How cathode is positively charged in voltaic cell?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of the cathode in a voltaic cell, specifically addressing why it is considered positively charged despite being the site of reduction where electrons are gained from the anode. Participants explore concepts related to electrical neutrality, potential differences, and the conventions used in describing electrode behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why the cathode is considered positively charged when it gains electrons from the anode during reduction.
  • Others argue that the cathode is not positively charged in an absolute sense, suggesting that everything in nature is electrically neutral and that the terms are used for conceptual clarity.
  • A participant introduces the idea that the cathode can be viewed as an electron source in the context of its function within the cell.
  • There is a discussion about the potential of the cathode being higher than that of the anode, with some participants seeking clarification on what "higher potential" means in this context.
  • Some participants note that the potential energy of electrons at the cathode is higher than that of oxidized species approaching it, while others question how this relates to the materials of the electrodes.
  • There is a mention of the arbitrary nature of choosing to consider reduction potential over oxidation potential, with participants discussing the implications of this choice on the understanding of electron flow.
  • Participants explore the role of ions in completing the circuit via a salt bridge, with some clarifying that charge carriers can move due to factors beyond electric fields, such as density gradients.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the cathode's charge and the conventions used to describe electrode behavior. There is no consensus on the interpretation of potential differences or the implications of oxidation versus reduction potential.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of context when discussing potential differences, noting that without a reference point, terms like "higher potential" can be ambiguous. The discussion also touches on the complexity of charge carrier movement, which may depend on various factors beyond simple electric fields.

gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83
How cathode is positively charged in voltaic cell?I mean at cathode reduction takes place ,but the electron which is gained for reduction comes from anode,than why cathode becomes positively charged ?As electrons are from anode not from cathode that means electrons are not lost by cathode ,so it should not become positively charged.Right?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
cathode is said to be the positive electrode . its not positively charged . everything in nature is electrically neutral . we perceive it as separate charges for better understanding .
 
proton007007 said:
cathode is said to be the positive electrode . its not positively charged . everything in nature is electrically neutral . we perceive it as separate charges for better understanding .

Alright, this might be off topic BUT, I too am perplexed by the phenomenon of radioactive decay. How is electrical neutrality maintained when electrons (beta particles) and proton-neutron sets (alpha particles) are being spit out by some elements. These particles are whizzing by all the other neutral particles - how do they maintaintain their neutrality.
 
proton007007 said:
cathode is said to be the positive electrode . its not positively charged . everything in nature is electrically neutral . we perceive it as separate charges for better understanding .

I'm sorry but this is just wrong.

bwana said:
Alright, this might be off topic BUT, I too am perplexed by the phenomenon of radioactive decay. How is electrical neutrality maintained when electrons (beta particles) and proton-neutron sets (alpha particles) are being spit out by some elements. These particles are whizzing by all the other neutral particles - how do they maintaintain their neutrality.

They don't. Electrons have a negative charge, protons have a positive charge, and neutrons are electrically neutral. You're replying to a bad answer.

gracy said:
How cathode is positively charged in voltaic cell?I mean at cathode reduction takes place ,but the electron which is gained for reduction comes from anode,than why cathode becomes positively charged ?As electrons are from anode not from cathode that means electrons are not lost by cathode ,so it should not become positively charged.Right?

The electrons that flow into the cathode are used in the chemical reaction between the cathode and the electrolyte. They are indeed 'lost' from the cathode in this reaction.
 
gracy said:
cathode is positively charged in voltaic cell?
"Cathode" is the term for any electron source. "Electrodes" in a voltaic cell can be "cathodes" when one considers their function within the cell as electron sources for reactants within the cell, and as "anodes" when one considers their function outside the cell as electron sinks for an electrical circuit.
 
Indeed. A cathode is generally the electrode that conventional current leaves. Conventional current is a flow of positive charges, which is the same as negative charges flowing the opposite direction. So the cathode is just the electrode that electrons flow into. This refers to the external circuit of course. For a battery, the 'internal circuit', consisting of the two electrodes and electrolyte, this is opposite. Electrons leave the cathode and flow into the electrolyte.
 
Can you please tell me why cathode is at high potential in galvanic cell?As in galvanic cell electrons naturally(spontaneously) flow from anode to cathode ,cathode must be at higher potential because electrons always move from lower to higher potential.But how cathode is at higher potential?How anything can be at higher potential?
 
gracy said:
As in galvanic cell electrons naturally(spontaneously) flow from anode to cathode
Very quick question: has there been any explicit statement in class regarding electrode name convention? There are at least two, European, and American, and they have been a source of endless confusion over the past one or two centuries.

Drakkith said:
A cathode is generally the electrode that conventional current leaves.
Same question: which convention?
 
We have been told that at anode oxidation takes place and at cathode reduction takes place.I don't know whether it is European and American convention.Please tell me why cathode is at high potential in galvanic cell?How anything can be at higher potential?
 
  • #10
gracy said:
cathode reduction takes place.
I'll call that American. It's an electron source and reduces oxidized species which reach it.
gracy said:
at higher potential?
Without context, "higher potential" is meaningless; the discussion in your text or lecture notes has to be comparing it to something, and without knowing what that "something" is, it's tough to really answer your question.
 
  • #11
Bystander said:
Without context, "higher potential" is meaningless
Higher potential than anode.
 
