Phase difference between two points in a stationary wave

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phase difference between two points in a stationary wave, particularly focusing on why this phase difference is considered to be zero for points not separated by a node. Participants explore the relationship between stationary waves, simple harmonic motion, and the behavior of points on the wave in terms of their maxima and minima.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that points on a stationary wave between nodes reach their maxima and minima simultaneously, suggesting a phase difference of zero.
  • Others argue that points separated by a node exhibit a phase difference of π (180°), indicating that adjacent points are in antiphase.
  • A participant questions how the phase difference can be zero if the points have different maxima and minima, seeking clarification on the relationship between phase and amplitude.
  • One participant emphasizes that the phase of the resultant wave must remain consistent along the string due to the linear nature of the system, which cannot generate frequencies other than the input frequency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of phase differences in stationary waves. While some agree that points not separated by a node have a phase difference of zero, others highlight the complexity introduced by the presence of nodes and varying amplitudes, leading to unresolved questions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of stationary waves and the conditions under which phase differences are evaluated. Participants do not reach a consensus on how to reconcile the presence of nodes with the concept of phase difference.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and educators in physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics and the properties of stationary waves.

Janiceleong26
Messages
276
Reaction score
4
Q6c)

image.jpg


Why is the phase difference between two points in a stationary wave equals to zero?

I understand that a stationary wave is formed by two progressive waves which have the same amplitude, frequency, wavelength and speed, but traveling in opposite directions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i hope you know that - every point on the string (in case of mechanical waves) is in simple harmonic motion
so for a string in resonance frequency (except fundamental) we have a part of the string moving with phase difference of ∏ (180°) with respect to the one adjacent to it (separated by a node).
 
Janiceleong26 said:
Q6c)

View attachment 86782

Why is the phase difference between two points in a stationary wave equals to zero?

I understand that a stationary wave is formed by two progressive waves which have the same amplitude, frequency, wavelength and speed, but traveling in opposite directions.
Welcome to PF Janiceleong26!

A standing wave with a node at x=0 and wavelength ##\lambda## is described by: ##y = A\sin(\omega t)\sin(2\pi x/\lambda)##. So the points on the standing wave between two nodes are all reaching their maximum and minimum at the same time. But what about points that are separated by a node?

AM
 
Shreyas Samudra said:
i hope you know that - every point on the string (in case of mechanical waves) is in simple harmonic motion
so for a string in resonance frequency (except fundamental) we have a part of the string moving with phase difference of ∏ (180°) with respect to the one adjacent to it (separated by a node).
Shreyas Samudra said:
i hope you know that - every point on the string (in case of mechanical waves) is in simple harmonic motion
so for a string in resonance frequency (except fundamental) we have a part of the string moving with phase difference of ∏ (180°) with respect to the one adjacent to it (separated by a node).

Hi, thank you for your reply.

I've not learn simple harmonic motion yet, but I understand that there is a part on the string moving antiphase to its adjacent part which are both separated by a node.
But how does that link to the phase difference being 0? The points P and Q in the picture attached are not separated by a node.
 
Andrew Mason said:
Welcome to PF Janiceleong26!

A standing wave with a node at x=0 and wavelength ##\lambda## is described by: ##y = A\sin(\omega t)\sin(2\pi x/\lambda)##. So the points on the standing wave between two nodes are all reaching their maximum and minimum at the same time. But what about points that are separated by a node?

AM

Hi, thank you for the warm welcome.

How do the points in between nodes in a stationary wave reach their maximum and minimum at the same time? If you have a visual representation of this it'll be great. Points on a stationary wave is in antiphase with its adjacent part separated by a node. But how does that link to a phase difference of zero?
 
Janiceleong26 said:
Hi, thank you for the warm welcome.

How do the points in between nodes in a stationary wave reach their maximum and minimum at the same time?
Start with: ##y = A\sin(\omega t)\sin(2\pi x/\lambda)##.

