How capacitor blocks dc current?

118 replies · 57K views · last reply
samieee
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
hello

Capacitors are widely used in electronic circuits to block the flow of direct current while allowing alternating current to pass,how it does the job?

samieee
 
There is an insulating layer between one part and another of a circuit. Direct current cannot pass through an open circuit, can it?
 
in wiki everything is given but actually nothing is given clearly
 
sophiecentaur said:
There is an insulating layer between one part and another of a circuit. Direct current cannot pass through an open circuit, can it?

well that good but suppose you connect a dc battery,a bulb and a capacitor in a circuit..this time dc current is flowing through the circuit isn't it?(when capacitor become charged if we disconnect the battery then capacitor itself will lighten the bulb)
 
Imagine it with water. A capacitor has capacity. It has two big electron containers.

DC current is just that like a flow of water in one direction. In AC the current it switches direction 50 times a second. So when you put a capacitor in the circuit the electron containers fill and empty periodically. When the electrons flow in one direction for a long time the container gets full and nothing can flow anymore, until the current reverses again.
 
As far as water analogies go, the best one I've heard for a capacitor is a large vessel with a pipe coming out of each end. This vessel is split in the middle with a rubber diaphragm. Make sense now? It isn't a foolproof analogy since you can disconnect the pipes and leak all the water out. But, what analogy is foolproof?
 
samieee said:
in wiki everything is given but actually nothing is given clearly

Then I'll try this. Just as V=IR is the fundamental equation relating voltage, current and resistance for a resistor circuit, the following equation relates voltace, current and capacitance for a capacitor:

[tex]I(t) = C \frac{dV(t)}{dt}[/tex]

Or, if you are not familiar with that calculus term with the derivative, you can think of it as:

I(t) = C * (change of voltage per time)

So when you have DC, there is no change of voltage with respect to time, so there is zero current. When you have an AC voltage signal that varies across the capacitor with time, that equation let's you calculate the current that results through the capacitor.
 
And how does a paralle plate capacitor actually 'store charge'. The first thing you need to remember is that there an awful lot of electrons available for conduction in a conductor. Only a tiny percentage of the electrons, moving a tiny bit, corresponds to a huge charge. As one plate charges up relative to the other you get a build up of electrons on and near the surface of the negatively charged plate and a corresponding reduction in the number of electrons on or near the surface of the positive plate. The displacement will continue until the field due to the supply voltage is balanced out by the local fields of attraction and repulsion due to the imbalance in the number of protons and electrons. on the plates. The closer you put the plates, the higher the field between them (volts per metre) so the bigger volume of electrons that are displaced (the greater the charge and the greater the Capacitance). If a dielectric (an insulator) is put in between, the molecules of the insulator will become polarised by the field and this will lead to more electrons being displaced in the metal plates - just as if the spacing were much less but without the danger of a current flowing.
The higher the PD, the more charge is displaced and it is a linear relationship - like Ohm's Law.

Q = CV is the basic relationship so you can say
dQ/dt = C dV/dt .
But I = dQ/dt
Which shows why I= C dV/dt (as in the above post)
Hence, the Current is proportional the rate of change of the PD.
 
Two circuit diagrams of a capacitor in series with a wire: top shows a flat horizontal red line stopping at the plate, bottom shows a red sine-like wave passing through the capacitor gap.


DC is stopped, AC passes through.
 
Last edited:
samieee said:
well that good but suppose you connect a dc battery,a bulb and a capacitor in a circuit..this time dc current is flowing through the circuit isn't it?(when capacitor become charged if we disconnect the battery then capacitor itself will lighten the bulb)
Just a point. The current is Unidirectional, maybe but it is not DC because its value is varying in time (exponentially).
 
Borek said:
Two circuit diagrams of a capacitor symbol: top shows a red flat line on the left lead, bottom shows a red sine-like wave on the left lead, with the right lead flat at zero.


DC is stopped, AC passes through.
You're fired.
 
Hello everyone, I apologize if I revived an old thread.

I read all above posts and I understand why capacitors do not allow DC current. However, I suspect if there is any difference if the capacitors are connected in parallel. Do they allow DC current and block AC current in this case?

Thank you.
 
LovePhys said:
Hello everyone, I apologize if I revived an old thread.

