How cathode is positively charged in voltaic cell?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of the cathode in a voltaic cell, specifically addressing why it is considered positively charged despite being the site of reduction where electrons are gained from the anode. Participants explore concepts related to electrical neutrality, potential differences, and the conventions used in describing electrode behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why the cathode is considered positively charged when it gains electrons from the anode during reduction.
  • Others argue that the cathode is not positively charged in an absolute sense, suggesting that everything in nature is electrically neutral and that the terms are used for conceptual clarity.
  • A participant introduces the idea that the cathode can be viewed as an electron source in the context of its function within the cell.
  • There is a discussion about the potential of the cathode being higher than that of the anode, with some participants seeking clarification on what "higher potential" means in this context.
  • Some participants note that the potential energy of electrons at the cathode is higher than that of oxidized species approaching it, while others question how this relates to the materials of the electrodes.
  • There is a mention of the arbitrary nature of choosing to consider reduction potential over oxidation potential, with participants discussing the implications of this choice on the understanding of electron flow.
  • Participants explore the role of ions in completing the circuit via a salt bridge, with some clarifying that charge carriers can move due to factors beyond electric fields, such as density gradients.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the cathode's charge and the conventions used to describe electrode behavior. There is no consensus on the interpretation of potential differences or the implications of oxidation versus reduction potential.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of context when discussing potential differences, noting that without a reference point, terms like "higher potential" can be ambiguous. The discussion also touches on the complexity of charge carrier movement, which may depend on various factors beyond simple electric fields.

  • #31
Yes, if you have a salt bridge, both cations and anions will contribute to the current. The precise extent of current carried by anions and cations depends on their respective mobility.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #32
DrDu said:
Yes, if you have a salt bridge, both cations and anions will contribute to the current. The precise extent of current carried by anions and cations depends on their respective mobility.
You mean as we have studied protons do not produce current but electrons do,is it not true for ions?I mean do cations also produce current?What's the direction of the current produced by ions?In the direction of anions flow or cations flow?
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Who sais that protons don't carry current? In solution, protons have the highest mobility of all charge carriers. Anions moving in the same direction as electrons will prduce a current of the same sign, while cations moving in the same direction as electrons will produce a current in the other direction. In a salt bridge, anions and cations move in different directions (anions moving to the + pole, cations to the - pole), hence the sign of the current carried by them is the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #34
DrDu said:
Who sais that protons don't carry current?
In our class we have been told that it was a misconception that flow of proton produces current it was later learned but convention was not changed so still current direction is indicated by direction of proton (opposite of direction of flow of electrons).
 
  • #35
At the time the direction of current and the + and - were fixed, people had no idea about the existence of electrons and protons. So nobody ever claimed that the current in a wire were due to protons. Anyhow, that the current in a wire is carried by electrons does not mean that cations can't move (and can be the main charge carriers) in other media.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #37
DrDu said:
Anyhow, that the current in a wire is carried by electrons does not mean that cations can't move (and can be the main charge carriers) in other media.
I got your point.
 
  • #38
DrDu said:
In solution, protons have the highest mobility of all charge carriers.
Is current due to positive charges only possible in solutions?If not,what are the other examples of current because of positive charges?
 
  • #39
gracy said:
what are the other examples of current because of positive charges?

Electron holes in semiconductors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #41
I have one more doubt .Sometimes it is said that cations of inert electrolytes of salt bridge go to cathode half cell and anions of inert electrolyte travel into anode half cell to balance the charge imbalance produced in them.Is it right?
 
  • #42
Sodium doped alumina. Glas, e.g. in ph electrodes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #43
gracy said:
I have one more doubt .Sometimes it is said that cations of inert electrolytes of salt bridge go to cathode half cell and anions of inert electrolyte travel into anode half cell to balance the charge imbalance produced in them.Is it right?
Depends on whether you are talking about electrolysis or a galvanic cell.
 
  • #44
gracy said:
Sometimes it is said that cations of inert electrolytes of salt bridge go to cathode half cell and anions of inert electrolyte travel into anode half cell to balance the charge imbalance produced in them.Is it right?
This condition is seen in electrolytic cell,right?But why electrolytic cell needs salt bridge?
 
Last edited:
  • #45
Yes, this is right both for electrolytic and Galvanic cells. You are right that not all electrolytic cells need a salt bridge or thelike. The copper rafination I mentioned earlier is a counter example. On the other hand, if you take two half cells, e.g. Cu/Cu2+ and Zn/Zn2+ with a salt bridge, you can operate it both as a Galvanic and an electrolytic cell. With the now generally accepted convention of anode and cathode, cations will allways wander to the cathode, anions to the anode.
 
  • #46
I want to know which of these is correct
Cations and anions from oxidation and reduction half cell respectively move through the salt bridge into reduction an oxidation half cell and inert electrolyte present in salt bridge is just to provide conducting medium
OR
The inert electrolyte present in salt bridge dissociates into cations and anions and travel into the reduction and oxidation half cell respectively.For eg.KNO3 will dissociate int K+ and NO3- ions ,K+will go in reduction half cell to balance excessive negative charge and NO3- would go in oxidation half cell to balance excessive positive charge .
 
