How Can You Effectively Amplify a 868 MHz Signal for Phase Detection?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on amplifying a 868 MHz signal for phase detection using an Automatic Gain Control (AGC) Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) to maintain a signal level around -20 dBm. The AD8302 phase detector is identified as optimal for this signal level. Participants suggest exploring specialized RF amplifiers from suppliers like Mini-Circuits and consider using a fixed gain amplifier with a variable attenuator. The importance of modulation for reliable signal detection is emphasized, with recommendations for using amplitude modulation (AM) to improve signal integrity over long distances.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 868 MHz RF signal characteristics
  • Familiarity with Automatic Gain Control (AGC) circuits
  • Knowledge of phase detection using the AD8302
  • Experience with RF amplifier selection and design
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Mini-Circuits RF amplifiers suitable for 868 MHz applications
  • Learn about designing AGC circuits for RF signals
  • Investigate the use of amplitude modulation (AM) for signal transmission
  • Explore the implementation of variable attenuators in RF systems
USEFUL FOR

RF engineers, hobbyists working with wireless communication, and anyone involved in signal processing and phase detection applications.

synMehdi
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I have an Antenna that receives signal coming from a wide band of distances, 10-2000 meters from a 10mW transmitter. I am working with 868 MHz band. What is the cheapest method ( or cheapest circuit ) to amplify this signal with an Automatic Gain Control LNA so that the received signal stays around -20dBm no matter how far the receiver is from the transmitter.
I want to input the amplified signal directly in a phase detector like the AD8302 which has the best performance at around -20dBm.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
maybe use an inverting gain amplifier with a pot that responds to voltage, use that for the variable gain. So look into op amps (if you haven't already) and voltage controlled potentiometers.

The amp should be ~$3-5, the fixed resistor should be about 10 cents, and the pot, I'm not sure, but I would think less than $5.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: synMehdi
synMehdi said:
I have an Antenna that receives signal coming from a wide band of distances, 10-2000 meters from a 10mW transmitter. I am working with 868 MHz band. What is the cheapest method ( or cheapest circuit ) to amplify this signal with an Automatic Gain Control LNA so that the received signal stays around -20dBm no matter how far the receiver is from the transmitter.
I want to input the amplified signal directly in a phase detector like the AD8302 which has the best performance at around -20dBm.

BiGyElLoWhAt said:
look into op amps

868MHz is pretty high for an opamp circuit...

Instead, have a look at the amplifiers available from Mini-Circuits and similar suppliers -- http://www.minicircuits.com/homepage/homepage.html

I don't know if they have AGC-type amps available, though. You might consider using a fixed gain amp with a variable attenuator stage after it...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and synMehdi
Is that beyond the response of op amps? Didn't realize that if that's the case.
 
Yeah, standard opamps are usually used in the audio range, and maybe up to 1MHz or so. Especially for low-noise RF gain amps, you usually use specialized amplifier circuits.
 
Thank you for your answers.
Do Automatic Gain Control attenuators exist? Are they a better solution rather than AGC amplifiers? I thought of a log amp but I'm not sure about it, Do they compress the signal Gain?
I thought that the ISM band would have many relatively cheap components and modules, but I can't find anything suited for me.
 
synMehdi said:
10-2000 meters from a 10mW transmitter.

BTW, that is a pretty low power level to be trying to detect at a 2km distance. What is the signal source? What is the modulation?
 
berkeman said:
BTW, that is a pretty low power level to be trying to detect at a 2km distance. What is the signal source? What is the modulation?
My fault, I was not sure about that and I'm new to this. The thing is that I haven't decided the transmitter yet, It will work as a beacon, It won't carry any information so no modulation is applied (?).
 
synMehdi said:
My fault, I was not sure about that and I'm new to this. The thing is that I haven't decided the transmitter yet, It will work as a beacon, It won't carry any information so no modulation is applied (?).

What country are you in? What are the regulations for that 868MHz band? Are you allowed to do a continuous transmission of an unmodulated signal?

BTW, an unmodulated signal will be harder to reliably detect at the receiver. If there is some modulation (even just CW), it makes it easier to pull the signal out of the noise for weak signals...
 
  • #10
I live in France and I'm allowed to use this band and yes it is a Continuous Wave transmission.
Anyways for what I want to use, AM also should work fine because I just want two measure the phase difference ( difference of ToA ) between to antennas.
 
  • #12
synMehdi said:
I live in France and I'm allowed to use this band and yes it is a Continuous Wave transmission.
Anyways for what I want to use, AM also should work fine because I just want two measure the phase difference ( difference of ToA ) between to antennas.
If you are looking for low level signals, you would be far better to use some modulation and then synchronously detect that modulation. It will give much better immunity to interference than just plain Carrier Wave.
Can you use a directional antenna for this? Even if you want an omnidirectional horizontal pattern, you can get some useful gain by using suitable a vertical array. Reliable reception at such a distance with such low transmitter power is quite a tall order. You need all the help you can give it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
774
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K