I read all above posts and I understand why capacitors do not allow DC current. However, I suspect if there is any difference if the capacitors are connected in parallel. Do they allow DC current and block AC current in this case?

Thank you.

makes no difference, there is still a hole (gap) in the circuit that DC cannot cross
and AC will still flow in a circuit with multiple parallel capacitors

Circuit schematic of a single capacitor symbol above three capacitor symbols connected in parallel between two common wires.




Dave
 
Attachments
  • Circuit schematic of a single capacitor drawn above three identical capacitors wired in parallel between two common nodes, with the parallel group connected to a horizontal line on each side.
    caps.GIF
    771 bytes · Views: 5,225
If AC didnt flow in a circuit with multiple capacitors in parallel then we would have a huge problem trying to smooth DC lines of power supplies either in a power supply itself or on a power rail in something like a radio transmitter, where we use different value capacitors in parallel to deal with AC signals of varying frequencies. Here is an example from a synthesiser I have ...

Schematic excerpt of a synthesiser supply: VCC1 PG-2 rail feeds R14 and R15 (180 ohm) to pin 16 and 15 of U3 LMZX2326/SO, with C23 22u, C10 100n and C9 1n decoupling capacitors to ground.


note the very different values of C9, 10 and C23 off the VCC1 rail


cheers
Dave
 
Attachments
  • Schematic excerpt of a synthesiser supply: VCC1 PG-2 rail feeds R14 and R15 (180 ohm) to chip U3 (LMZX2326/SO), with capacitors C23 (22u, electrolytic), C10 (100n) and C9 (1n) decoupling the rail to ground.
    caps in parallel.GIF
    3 KB · Views: 5,160
Yes, thank you very much Dave! You cleared the point. My teacher said that the capacitors blocked the DC current if they were connect in series, but if they were in parallel, they allowed the DC current. But I do not agree with him. (By the way, I do not really understand your circuit. I am in year 11, so it seems to be beyond my level).

Also, If I have an input voltage like this:
Graph of V_IN (V) against time (s): a pulse waveform that is 0 V from O to 1.0 s, rises to 1.0 V, stays at 1.0 V until 2.0 s, drops to 0 V, and rises again to 1.0 V at 3.0 s.


I think this is a DC current, right? Since it only has positive values of V.
Normally, the capacitor will block the DC current. However, in this case, I think because the DC signal varies with time, so when the voltage is 0, it will give time for the capacitor to discharge. So, the graph for the capacitor will look like:

Graph of V_OUT (V) against time (s) for a capacitor circuit: a solid curve rises from 0 at 1.0 s to about 1.0 V at 2.0 s, then falls back to 0 at 3.0 s, with a dashed square-wave input between 0 and 1.0 V overlaid.

Please correct me if I am wrong at this point. Thank you!
 
Attachments
  • Graph of V_IN (V) against time (s): a square pulse train, 0 V until 1.0 s, 1.0 V from 1.0 s to 2.0 s, 0 V from 2.0 s to 3.0 s, then 1.0 V from 3.0 s onward.
    Untitled.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 5,125
  • Graph of VOUT (V) against time (s): output rises from 0 at 1.0 s to 1.0 V at 2.0 s, then falls back to 0 at 3.0 s, with a dashed square-wave input overlaid at 1.0 V between 1.0 s and 2.0 s and again from 3.0 s.
    Untitled 2.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 5,203
LovePhys said:
Yes, thank you very much Dave! You cleared the point. My teacher said that the capacitors blocked the DC current if they were connect in series, but if they were in parallel, they allowed the DC current. But I do not agree with him. (By the way, I do not really understand your circuit. I am in year 11, so it seems to be beyond my level).

thats ok you are doing great for 11 yo :) yes its just a small part of a complex circuit. The main thing I wanted to show you was the 3 capacitors that were in parallel ( C9,10 and 23) and how their values were quite different. This allows for filtering of frequencies across a wide range.

Also, If I have an input voltage like this:
Graph of V_IN (V) against time (s): a square wave that is 0 V until 1.0 s, rises to 1.0 V, stays there until 2.0 s, drops back to 0 V, and rises again to 1.0 V at 3.0 s.


