How did spacetime pop out into existence?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dismachaerus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Existence Spacetime
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the nature of spacetime and its existence at the moment of the Big Bang. Participants argue that spacetime is a unified manifold that did not "pop" into existence but has always existed in some form, even at t=0. The consensus is that while space is expanding, spacetime itself is not a physical entity that can be said to have a beginning or end. Misunderstandings about the relationship between space and time, particularly in the context of General Relativity (GR) and Special Relativity (SR), are highlighted as common pitfalls in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with Special Relativity (SR) concepts
  • Knowledge of the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric
  • Basic grasp of manifold theory in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) solutions in cosmology
  • Study the concept of singularities in General Relativity
  • Explore the relationship between spacetime and quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of manifolds in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, theoretical physicists, and students of physics interested in the foundational concepts of spacetime and the Big Bang theory.

  • #31
Isaac0427 said:
I'm not talking about a point in spacetime. Also, the North Pole has nothing to do with this.

It does, it is a similar concept and you need to understand this in order to have any chance of understanding what is going on.

Isaac0427 said:
Please respond to the question, not my wording.
Have you stopped to consider that your wording is very relevant to what you are asking? That you are not able to put the question in a language that is appropriate is only indicative of the fact that you are not yet familiar enough with the mathematics which go into the description of how space-time behaves. As such, we can only give you something which is somewhat of a popularisation of the theory. The theory is self-consistent and described beautifully in mathematics, in order to understand it properly, you need to learn these branches of mathematics. It is not enough to read a popular account of things and "reason" based on what you have read.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: artyb
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Orodruin said:
It does, it is a similar concept and you need to understand this in order to have any chance of understanding what is going on.Have you stopped to consider that your wording is very relevant to what you are asking? That you are not able to put the question in a language that is appropriate is only indicative of the fact that you are not yet familiar enough with the mathematics which go into the description of how space-time behaves. As such, we can only give you something which is somewhat of a popularisation of the theory. The theory is self-consistent and described beautifully in mathematics, in order to understand it properly, you need to learn these branches of mathematics. It is not enough to read a popular account of things and "reason" based on what you have read.
Ok, but can you please give me a simple answer: is there something that would have caused the Big Bang, or are we just assuming it appeared.
 
  • #33
Orodruin said:
Why do you find this harder to imagine than the Earth having a north pole?
Because the North Pole is the effect of the Earth's positioning. Spacetime having a beginning seems to be the effect of nothing at all.
 
  • #34
Isaac0427 said:
Because the North Pole is the effect of the Earth's positioning. Spacetime having a beginning seems to be the effect of nothing at all.

It is the effect of a coordinate system having a point at which the coordinates do not tell you very much. It is different from the singularity of the FLRW space-time in that you can remove the singularity by imposing a different coordinate system, but similar in the sense that there is a point where the given coordinate system breaks down. Once you understand this, you can start thinking about a cone with the top point removed, this is to some extent more similar to the type of manifold you would deal with in the FLRW case.

Isaac0427 said:
is there something that would have caused the Big Bang, or are we just assuming it appeared.

You are back at arguing in a manner that you have been repeatedly told does not make sense. You cannot talk of appearing or cause without a time concept, which is an integral part of the space-time itself.

The OP has been answered several times over and you are going in circles here. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
849
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K