How can we prove ##e^{ln x}= x## and ##e^-{ln(x+1)}= \frac 1 {x+1}##?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the identities ##e^{ln x}= x## and ##e^{-ln(x+1)}= \frac{1}{x+1}##, focusing on the properties of the natural logarithm and the exponential function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of the natural logarithm and its relationship with the exponential function. Some suggest that the proof follows directly from definitions, while others attempt to manipulate the equations to demonstrate the identities.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations of the proofs, with some participants noting that the reasoning appears circular. There is acknowledgment of the definitions involved, but no explicit consensus on the necessity of a formal proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of understanding and clarity regarding the proofs, with some indicating confusion about the steps taken in the reasoning process.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,835
Reaction score
426

Homework Statement


they say 1. ##e^{ln x}= x ## and 2.##e^-{ln(x+1)}= \frac 1 {x+1}## how can we prove this ##e^{ln x}= x ## and also ##e^-{ln(x+1)}= \frac 1 {x+1}##?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


let ## ln x = a## then
##e^a= x,
## a ln e= x,##
→a= x, where
## ln x= x
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Set ##y=ln(x+1)## so we ll have that ##e^y=x+1##.
 
Delta what are you doing?:smile: so?
 
Sorry I now see you have edited the original post.

It is from the definition of the natural logarithm ##lnx## that ##e^{lnx}=x##. So not much to prove here, it follows directly from the definition.

Now we want to look at ##e^{-ln(x+1)}##. This is equal to ##\frac{1}{e^{ln(x+1)}}## don't you agree? (it is like saying that ##e^{-y}=\frac{1}{e^y})##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
Thanks a lot, i was blind but now i see
let ## ln x = y##...1
it follows that ## e^y = x##
taking logs on both sides,
## y ln.e = ln x##
##y = ln x## now substituting this in original equation 1,
##ln x = ln x##,
implying that ##e^{ln x}= x##
greetings from Africa, chikhabi
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
This is correct but what you doing is like driving in a circle, i.e you start from ##lnx=y## to end up with ##y=lnx## which is essentially the same thing.

Substituting ##y=lnx## to ##e^y=x## is what proves (if we can call this a mini proof) that ##e^{lnx}=x##.

Greetings from Athens, Greece.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K