I think this is a DC current, right? Since it only has positive values of V.
Normally, the capacitor will block the DC current. However, in this case, I think because the DC signal varies with time, so when the voltage is 0, it will give time for the capacitor to discharge. So, the graph for the capacitor will look like:

Graph of V_OUT (V) against time (s): a dashed square wave switches between 0 and 1.0 V at 1.0 s, 2.0 s and 3.0 s, while a solid curve rises towards 1.0 V then decays back towards 0 V in response.

Please correct me if I am wrong at this point. Thank you!

the top image is not a steady DC voltage, as you can see its changing from 0V to 1 V
it is what is called a square wave. It is 1 second bursts of a DC voltage. You will mainly see square waves in digital circuits like computers etc. If it was a plain DC voltage then it wouldn't be varying from that 1V level with time.
Yes the lower diagram shows how the voltage across the capacitor would vary with a square wave applied

cheers
Dave
 
Thank you Dave, I get what you say!

I just have one more question: Does the same thing happen to half-wave rectifiers with smoothing capacitors? I think that things will happen in this order: AC current (sine wave) => (diode) => varying DC current (positive voltages only) => Capacitor charges then discharges (this process is repeated several times). So in this case, we still have capacitors that conduct varying DC current.

And if we have a smoothing capacitor in a half-wave rectifier (in the picture below). Does the red "line" (I mean the part that is going down when the capacitor is discharging) a curve or a straight line? I was told by my teacher that it was a curve (just like the graph of a discharging capacitor), but it seems to be a straight line to me!?

Graph of Vout against t for a smoothed half-wave rectifier: a red capacitor voltage curve rises and decays in repeating ripples above grey dotted rectified waveform humps that drop to zero.


Thank you!
 
Attachments
  • Graph of Vout against t showing a red capacitor voltage curve rising sharply then decaying slowly in a series of ripples, above grey dotted rectified half-sine humps dropping to zero.
    2_16_0_12_eng.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 5,337
Last edited:
now that pic shows a full wave rectifier. You can see how the capacitor voltage 'sags' drops between the pulses of voltage from the rectifiers, but it keeps the overall voltage at a higher level and smoother than if it wasnt connected across the rectifier output.

have a look at these pics...

Three stacked waveform plots: AC voltage as a full sine wave, 1/2 wave rectification with only positive half-cycles and gaps, and full wave rectification with all half-cycles shown as positive humps.


the top image is the AC Voltage
the middle image is a 1/2 wave rectified AC Voltage it only uses 1 diode. See the big gaps where the other half of the AC sine wave isn't being rectified.
the lower image is a full wave rectified AC Voltage
All of these are without a capacitor.

adding a capacitor to the output of the full wave rectifier gives the waveform shown as the red wavey line in your image. The difference in the Voltage between the lowest part of that red line and the top of it is what we call the "Ripple Voltage".
In a power supply we aim to get the ripple voltage as low (small) as possible. It would depend on the requirements of the power supply but a value of less than 100mV (milliVolts) would be good.

below are images of a half wave and a full wave rectifier...

Circuit schematic of a half-wave rectifier: a transformer secondary feeds one diode in series, with load resistor R_L on the output side and a ground symbol at the bottom.


half wave = just one diode


Circuit schematic of a full-wave bridge rectifier with four diodes, a transformer secondary on the left, a centre tap to ground, and a load resistor RL on the right.


Full wave = 2 diodes


Circuit schematic of a full-wave bridge rectifier: a transformer secondary feeds four diodes, with a load resistor R_L on the output side.


and this last image is a full wave of 4 diodes commonly known as a Bridge Rectifier

cheers
Dave
 
Attachments
  • Circuit schematic of a full-wave bridge rectifier with four diodes fed from a transformer secondary, a centre-tapped connection to ground, and a load resistor labelled RL on the output side.
    rectifier_full_wave.gif
    993 bytes · Views: 1,158
  • Schematic of a full-wave bridge rectifier: a transformer secondary feeds four diodes, with output across load resistor R_L.
    rectifier_bridge.gif
    1.8 KB · Views: 1,008
  • Schematic of a half-wave rectifier: a transformer secondary feeds a single diode in series with a load resistor labelled R_L, with a ground connection at the bottom.
    rectifier_half_wave.gif
    825 bytes · Views: 1,021
Last edited:
Thank you Dave, and sorry since I posted the wrong graph!

