How can we achieve infinitesimal temperature difference during heat transfer

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around achieving infinitesimal temperature differences during heat transfer, exploring theoretical limits, and the implications of surrounding size on heat transfer processes. Participants examine concepts related to entropy, reversible processes, and the nature of heat flow in thermodynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that achieving infinitesimal temperature differences requires processes to occur in infinitesimal steps, questioning how this can be practically achieved.
  • Others argue that isothermal heat flow with infinitesimal temperature differences is a theoretical limit, suggesting that it cannot be achieved in practice.
  • One participant raises a question regarding the definition of change in entropy of the surroundings, specifically why the heat transfer is equated to reversible heat flow and its relation to the size of the surroundings.
  • Another participant clarifies that the reversible heat flow must be used to calculate entropy change, stating that the size of the surroundings does not affect this calculation.
  • There is a discussion about calculating entropy changes in non-reversible processes and the necessity of using reversible heat flows for accurate calculations.
  • A participant expresses appreciation for the insights provided by another, indicating a positive reception of the technical explanations offered.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit some agreement on the theoretical nature of infinitesimal temperature differences, but there are competing views regarding the implications of surrounding size and the interpretation of entropy changes in reversible versus non-reversible processes. The discussion remains unresolved on certain technical points.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings about the relationship between heat flow and entropy, as well as the definitions used in thermodynamics that may not be universally accepted or understood among participants.

weng cheong
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
let's say heat change between system and surrounding, so the process must occur in infinitesimal steps ie, infinitesimal temperatures here. my problem is, how can we causes that to happen this way? i found some sources saying that, this is due to the large size of the surrounding. How are they related?
 
Science news on Phys.org
weng cheong said:
let's say heat change between system and surrounding, so the process must occur in infinitesimal steps ie, infinitesimal temperatures here. my problem is, how can we causes that to happen this way? i found some sources saying that, this is due to the large size of the surrounding. How are they related?
An isothermal heat flow (infinitessimal temperature difference maintained) cannot be achieved in practice. It is a theoretical limit: a thermodynamic process taking place in a state that is arbitrarily close to equilibrium.

AM
 
but in my textbook, in defining the change in entropy of surrounding,

d Ssurr= Qsurr/Tsurr
= Qreversible/Tsurr


so what i don't understand is that, why it equates Qsurr to Qreversible, in which the transfer of heat is impossible to be reversible? and i can't figure out why it relates this to the fact that the surrounding is huge.
 
weng cheong said:
but in my textbook, in defining the change in entropy of surrounding,

d Ssurr= Qsurr/Tsurr
= Qreversible/Tsurrso what i don't understand is that, why it equates Qsurr to Qreversible, in which the transfer of heat is impossible to be reversible? and i can't figure out why it relates this to the fact that the surrounding is huge.
The reversible heat flow, Qrev, must be used to calculate the change in entropy. This has to do with the way entropy is defined. It is defined that way for a good reason: if it is defined that way, the change in entropy of the system + surroundings is 0 if the process was reversible. It has nothing to do with the fact that the surroundings are huge. The size of the surroundings is immaterial and may not be huge at all (ie. a closed system).

I am not sure I understand your question. In your question you say that Qsurr = Qrev. This is not correct. To calculate the change in entropy of the surroundings, you must use the heat flow in the reversible process between the initial and final states of the surroundings, not the actual heat flow.

But this does not mean that in calculating the change in entropy for a non-reversible process that you will get a 0 change in entropy using the reversible heat flows. You have to calculate the reversible heat flows of the system and of the surroundings separately.

For example, to determine the change in entropy of the universe in an adiabatic free expansion of a gas into a vacuum, you do as follows:

1. calculate the change in entropy of the surroundings. No change in P,V, or T so dS = 0.

2. calculate change in entropy of the gas: change in P and V but no change in T. The reversible process between the initial and final states is a quasi-static isothermal expansion. Since such an expansion does work but results in no change of internal energy (constant T) there must be heat flow into the gas: dQ = 0 + dW = PdV. So in calculating the change in entropy in the reversible process, there is positive heat flow so there is an increase in entropy:

\Delta S = \int dQ_{rev}/T = \int PdV/T = \int nRdV/V = nR\ln\frac{V_f}{V_i}

So, although in this process there is no heat flow at all, there is an increase in entropy since the reversible path between the beginning and end states involves a positive flow of heat.

AM
 
I have to say Andrew Mason is good at this (the tricky bits).
 
i think now i have a better understanding. Thank you =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K