How can we prove that if a sequence is decreasing and has a sum of infinity, then the limit of n times the nth term of the sequence is zero?"

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2015
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for a decreasing sequence of positive real numbers $(a_n)$, if the series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n$ converges, then the limit $\lim_{n\to \infty} na_n = 0$. This conclusion is essential for demonstrating that the series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty (n^{1/n} - 1)$ diverges. The problem was part of the 2015 Problem of the Week, and contributors such as Opalg and anemone provided valuable insights and solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of convergence in series
  • Familiarity with limits and sequences
  • Knowledge of the properties of decreasing sequences
  • Basic calculus concepts, particularly related to infinite series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the limit $\lim_{n\to \infty} na_n = 0$ in detail
  • Explore the divergence of series, particularly the series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty (n^{1/n} - 1)$
  • Investigate the implications of the Cauchy condensation test for series
  • Review the properties of decreasing sequences and their convergence behavior
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and anyone interested in the behavior of infinite series and sequences will benefit from this discussion.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is the first problem for 2015! ______________

Show that if $(a_n)$ is a decreasing sequence of positive real numbers such that $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty a_n$ converges, then $\lim_{n\to \infty} na_n = 0$. As a consequence, prove that the series $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty (n^{1/n} - 1)$ diverges.

______________

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fallen Angel gets honorable mention for correctly answering the second part of the problem. You can find my solution below.

Let $s_n$ be the sequence of partial sums of $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty a_n$. Let $t_n := na_n$. Since $a_n$ is decreasing,

$$s_{2n} - s_n = a_{n+1} + \cdots + a_{2n} \ge na_{2n} = \frac{1}{2}t_{2n}$$

and similarly

$$s_{2n+1} - s_n \ge (n+1)a_{2n+1} = \frac{1}{2}t_{2n+1} - a_{2n+1}.$$

Since $\sum a_n$ converges, $\lim a_n = 0$. Therefore, since $s_n$ converges, the above inequalities imply $\lim_{n\to \infty} t_{2n} = 0 = \lim_{n\to \infty} t_{2n+1}$. Therefore, $\lim_{n\to \infty} t_n = 0$.

In the case of the example, the sequence $a_n := n^{1/n} - 1$ is positive decreasing sequence such that $\lim na_n \neq 0$. Hence, by the theorem, $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty (n^{1/n} - 1)$ diverges.
 
Hi MHB,

I sincerely apologize for overlooking some of the POTW solutions for this week's POTW. Thanks to anemone for notifying me! After reviewing the solutions, I found that Opalg has correctly solved this week's problem. You can read his solution below.
Given $\varepsilon>0$, choose $M$ so that $\sum_{n=M}^\infty a_n <\varepsilon/2$. Then choose $N>M$ so that $n>N\;\Rightarrow\; a_n < \varepsilon/(2M)$. If $n>N$ then $$\begin{aligned} na_n &= Ma_n + (n-M)a_n \\ &< Ma_n + \sum_{r=M+1}^n a_r \\ &< \varepsilon/2 + \varepsilon/2 = \varepsilon . \end{aligned}$$ Since $\varepsilon$ is arbitrary, it follows that $\lim_{n\to\infty}na_n = 0.$

Now let $a_n = n^{1/n} - 1$. This gives a decreasing sequence of real numbers. So if $\sum a_n$ converges then $na_n \to0$ as $n\to\infty.$ But $na_n = f(1/n)$, where $f(x) = \dfrac{\frac1{x^x} - 1}x$, so it would help to know whether $f(x)\to0$ as $x\searrow0$.The function $x^x$ converges to $1$ as $x\searrow0$. Its derivative $(1+\ln x)x^x$ goes to $-\infty$ as $x\searrow0$, so its graph has a vertical tangent at the point $(0,1)$. The reciprocal of this function, $g(x) = 1/x^x$ (with $g(0)=1$), also has a vertical tangent at $(0,1)$. Therefore the Newton quotient $\dfrac{g(x) - g(0)}x$ must go to $+\infty$ as $x\searrow0$. But $\dfrac{g(x) - g(0)}x$ is exactly the expression $f(x) = \dfrac{\frac1{x^x} - 1}x$ from the previous paragraph. Therefore $f(x) \to+\infty$ as $x\searrow0$. So it certainly does not tend to $0$. Conclusion: $\sum a_n$ diverges.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K