The discussion centers around the nature of the cathode in a voltaic cell, specifically addressing why it is considered positively charged despite being the site of reduction where electrons are gained from the anode. Participants explore concepts related to electrical neutrality, potential differences, and the conventions used in describing electrode behavior.
Participants express differing views on the nature of the cathode's charge and the conventions used to describe electrode behavior. There is no consensus on the interpretation of potential differences or the implications of oxidation versus reduction potential.
Participants highlight the importance of context when discussing potential differences, noting that without a reference point, terms like "higher potential" can be ambiguous. The discussion also touches on the complexity of charge carrier movement, which may depend on various factors beyond simple electric fields.
Drakkith said:I'm sorry but this is just wrong.
They don't. Electrons have a negative charge, protons have a positive charge, and neutrons are electrically neutral. You're replying to a bad answer.
The electrons that flow into the cathode are used in the chemical reaction between the cathode and the electrolyte. They are indeed 'lost' from the cathode in this reaction.
proton007007 said:The cathode is not charged