How can we compute expectation values for spin states using Pauli matrices?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating expectation values for spin states using Pauli matrices, specifically focusing on the operators related to spin and their application to the state ##|+z\rangle##. Participants are exploring the computation of expressions involving the operators ##\hat{\mathbb{S}}_+## and ##\hat{\mathbb{S}}_-##.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the computation of expectation values, questioning how to evaluate expressions like ##\langle +z|\hat{\mathbb{S}}_++\hat{\mathbb{S}}_-|+z\rangle## and its implications. There is mention of using vector and matrix representations for clarity.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the computation process, suggesting that the orthogonality of the states ##|+z\rangle## and ##|-z\rangle## leads to a result of zero for certain calculations. Multiple approaches are being explored, including matrix representations and operator manipulations.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment that the complexity of the problem may increase if the spin is not ##1/2##, indicating a potential limitation in the discussion's scope.

Robben
Messages
166
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



When calculating expectation values for spin states I encountered ##\langle \hat{\mathbb{S}}_+\rangle = \langle+z|\hat{\mathbb{S}}_+|+z\rangle = \frac12\langle+z|\hat{\mathbb{S}}_++\hat{\mathbb{S}}_-|+z\rangle.##

How do we compute ##\langle+z|\hat{\mathbb{S}}_++\hat{\mathbb{S}}_-|+z\rangle?##

Also, similary ##\langle+z|\left(\hat{\mathbb{S}}_++\hat{\mathbb{S}}_-\right)^2|+z\rangle?##

Homework Equations



##\hat{\mathbb{S}}_x=\frac12(\hat{\mathbb{S}}_++\hat{\mathbb{S}}_-)##

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that ##\langle+z|\hat{\mathbb{S}}_++\hat{\mathbb{S}}_-|+z\rangle = 0## but I am not sure how to compute it to get zero.

Do I compute ##\left(\hat{\mathbb{S}}_++\hat{\mathbb{S}}_-|+z\rangle\right)## first, which gives ##\hbar|-z\rangle## and then use the bra ##\langle +z|## to get zero?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
One approach, which I think is very pedagogic, is to write everything in terms of vectors and matrices. This can be done in this case because a spin has a finite length, while it would be more difficult for the case of a harmonic oscillator.

For example you can define ##\vert +z \rangle = (1,0)^{T}##, ##\vert -z \rangle = (0,1)^{T}##.
Then you have to express the spin operator in terms of Pauli matrices, and multiply everything.

e.g. ##\langle +z \vert S_z \vert +z \rangle = (1,0) \dfrac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_z (1,0)^{T} = \dfrac{\hbar}{2}##

P.S. note that if your spin is not ##1/2## then it might be tough...
 
Robben said:

Homework Statement


Do I compute ##\left(\hat{\mathbb{S}}_++\hat{\mathbb{S}}_-|+z\rangle\right)## first, which gives ##\hbar|-z\rangle## and then use the bra ##\langle +z|## to get zero?

This is the rigorous way, yes. You get zero because the states ##\vert +z\rangle## and ##\vert -z\rangle## are orthogonal.
 
matteo137 said:
One approach, which I think is very pedagogic, is to write everything in terms of vectors and matrices. This can be done in this case because a spin has a finite length, while it would be more difficult for the case of a harmonic oscillator.

For example you can define ##\vert +z \rangle = (1,0)^{T}##, ##\vert -z \rangle = (0,1)^{T}##.
Then you have to express the spin operator in terms of Pauli matrices, and multiply everything.

e.g. ##\langle +z \vert S_z \vert +z \rangle = (1,0) \dfrac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_z (1,0)^{T} = \dfrac{\hbar}{2}##

P.S. note that if your spin is not ##1/2## then it might be tough...

Thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K