How Can You Test a Coil for Shorts Without Disassembly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thetexan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coil Test
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods to test a coil in a transformer for shorts without disassembling it. Participants explore various techniques and considerations related to electrical measurements, including resistance and inductance, as well as the implications of different types of shorts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a short between coils may be undetectable due to minimal changes in impedance or inductance, emphasizing the need for known original values for comparison.
  • Another participant proposes measuring no-load current as a method to assess the condition of the transformer, noting that it should not heat up under no load.
  • A different viewpoint mentions that shorts between adjacent turns or layers can lead to heating and damage, suggesting continuity checks for winding-to-winding shorts.
  • One participant introduces the idea of a ring test, which involves using a capacitor in parallel with the coil and observing the oscillation on a scope, although this method is described as somewhat subjective.
  • Another participant argues that intermittent shorts can complicate testing, recommending a full voltage test with no load and monitoring current to identify shorts or insulation damage.
  • It is noted that transformer datasheets may provide DC resistance values, but these may not significantly vary if the short is not a solid connection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the effectiveness of different testing methods, indicating that there is no consensus on a single best approach. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the detection of shorts and the reliability of various measurement techniques.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on known specifications for accurate comparisons and the challenges posed by intermittent shorts, which may not present clear symptoms during testing.

thetexan
Messages
269
Reaction score
13
Let's say a radio power transformer or other electronic transformer (audio for example) has a short between two of its coils (for example, the enamel coating has burnt off). Is there any way to test it to find out without taking it apart?

As I see it the short will be either between adjacent coils or in the coil that is in the row just above or just below. In either case I would think the change in impedance or inductance would be minimal. Plus to check for a change in values would require that you know the original value.

A short to the casing would be easy to check for continuity. But the short between coils I think would be impossible.

Any ideas,

tex
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
thetexan said:
Let's say a radio power transformer or other electronic transformer (audio for example) has a short between two of its coils (for example, the enamel coating has burnt off). Is there any way to test it to find out without taking it apart?

As I see it the short will be either between adjacent coils or in the coil that is in the row just above or just below. In either case I would think the change in impedance or inductance would be minimal. Plus to check for a change in values would require that you know the original value.

A short to the casing would be easy to check for continuity. But the short between coils I think would be impossible.

Any ideas,

tex

You can measure either resistance or inductance. Inductance would be a more sensitive measure, since inductance is proportional to turns^2, and resistance is proportional to the number of turns. But as you say, you need to know the initial value to make a good comparison. Otherwise, you need to know the specification value from the datasheet, as well as the tolerance.

If it's just a single adjacent-winding short, you probably will not be able to detect that (and it shouldn't affect the performance of the transformer much).
 
One can measure how much no-load current it draws. But he needs to know what it should read.

It shouldn't get hot with no load.

Shorts between adjacent turns of a winding will heat those turns and the damage will spread.
Shorts between adjacent layers of a winding will heat more turns and the damage will spread faster.
A winding to winding short will show by continuity checks. I've had transformers that wouldn't work in circuit but on the bench gave correct voltage on each winding...sneaky...

So check by continuity for winding to winding shorts ,
then plug it in and leave it overnight... on something that won't burn.

If you notice that upon removing your ohmmeter lead you get a shock from the transformer's inductive kick, it's probably okay.
 
jim hardy said:
If you notice that upon removing your ohmmeter lead you get a shock from the transformer's inductive kick, it's probably okay.

LOL o0)
 
Doing a ring test can indicate some things. A tank circuit is formed with a capacitor in parallel with the coil and the network is pulsed. The circuit is observed on a scope for a decaying oscillation or something that counts the number of decaying oscillations. It is somewhat subjective but if you have known good parts to compare to or a spec you can usually find problems.
 
Since many coil shorts are intermittent or not a dead / solid short these can be difficult. IMO the best test is a full voltage test with no load - this is easiest usually be energizing the low voltage side with a variable AC source, and an ammeter in series with to measure the current. If there is a short ( or damaged insulation between winding) - the that winding will conduct at some voltage - and the current will increase dramatically.
Some transformer datasheets will list the DC resistance of the windings - it may help, but if the short - is not a great connection you will probably not see the resistance vary much from the datasheet value.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K