I found this equation on the hyperphysics: [itex]V_{C}=V_{0}e^{-t/RC}[/itex]. This equation proves that the graph of a discharging capacitor will be an exponential curve. I still don't know why the red discharging lines of the full-wave rectifier with smoothing capacitor still look like a straight line (even in my textbook, I have the same feeling that they are straight lines)!?
 
the image showing the red line is ok. It gives you a really good indication of what is happening in the rectifier circuit with a capacitor. If the capacitor is too lower value then the voltage will sag lower before the capacitor recharges with the next peak.
If the capacitor value is increased, then the voltage drop across the capacitor won't be so much between peaks.

Dave
 
LovePhys said:
Thank you Dave, and sorry since I posted the wrong graph!

I found this equation on the hyperphysics: [itex]V_{C}=V_{0}e^{-t/RC}[/itex]. This equation proves that the graph of a discharging capacitor will be an exponential curve. I still don't know why the red discharging lines of the full-wave rectifier with smoothing capacitor still look like a straight line (even in my textbook, I have the same feeling that they are straight lines)!?

Those lines 'look' straight because they are part of what would be a very long RC discharge curve. If the AC were turned off then you would see the discharge happen over a large number of AC cycles and the line would no longer look straight.
The rate of decay depends upon the resistance of the load and the value of Capacitor, in practice, is chosen to give an acceptable 'ripple'. On the charging half of each cycle, the source series resistance is low enough (normally) for the rising voltage curve to follow the emf with little reduction but the 'off-load' wavefrom (i.e. infinite load R) would be a straight horizontal line with a value equal to the source emf.
It may be worth pointing out that for some applications (like battery charging or DC motor drive, for instance) there is no point in having a smoothing capacitor because the load in 'only interested' in the total charge it gets over the cycle.
 
Thank you sophiecentaur, but I don't understand this part of your post.

sophiecentaur said:
but the 'off-load' wavefrom (i.e. infinite load R) would be a straight horizontal line with a value equal to the source emf.
It may be worth pointing out that for some applications (like battery charging or DC motor drive, for instance) there is no point in having a smoothing capacitor because the load in 'only interested' in the total charge it gets over the cycle.

Can you please explain a little bit?
Thank you! I have learned so many things!
 
LovePhys said:
Thank you sophiecentaur, but I don't understand this part of your post.



Can you please explain a little bit?
Thank you! I have learned so many things!

OK
Firstly, if the load has infinite resistance (no load) the capacitor will just charge up and hold a DC value.
Secondly, a battery just needs charge (it behaves, on its own, rather like a huge value capacitor) there is no point in 'smoothing' the waveform supplied to it. It will allow current to flow in it as long as the voltage of the source is greater than the emf of the battery. Same thing for a motor: charge will flow through it for positive volts applied. There is no real advantage in smoothing the supply for it - in the end, in both these cases, the limit to how much useful charge can flow from the rectifier circuit will depend upon the total source (series) resistance (that will depend upon the rating of the transformer and even the AC supply to the primary of the transformer). If you have an inadequate transformer then no amount of smoothing can keep the volts up if your load resistance is too low. Many audio power amplifiers can suffer when they are required to supply sustained 'loud' passages, particularly with LF content - a cheap PSU 'sags' when too much current has been demanded.
 
LovePhys said:
Thank you sophiecentaur, but I don't understand this part of your post.



Can you please explain a little bit?
Thank you! I have learned so many things!

He says it would be a straight line because R in the off-load (or "no-load") case would be infinite, and e to the 0 is 1. So it wouldn't decay. The other part of what he said means that in some applications (like battery charges) the actual value of the V doesn't need to stay stable, as it is the total charge transferred that is important. In other case, such as powering logic circuits, the stability of the voltage *is* important and in this case a smoothing capacitor would be required.
 
the way I think about it, is two black boxes, which ever has a higher voltage will send current to the other, a capacitor doesn't block DC until it is charged, in which case there is no difference in potential for current to flow? But, in AC, as the capacitor is charged, the source voltage is decreasing behind it so it begins to discharge into the circuit (reactance) and later, recharge.

One can see from this explanation how reactance is frequency dependent..