How Can We See the Blue Light of Day *Only*?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Islam Hassan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the possibility of perceiving only the blue light of the sky while blocking direct sunlight using a large, opaque disk. Participants consider the conditions necessary for this phenomenon, including the size and elevation of the disk, and the implications of atmospheric scattering on color perception.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a large disk could block direct sunlight while allowing blue light from the sky to be perceived, raising questions about the necessary size and elevation of such a disk.
  • Others argue that during twilight, the light is not solely blue and may not provide the desired effect of illuminating objects in blue light.
  • A participant suggests a practical experiment involving a depression on a hill and an umbrella to test the visibility of blue light, but questions the effectiveness of smaller setups.
  • Some participants mention the influence of human color perception and suggest that a camera might capture the blue light differently than human vision.
  • There is a discussion about the historical context of color perception and atmospheric studies, referencing Ibn al-Haytham's contributions.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for direct sunlight to interfere with the perception of blue light, emphasizing the need for a larger shaded area.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether it is feasible to see only blue light under the proposed conditions. There is no consensus on the effectiveness of the proposed methods or the role of atmospheric scattering in color perception.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the assumptions about color perception, the dependence on environmental conditions, and the unresolved nature of the experimental setups discussed.

Islam Hassan
Messages
237
Reaction score
5
Imagine a very big, opaque planar disk blocking the sun's direct rays which is placed horizontally at a high elevation.

Is it possible that such disk, by blocking the sun's direct rays but allowing the peripheral blue light of the rest of the sky to shine through, would enable us to actually see and bathe in the blue light of day *only*? The disk would have to be very large to exclude direct sunlight impinging too close around the point of observation and drowning out the weaker blue light of the sky (Raleigh scattering light).

Would we be able to see such blue light exclusively, or would direct sunlight (impinging on the ground at a distance) always be too strong and 'drown out' the weaker blue light? At what elevation would such disk have to be placed and how big would it have to be for the blue light to actually be seen?IH
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Islam Hassan said:
Imagine a very big, opaque planar disk blocking the sun's direct rays which is placed horizontally at a high elevation.

Like the moon during an eclipse?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Like the moon during an eclipse?


Yes...except that we want sufficient light to still come through and illuminate the rest of the sky to give us that nice Raleigh scattering blue colour over the portion of sky that is not blotted out by the disk.

A total solar eclipse would cut off substantially all sunlight; we want enough sunlight around the periphery of the disk to give us a blue sky.


IH
 
On a clear day you can see quite well for 20 minutes to half an hour or so after the sun has set (or 20 minutes to half an hour before the sun rises). In some places, you don't legally have to have your headlights on during that half hour or so before sunrise / after sunset -- assuming good weather conditions.

That pre-sunrise / post-sunset lighting comes from sunlight scattered by the atmosphere. There is no twilight on the Moon.
 
D H said:
On a clear day you can see quite well for 20 minutes to half an hour or so after the sun has set (or 20 minutes to half an hour before the sun rises). In some places, you don't legally have to have your headlights on during that half hour or so before sunrise / after sunset -- assuming good weather conditions.

That pre-sunrise / post-sunset lighting comes from sunlight scattered by the atmosphere. There is no twilight on the Moon.

In that case, are you and everything around you illuminated in blue sky light? If you hold up a piece of paper, is it tinged in diffuse blue light? I suspect not...I would imagine you need the full light of day for that effect, hence the big disk to blot out direct sunlight and just let through the blue sky light. Dawn/dusk light may not be strong enough...IH
 
Last edited:
Take a large umbrella and a shovel to the top of the tallest hill in the area. Dig a small depression in the hill deep enough so that the sides block your view of everything but the sky. Now sit inside that depression with a sheet of paper with the umbrella blocking out the Sun and see if the paper looks blue. It probably won't, because there isn't just blue light being scattered, and your color vision isn't solely based on the color of the light, but also of what you expect the color to be based on previous experiences.
 
Islam Hassan said:
In that case, are you and everything around you illuminated in blue sky light?
Artists certainly think so. The French call it l'heure bleue.
Btw, Ibn al-Haytham (965-1040) used the duration of twilight to make the first estimate of the thickness of the atmosphere.
 
Drakkith said:
Take a large umbrella and a shovel to the top of the tallest hill in the area. Dig a small depression in the hill deep enough so that the sides block your view of everything but the sky. Now sit inside that depression with a sheet of paper with the umbrella blocking out the Sun and see if the paper looks blue. It probably won't, because there isn't just blue light being scattered, and your color vision isn't solely based on the color of the light, but also of what you expect the color to be based on previous experiences.

A large umbrella won't do because we will still have direct sunlight impinging on the ground around us and scattering off to the white sheet of paper, most likely drowning out the blue light effect. That is why I propose a very very large shaded area.

Also, what if we forget about human colour vision and take a camera with us instead to take a picture of that white sheet of paper? I would still expect a bluish tinge based on this spectrum of blue sky off the Wiki:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Spectrum_of_blue_sky.svg

The spectrum is most intense (> 2000) from about 475nm to 600nm. Of that:

- the range from 475nm to 525nm is substantially blue light;
- the range from 525nm to 560nm is substantially green light; and
- the range from 560nm to 600nm is substantially yellow light.

Green is close to blue in the way of perception and yellow would tend to shift the first 2 colour bands (475nm-560nm) to greenish-blue. Overall effect as per the Wiki: "The color perceived is similar to that obtained by a monochromatic blue of wavelength 474–476 nm mixed with white light, i.e., an unsaturated blue light."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_scattering

I believe that white light will not appreciably change a given colour's perception. Therefore, I still believe that we should be able to photograph -if not see- that blue(ish) light on earth...IH
 
Last edited:
haruspex said:
Artists certainly think so. The French call it l'heure bleue.
Btw, Ibn al-Haytham (965-1040) used the duration of twilight to make the first estimate of the thickness of the atmosphere.


Thanks for the reference; I have since indeed found several pics of that 'heure bleue', though I suspect many/most have been photoshopped to enhance the blue's appeal...

I wonder though what the effect would be at mid-day with my above experimental set-up...much much stronger I suspect, and quite a spectacle too :smile: ...


IH
 
  • #10
Islam Hassan said:
A large umbrella won't do because we will still have direct sunlight impinging on the ground around us and scattering off to the white sheet of paper, most likely drowning out the blue light effect. That is why I propose a very very large shaded area.

No, that's why you are in a depression on top of a hill. Any ground that could reflect direct sunlight onto you or the paper is shaded by the umbrella.

I believe that white light will not appreciably change a given colour's perception. Therefore, I still believe that we should be able to photograph -if not see- that blue(ish) light on earth...

Perception is a funny thing. There are many factors that determine the perception of color, so I don't think you can claim that adding white light will not change your perception of an objects color. And I can guarantee you that adding white light will change the way a camera sees an object.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K