How Do Electronics Behave in Space for Homemade Satellite Projects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheDreamer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electronics Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the challenges of electronics in space for homemade satellite projects, emphasizing the environmental factors that affect component reliability. Key issues include vacuum conditions, extreme temperature fluctuations, radiation exposure, and the outgassing of materials in a vacuum. The conversation highlights the importance of using components rated for military or even "Class S" specifications to withstand these conditions. It concludes that while Low Earth Orbit (LEO) presents some shielding benefits, cold temperatures and vacuum effects remain primary concerns for balloon-launched electronics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of IC survivability and reliability standards, particularly MIL-I-38535.
  • Knowledge of environmental effects on electronics, including vacuum and temperature cycling.
  • Familiarity with radiation types and their impact on electronic components.
  • Awareness of thermal dynamics in high-altitude and space environments.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the MIL-I-38535 standard for military-grade electronic components.
  • Learn about the effects of radiation on electronics, focusing on space applications.
  • Study thermal management techniques for electronics in vacuum environments.
  • Explore the design considerations for homemade satellites operating in LEO.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, hobbyists, and students interested in aerospace technology, satellite design, and the effects of space environments on electronic systems.

TheDreamer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have been wondering for a while about how electronics are effected in space and what can be done to combat any adverse effects.

My dream, get a homemade satellite into space. I don't need people telling me how impossible of an idea this is to accomplish, I simply came for answers.

The only thing I know is that in a weather balloon rig that was let loose a camera gave out after about an hour and a half due to battery complications or something of the sorts, this just made it into the stratosphere...

Thank you all!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
TheDreamer said:
I have been wondering for a while about how electronics are effected in space and what can be done to combat any adverse effects.

My dream, get a homemade satellite into space. I don't need people telling me how impossible of an idea this is to accomplish, I simply came for answers.

The only thing I know is that in a weather balloon rig that was let loose a camera gave out after about an hour and a half due to battery complications or something of the sorts, this just made it into the stratosphere...

Thank you all!

Not to worry. Your dream is as serious as it gets and I respect that. The electronics issues are strictly depending on how high you go.

I used to work in IC survivability/reliability for military spacecraft applications. http://www.cti-us.com/pdf/HistoryEEESpacePartsinUSA.pdf" . I was involved in a lot of the leg work for the creation/adoption of QML mentioned in this document (MIL-I-38535 specifically).

The big environmental issues include vacuum, heat/cold in general but also fast temperature cycling (e.g. seconds to minutes between 125C and -55C and then back to 125C), vibration and radiation.

You may have heard/seen how ICs and other components have different operating temperature ranges depending on whether they are "rated" for commercial, industrial and military. There is actually a rating above conventional military called "Class S" which is even more extreme than "standard military". Standard military is -55C to +125C while commercial is 0C to +70C. Space applications are part of the reason for the wider range.

Most electrical components were designed presuming "air" operation with standard air pressures. When you go to vacuum, things like plastics start outgassing volatile components like plasticizers which can both weaken the plastic but also react with heat or radiation to form corrosive chemicals that are now floating around other spacecraft components and which can affect reliability.

The most exotic threat is radiation. The real reason no one has gone to Mars, for instance, is space radiation - really nothing else. And not because the electronics can't be designed for it but because humans can not be adapted for it. One solar flare and you give every man onboard an assured 100% lethal dose of radiation in a matter of minutes to hours. Radiation can damage electronics in many different ways depending on the technology and the type of radiation. Challenging but manageable with enough money.

Now the "nice" part of space is Low Earth Orbit or LEO. Within the Earth's magnetic fields for some shielding and partially in the outer extent of the atmosphere (there is some "air drag" on most things orbiting in LEO). This is where the Space Shuttle operates exclusively.

LEO is also at the top range of where you'd operate using a balloon launch system. It turns out the radiation levels aren't that much of an issue - certainly the stratosphere is almost sea level in comparison to space shuttle altitudes.

So for a balloon-based, the primary worry is likely cold mostly. Distant second is some vacuum effects, then maybe heat, then finally radiation with vibration not really being a problem (usually its from rockets used for launch).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Note also, the thermodynamics of high altitude flight in a balloon are completely different from space. The air at 100,000 feet is still there and it is cold, so things will cool rapidly via convection. In space, there is no air, so the only cooling is by radiation. Balancing radiation from the sun and radiation from the Earth against the radiation of the spacecraft to achieve a proper equilibrium is a tricky endeavour.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K