voltage) by phasors.
The RMS value is just this, a value. Of course, you can take the magnitude of the phasor representing the current equal to the RMS value.
Same as the magnitude of the velocity vector is equal to the speed. This does not make speed a vector.
Ok thanks. I will go and read through my textbook.nasu said:That may be but it's hard to say what they mean without context. It may be just a notation to say that the magnitude of the phasor is equal to the RMS value and has a phase angle of 10 degrees.
The conventions for notations depend on the specific textbook. Read the chapter about phasors and pay attention to the meanings of the notations.
This tells you the current is i(t) = 2√2⋅sin(ωt+10°)Zheng_ said:But..one of the question in my homework let that I rms = 2∠10°?