  • #47
The second option is correct, although ions from the half cells will also enter into the salt bridge.
 
  • #48
DrDu said:
ions from the half cells will also enter into the salt bridge.
Both of the processes will occur simultaneously ,the one i have mentioned in first option is to complete the circuit, and the second one to maintain neutrality ,right?
 
  • #49
The last doubt about salt bridge is
In my textbook it is written that salt bridge prevents the mechanical mixing of the solution.what it means?
 
  • #50
gracy said:
textbook it is written that salt bridge prevents the mechanical mixing of the solution
Very little, really. All a salt bridge accomplishes is that it slows the mixing of different solutions in two half cells.

Couple general remarks: electrochemical/electrolytic cells are used for batteries, either disposable or rechargeable, as sources of electric power; for electrolytic refining/production of metals or other chemicals (Cu, Al, Cl, Na, others); or, they are used for laboratory measurements of free energy, and analytical applications. I'm not aware that any textbook explicitly states that there are these three general areas of applications.

Salt bridges are used in laboratory applications, that is for cells that do no electrical work, nor have any electrical work done on them. One might be interested in comparing the concentrations of two different solutions of ferrous sulfate, for example, and it is necessary to prevent the solutions from mixing over the time frame of the measurement. Mixing is prevented by use of the salt bridge which allows for ionic current from a solution in one half cell (Fe/Fe+2) at one concentration to the second half cell (Fe/Fe+2) at a different concentration without the two solutions mixing or diffusing into one another and reducing the potential difference between the two half cells to zero before the measurement can be accomplished. Check the index in the textbook for "concentration cells."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy and DrDu
  • #51
Is my 48th post,correct?
 
  • #52
Bystander said:
Salt bridges are used in laboratory applications, that is for cells that do no electrical work, nor have any electrical work done on them. One might be interested in comparing the concentrations of two different solutions of ferrous sulfate, for example, and it is necessary to prevent the solutions from mixing over the time frame of the measurement. Mixing is prevented by use of the salt bridge which allows for ionic current from a solution in one half cell (Fe/Fe+2) at one concentration to the second half cell (Fe/Fe+2) at a different concentration without the two solutions mixing or diffusing into one another and reducing the potential difference between the two half cells to zero before the measurement can be accomplished. Check the index in the textbook for "concentration cells."
But according to the video I have seen on concentration cell ,electrons are transferred not the ions.This is the video i am talking about
 
  • #53
Bystander said:
Mixing is prevented by use of the salt bridge which allows for ionic current from a solution in one half cell (Fe/Fe+2) at one concentration to the second half cell (Fe/Fe+2) at a different concentration without the two solutions mixing or diffusing into one another
What is mixing of solutions then?I thought that if ions of one half cell travel to second half cell ,it is said that solutions are mixed.
 
  • #54
gracy said:
,electrons are transferred not the ions.
This is in the external circuit. The part of the circuit where chemistry is happening carries current in one, or both, directions by ion transport.
gracy said:
Both of the processes will occur simultaneously ,the one i have mentioned in first option is to complete the circuit, and the second one to maintain neutrality ,right?
Yes.
gracy said:
I thought that if ions of one half cell travel to second half cell ,it is said that solutions are mixed.
Any transfer of solute, ions, solvent, from one half cell to the other is "mixing." The idea behind the salt bridge is that the ion transfer is insignificant over the course of a measurement due to difficulty of diffusion through the salt bridge, or that the actual ion transport carrying the current involves the ions of the salt bridge, and that the salt be chosen to minimally interfere with the chemistry being measured/studied.
 
  • #55
Bystander said:
The idea behind the salt bridge is that the ion transfer is insignificant over the course of a measurement due to difficulty of diffusion through the salt bridge,
Only sufficient enough to complete the circuit?
 
  • #56
gracy said:
sufficient enough to complete the circuit?
Yes.
 
  • #57
Bystander said:
that the actual ion transport carrying the current involves the ions of the salt bridge,
Ions of salt bridge also produce current?I thought they are only to maintain neutrality .
 
  • #58
gracy said:
Ions of salt bridge also produce carry current?
For every cation reduced at the cathode, to maintain neutrality, cation(s) must move through the salt bridge (carrying charge/current).
 
  • #59
Bystander said:
For every cation reduced at the cathode, to maintain neutrality, cation(s) must move through the salt bridge (carrying charge/current).
But at the same time For every anion oxidized at the anode, to maintain neutrality, anions must move through the salt bridge (carrying charge/current)Won't it cancel the current produced by cations of salt bridge?
 
  • #60
gracy said:
Won't it cancel the current produced by cations of salt bridge?
The two contributions are NOT necessarily equal. If you look at current through a Cu/Cu+2//Cu+2/Cu cell for refining/producing electrolytic copper, almost all the current carried through the cell is by Cu+2 ions. There is very little transport by SO4-2 ions which more or less maintain the electrical neutrality by playing "hot potato" or passing Cu+2 ions from one to another.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K