Understanding Motor Data Sheets

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsTest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Motor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the Hurst motor data sheet, particularly focusing on the interpretation of the provided electrical parameters such as volts, amps, and watts. Participants explore the implications of these measurements in the context of a 24V BLDC motor, addressing concepts like power factor, RMS values, and the calculations involved in determining power output.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the discrepancy between calculated power (V*I) and the specified watts in the motor data, suggesting a potential non-unity power factor due to inductance.
  • Another participant explains that RMS values are determined through observation over time and can be viewed as the normal operating value.
  • Some participants propose that the system input watts are calculated based on measured volts and currents, factoring in the power factor.
  • There is a discussion about the methods of measurement, including RMS power meters and instantaneous sampling of voltage and current to calculate average power.
  • One participant raises a question about the columns in the motor data, noting instances where watts exceed the product of volts and amps, suggesting efficiency or three-phase power calculations as possible explanations.
  • A participant calculates impedance and power for a three-phase system, finding a close match to the data sheet, but questions the correctness of their approach regarding reactance.
  • Another participant clarifies that the only reactance in an electric motor is inductance, but there is confusion regarding the application of reactance in power calculations.
  • One participant notes that using the angle of impedance in power calculations neglects back EMF, suggesting a need for voltage drop instead of voltage rating in such calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the interpretation of the motor data and the calculations involved, with no consensus reached on the reasons for discrepancies in power calculations or the correct approach to measuring and interpreting the data.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings regarding the definitions of power factor, the role of back EMF in calculations, and the assumptions made about the nature of the electrical signals applied to the motor.

PhysicsTest
Messages
260
Reaction score
27
TL;DR
I am trying to understand the motor data sheet and not clear on the data provided
I am trying to understand the Hurst motor data sheet, but i am not clear on the table provided, please help me to understand the data provided
1604417445990.png


System Input: Volts is all in the range of 24V, so it is 24V BLDC motor, i understand.
Amps: It is the current drawn from the DC source i understand.
Watts: I am having slight confusion here, if i take any value say Load2 Volts = 24.05V and the current is 1.07 amps. Then the Watts or the power input should be V*I = 24.05 * 1.07 = 25.7335 but the value specified is 24.90. Why is this difference?
Motor Data: What exactly is the Motor Data? I assume they are the 3 phase signals we apply to the motor. How the values of Volts(RMS), Amps(RMS) Watts(RMS) are derived?
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
PhysicsTest said:
Then the Watts or the power input should be V*I = 24.05 * 1.07 = 25.7335 but the value specified is 24.90. Why is this difference?
Non-unity power factor because the motor has some inductance, even in the case of nonsinusoidal signals.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Twigg and PhysicsTest
The RMS (root mean square) values and peak values are determined by observation over time under varying conditions ##-## for practical purposes, RMS may be viewed as the normal operating value.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicsTest
So, my understanding is for the system input they measure the input volts and currents and using a tool they calculate the power factor, based on that they arrive at the System input watts. Am I correct? Similarly for the Motor data, they calculate the ##V_{rms}, I_{rms} ## and calculate the output. So it is all measured data.
 
Yes it is probably all measured data. There are many methods of measurement including RMS power meters, and VAR meters.

You can also calculate it if you sample instantaneous voltage and current. At any instant, P=V*I. If you sum many instant samples over a period you can sum them to get average power, avoiding power factor. AC quantities, AC power, reactive power, and power factor are defined for an integer number of whole cycles. But they do not invalidate instantaneous measurements.

To be clear, suppose the signals to the motor are pulses roughly 240 Hertz. If you sample V and I 10000 times per second, calculate P=V*I 10000 times and find the average of those, you get the correct answer for that second.
 
Any ideas about the columns Motor Data; Volts, Amps, Watts?

The last line (and many others) show Watts > V x I.
V= 19.86, I= 7.47
19.86 x 7.47 = 148, but Watts is listed as 171.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara and Guineafowl
Tom.G said:
Any ideas about the columns Motor Data; Volts, Amps, Watts?

The last line (and many others) show Watts > V x I.
V= 19.86, I= 7.47
19.86 x 7.47 = 148, but Watts is listed as 171.
Could this be down to efficiency, or perhaps calculating the motor supply as three phase power?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
I surprised myself by getting the answer for the motor data. Top of the table resistance and inductance is mentioned ##R = 0.57 ; L = 0.64 ##. The impedance is then ##Z = 0.57 +j*0.64##. The angle of impedance is
##\theta = tan^{-1}(\frac{0.64} {0.57}) = 48.3 ##Degrees. The formula for the power of the 3 phase is
##P = \sqrt3 *V_L*I_L*\cos(\phi) ; V_L = 19.86; I_L=7.47 ##. Substituting the values I get ##170.9##, it almost matches with what is mentioned ##171.10##. I hope my calculations are correct?
 
Now i got one confusion, the reactance of inductance is ##X_L = \omega L, Z = R + jX_L##. But i have considered only inductance, is it correct? Please help.
 
  • #10
  • #11
Sorry for the delay, yes i understand that the only reactance is the inductance, but the reactance is given by
##X_L = \omega L## in that case the power calculation does not match with the data sheet, but if i take reactance equal to inductance i.e. ## X_L = L ## then the power data calculation matches with the data sheet. I don't understand what is the mistake.
 
  • #12
PhysicsTest said:
I surprised myself by getting the answer for the motor data. Top of the table resistance and inductance is mentioned ##R = 0.57 ; L = 0.64 ##. The impedance is then ##Z = 0.57 +j*0.64##. The angle of impedance is
##\theta = tan^{-1}(\frac{0.64} {0.57}) = 48.3 ##Degrees. The formula for the power of the 3 phase is
##P = \sqrt3 *V_L*I_L*\cos(\phi) ; V_L = 19.86; I_L=7.47 ##. Substituting the values I get ##170.9##, it almost matches with what is mentioned ##171.10##. I hope my calculations are correct?

the angle of 48.3 degrees should not be used in the calculation of total power, as doing this neglects the existence of back emf of the motor. that 48.3 degrees would be sufficient as power factor in calculating copper losses, but then you'll have to use voltage drop instead of voltage rating in the power calculation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicsTest

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
608
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K