When do two points, not separated by a node and having x coordinates x1 and x2 respectively, reach their respective maxima for y? Answer: when ##\sin\omega t## is maximum ie. when ##\sin\omega t## = 1. Similarly, minimas are reached when ##\sin\omega t## = -1 This depends only on time and not on x. So they reach their respective maxima and minima at the same time. (those maxima and minima, of course, will depend on x - for a point (x1,y) the maximum value for y is ##y=A\sin(2\pi x_1/\lambda)## and for (x2,y) the maximum is ##y=A\sin(2\pi x_2/\lambda)##)

If they are separated by a node, what happens?

Points on a stationary wave is in antiphase with its adjacent part separated by a node. But how does that link to a phase difference of zero?
I don't think it does. How are the signs of ##\sin(2\pi x_1/\lambda)## and ##\sin(2\pi x_2/\lambda)## related when there is a node between x1 and x2?

AM
 
Last edited:
Andrew Mason said:
Start with: ##y = A\sin(\omega t)\sin(2\pi x/\lambda)##.

When do two points, not separated by a node and having x coordinates x1 and x2 respectively, reach their respective maxima for y? Answer: when ##\sin\omega t## is maximum ie. when ##\sin\omega t## = 1. Similarly, minimas are reached when ##\sin\omega t## = -1 This depends only on time and not on x. So they reach their respective maxima and minima at the same time. (those maxima and minima, of course, will depend on x - for a point (x1,y) the maximum value for y is ##y=A\sin(2\pi x_1/\lambda)## and for (x2,y) the maximum is ##y=A\sin(2\pi x_2/\lambda)##)

If they are separated by a node, what happens?

Ah I see, thanks. If the two points are separated by a node, then the points will reach their respective maxima / minima at a time difference of half a period, from each other?

So how does it link to question 6c)
This is the answer
IMG_20150806_075734.JPG

Why a phase difference of zero?
 
Last edited:
Janiceleong26 said:
So how does it link to question 6c)
This is the answer
69977-6e850601b84b17145847af4b31af9d4e.jpg

Why a phase difference of zero?
Are the two points P and Q separated by a node?

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
Are the two points P and Q separated by a node?

AM

No, they are not.
 
  • #10
Janiceleong26 said:
No, they are not.
So they reach their maxima and minima at the same time as explained in my post #6 - ie. no phase difference. If they were separated by an odd number of nodes, they would be ##\pi## radians out of phase.

AM
 
  • #11
Andrew Mason said:
So they reach their maxima and minima at the same time as explained in my post #6 - ie. no phase difference. If they were separated by an odd number of nodes, they would be ##\pi## radians out of phase.

AM

I see, thanks. But the two points in the question paper have different maxima / minima.. Do they still reach their respective maxima / minima at the same time too ?
 
  • #12
Janiceleong26 said:
I see, thanks. But the two points in the question paper have different maxima / minima.. Do they still reach their respective maxima / minima at the same time too ?
The maxima and minima will depend on x but they will occur at the same time ie. when ##\sin\omega t## = 1 and -1. See my post #6.

AM
 
  • #13
Andrew Mason said:
The maxima and minima will depend on x but they will occur at the same time ie. when ##\sin\omega t## = 1 and -1. See my post #6.

AM

Got it. Thank you very much !
 
  • #14
I have been searching everywhere for a simple diagram showing the way the phasors of incident and reflected wave but I have failed. What I want (for someone else!) to show is how the incident and reflected waves, starting with the antiphase condition at the reflecting wall . They will cancel. Imagine one phasor pointing up and the other pointing down. Then, as you move away from the wall, a graph of the phasors against distance will show them each rotating at the same rate but in opposite directions, producing a resultant that always lies on a horizontal axis on the phasor diagram. So the resultant standing wave will always have the same frequency and phase, all the way along the string.
But I think there is a more fundamental reason. That is, the system is linear and cannot generate any frequencies other than the input frequency and that applies to spatial as well as temporal variations. Changing the relative phase would have to imply frequency variation and so the phase of the resultant would have to be the same all the way along the string.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Janiceleong26

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K