How can we solve a!b! = a! + b! + c^2 for positive integers a, b, and c?

AI Thread Summary
The equation a!b! = a! + b! + c^2 is being explored for solutions in positive integers a, b, and c. A brute force approach yields a solution of a=2, b=3, c=2, but participants are seeking a more elegant method. There is discussion on how to relate the multiplication of factorials to their sums, suggesting that if a relationship can be established, c would not pose a problem. One participant proposes that c could be expressed as c = √(a!b! - a! - b!). The conversation highlights the challenge of finding a systematic solution to the equation.
msudidi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Given that a, b, and c are positive integers solve the following equation.

a!b! = a! + b! + c^2

anyone?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I found the answer through brute force: a=2, b=3, c=2.

Not sure if there is a more elegant solution though.
 
vorde, thanks for trying, I am getting the same answer too:smile:

but I'm seeking for method to solve it: how to relate multiplication of 2 factorials and their sums? if we can, then c wouldn't be a problem.

there should be a way to solve it:rolleyes:
 
"Brute force" is a method! Please clarify what you are looking for.
 
msudidi said:
Given that a, b, and c are positive integers solve the following equation.

a!b! = a! + b! + c^2

anyone?

Doesn't it work for all positive integers c such that c = \sqrt{a!b! -a! -b!}? :biggrin:

Spit-balling here, we have a!b! = a! + b! + c^2? Doesn't that imply that \displaystyle a! = 1 + \frac{a! + c^2}{b!} = 1 + \frac{a(a-1)(a-2)(a-3)...}{b(b-1)(b-2)...} + \frac{c^2}{b!} = 1 + \prod_{k = (b+1)}^a k + \frac{c^2}{b!}. Don't know where I'm going with that...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top