I How Can Two Waves with Different Amplitudes Be in Phase?

AI Thread Summary
Two waves can be in phase despite having different amplitudes because phase relates solely to their timing along the time axis. For example, sine waves can maintain the same phase while differing in amplitude, meaning their peaks and troughs align, even if one wave is scaled vertically. The discussion highlights that amplitude does not affect whether waves are in phase; they are considered in phase if their corresponding points align over time. Additionally, the concept of phase can become complex when considering waves of different frequencies and their combined effects. Visual aids like graphs can enhance understanding of these relationships.
Graffite
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
May I know how is it possible for two waves to be in phase when they have different amplitude? I couldn't find any existing graphs that clearly shows how the two waves are in phase, would anyone be able to sketch it out so I can have a look. Thank you:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Phase refers only to the time axis.
If you plot Sin(x) and 1+2*Sin(x) the waves will still be in phase, but one will be scaled and shifted vertically.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, jbriggs444, hutchphd and 2 others
OHH therefore the nodes of both waves will still be on the same spot, but the wave will be stretched vertically! Thank you
 
Graffite said:
May I know how is it possible for two waves to be in phase when they have different amplitude?
I'm not sure what you mean by waves, nor, for that matter, phase! However, here are
-two sine waves, one with an amplitude 0.7 of the other
-two sine waves, one with an amplitude 0.7 of the other and time shifted by 1 cycle/ 2pi
- a composite wave comprising a fundamental and a third harmonic with an amplitude of 0.3 of the fundamental
- a composite wave with 0.7 times the amplitude of the above and both fundamental and third harmonic time shifted by 1 cycle/2pi
phase.png

If two waves have the same amplitude at all times, they are not just in phase, but are identical.
If two sinewaves are in phase, I can't see where amplitude has any bearing on it.
Maybe two waves of different frequency are sometimes said to be in phase when their combined envelope has a greater amplitude than either wave, or out of phase when the sum is less than either, but I think it is not well defined.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Graffite
Merlin3189 said:
I'm not sure what you mean by waves, nor, for that matter, phase! However, here are
-two sine waves, one with an amplitude 0.7 of the other
-two sine waves, one with an amplitude 0.7 of the other and time shifted by 1 cycle/ 2pi
- a composite wave comprising a fundamental and a third harmonic with an amplitude of 0.3 of the fundamental
- a composite wave with 0.7 times the amplitude of the above and both fundamental and third harmonic time shifted by 1 cycle/2pi
View attachment 325377
If two waves have the same amplitude at all times, they are not just in phase, but are identical.
If two sinewaves are in phase, I can't see where amplitude has any bearing on it.
Maybe two waves of different frequency are sometimes said to be in phase when their combined envelope has a greater amplitude than either wave, or out of phase when the sum is less than either, but I think it is not well defined.
thank you so much it helped me understood a lot!
 
Glad it helped. I always like diagrams and pictures to help me understand.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top