  • #12
This may be more in reference to the electrons themselves. Electrons at/on the cathode have a higher potential energy than exists for oxidized species approaching the cathode, or at the anode once they've been transported through the cell.
 
  • #13
Bystander said:
. Electrons at/on the cathode have a higher potential energy
You mean it depends on material of cathode or anode?If one electrode is made up of copper and the other one is made up of zinc,electrons of zinc would be at lower potential than electrons of copper?Right?If yes.then it implies that reduction or oxidation potential is all about electrons of particular material/element.
 
  • #14
gracy said:
depends on material of cathode or anode?
Yes.
gracy said:
copper and the other one is made up of zinc
Copper ions oxidize zinc, or zinc reduces copper ions.
gracy said:
reduction or oxidation potential is all about electrons of particular material/element.
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #15
Sir,last question
If any element's electron has greater oxidation potential does it mean it has lower potential than the electrons of cathode?But why only reduction potential is considered as potential not oxidation potential?Because if we consider oxidation potential the anode would be at higher potential.
 
  • #16
gracy said:
reduction potential is considered as potential not oxidation potential?
This is another of those "arbitrary choices/conventions." Whether it's regarded as one or the other, it's the same reaction. We're just looking at which direction we're going to consider. If we say "oxidation," it means we're going to look at how easily every reaction proceeds as an oxidation when comparing them. If we say "reduction," we're comparing every reaction as a reduction.
 
  • #17
Bystander said:
This is another of those "arbitrary choices/conventions." Whether it's regarded as one or the other, it's the same reaction.
Let us take oxidation potential as potential .Then anode (at which oxidation takes place)should be at higher potential than cathode.As electrons move towards higher potential ,electrons should move from cathode to anode,but it is really not the case.So how it's our choice whether we take oxidation or reduction potential as potential of electron?
 
  • #18
How does a salt bridge complete circuit?As no electrons flow within salt bridge.
 
  • #19
Current is a movement of charge. Electrons are not the only charged objects.
 
  • #20
So ,you mean ions ?Ions are responsible for completing the circuit via salt bridge?
 
  • #21
Yes.
 
  • #22
But to complete the circuit ions/electrons should move from cathode to anode ,how that occurs?
 
  • #23
Through an external circuit.
 
  • #24
Borek said:
an external circuit.
In which load is attached,right?
 
  • #25
Yes.
 
  • #26
Maybe it is important to note that charge carriers do not only move due to electric fields and potentials but also because of,e.g., density gradients and, more generally, due to gadients of the chemical potential.
 
  • #27
DrDu said:
Maybe it is important to note that charge carriers do not only move due to electric fields and potentials but also because of,e.g., density gradients and, more generally, due to gadients of the chemical potential.

Yes I had occasion recently to remark about this in connection with batteries, and also that something can seem to move against a gradient, a guy, not a student, seemed to be getting into a slight tangle about it.
Solubility and Precipitation of Unknown Ion

I think, well does anyone agree? - that quite a lot of harm is done by teaching electrochemistry as ions being attracted to the electrode of opposite sign like electrostatic attraction in vacuum. You can explain electrochemistry without saying that. All that happens is chemical reactions - but by the 'miracle' of metallic conduction a reaction in one place can be coupled to another in another place. The reactions cause concentration gradients, thence net ion movements. (Actually I think it would be possible to develop the whole subject without using the concept 'electrical potential' :olduhh:)

Once implanted this idea of attraction at a distance is hard to shake off. In fact I'm not sure I can explainl
band electrophoresis now any other way. :olduhh:
 
  • #28
gracy said:
In which load is attached,right?
Borek said:
Yes.
In external circuit electrons move from anode to cathode,I am asking where do electrons go after reaching cathode? To complete the circuit ions/electrons should move from cathode to anode,that's what I am asking ,how that occurs?
 
  • #29
gracy said:
In external circuit electrons move from anode to cathode,I am asking where do electrons go after reaching cathode? To complete the circuit ions/electrons should move from cathode to anode,that's what I am asking ,how that occurs?
They react with the ions of the solution, e.g. ##\mathrm{Cu^++e^- \to Cu}##.
Let's consider the simple example of raffination of copper. There you have two electrodes, the anode consisting of impure copper and a pure copper cathode.
On the anode, copper dissolves according to ## \mathrm{Cu \to Cu^+ +e^-}##.
The electrons will be driven by an external electric field through a wire and e.g. a generator to the cathode, where the reverse reaction takes place and pure copper is deposited. Hence on the anode copper ions are created and on the cathode destroyed.
This generates a concentration gradient which drives the copper ions to the cathode.
Hence the copper ions transport the current in the solution. The gradient of the copper ion concentration is equalled by a static gradient of the counter ions which don't move, so that the solution remains overall charge neutral.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #30
Yes.But that doesn't complete the circuit.To complete the circuit negative ions/electrons should go to anode.That's where salt bridge comes in.I think it all works in this manner
Electrons are lost by anode ,they move from external circuit to cathode.And those electrons are gained by cations of cathode half cell and get deposited on cathode.But to complete the circuit which is essential for flow of current the anion from cathode moves through the salt bridge into anode half cell .,this is how circuit is completed.Salt bridge contains inert electrolytes which provide conducting medium for flow of ions without reacting with them.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K