How do electrons absorb and emit photons?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jobyts
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Radiation Speed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of heat propagation, particularly in vacuum and through conductors, and the role of electrons and electromagnetic radiation in these processes. Participants explore concepts related to heat as electromagnetic waves, the behavior of atoms during heat conduction, and the implications of temperature on atomic interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that in a vacuum, heat moves solely through radiation, while in materials, conduction and convection also play roles.
  • There is a discussion on whether heat conduction occurs through atomic movement or merely atomic vibrations, with some participants questioning the nature of atomic interactions during heat transfer.
  • One participant suggests that heat causes inter-atomic forces to weaken, while others argue that the forces do not weaken but rather the distance between atoms increases with temperature.
  • Participants debate the concept of heat energy as kinetic energy and how it relates to the temperature of materials, with some emphasizing the continuous transfer of heat energy even after atoms have absorbed energy from electromagnetic waves.
  • There is a mention of photons being absorbed by electrons, which can then emit photons and return to lower energy states, indicating a complex interaction between heat and electromagnetic radiation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the mechanisms of heat transfer, the role of atomic movement versus vibration, and the nature of energy conservation in the context of heat and electromagnetic waves. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of heat and energy, assumptions about atomic behavior, and the complexity of interactions between electromagnetic radiation and matter that are not fully explored.

jobyts
Messages
226
Reaction score
60
What's the speed of heat radiation in vacuum?

And how does the heat propagation (in vacuum and through a conductor) happen? Similar to the particle theory and wave theory for the light, is there any theory for the heat energy?
 
Science news on Phys.org
jobyts said:
What's the speed of heat radiation in vacuum?

And how does the heat propagation (in vacuum and through a conductor) happen? Similar to the particle theory and wave theory for the light, is there any theory for the heat energy?

You may get a better answer in the Solid State forum. But here's my two cents:

Electrons are generally responsible for heat conduction. The phonons (vibrations of the nuclei) also play a part, depending on the temperature of the medium. It depends on the specific conductor you're using. At some point, in a vacuum, I would think the electrons have to be excited enough to spit out photons, which are Electromagnetic radiation... which in a vacuum should go on forever at the speed of light theoretically.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_radiation
 
In an ideal vacuum you have no electrons, there is only electromagnetic radiation that travels at the speed of light. In a material, heat generally moves diffusively - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_diffusion for some of the basic concepts and equations.
 
But it is vacuum in between all the atomic particles, right? So, heat should conduct through the vacuum inside the material at the speed of light, right?
 
jobyts said:
But it is vacuum in between all the atomic particles, right? So, heat should conduct through the vacuum inside the material at the speed of light, right?
In a vacuum, heat moves by radiation alone; there is no conduction.

In a solid (or an otherwise matter-occupied space, such as water or air), conduction comes into play. This is the physical transfer of kinetic energy from atom to adjacent atom.

The third form is convection, which happens only in materials where the atoms are free to move about. This is the physical movement of atoms with kinetic energy from place to place (distinct from conduction)
 
Last edited:
jobyts said:
But it is vacuum in between all the atomic particles, right? So, heat should conduct through the vacuum inside the material at the speed of light, right?
Between the atoms it does. In simple terms an atom vibrates, the electromagnetic waves from this vibration travel at the speed of light to the next atom which begins to vibrate. This vibration then creates and elctromanetic wave to the next atom and so on ...
It is the finite time needed for the atom to begin vibrating which slows the propagation of heat and also means that the speed depends on the nature of the material.
 
I just read this URL.
http://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/projects/vss/docs/thermal/1-how-does-heat-move.html

I am not convinced that the atoms and molecules move when conduction happens. Will it move, or as Pythagorean said, it just vibrates? It should be just vibration. Or there wouldn't be any matter left after it conducted heat, right?

Another question, when we heat water, how did it become less denser? I would imagine, it is because the heat caused the inter-atomic attraction to get weaker, and because of that, the atoms/molecules moved away slightly, and that caused the substance to be less denser.

If this is true, here's my question. How did the inter atomic force got weaker with temparature? I would imagine, inter-atomic forces are fundamentally is the resultant of protonic/electronic repulsion/attraction. Does heat cause a reduction in charge in the atomic particle? No, right? Electrons and protons have the same charge, regardless of the temperature, right?
 
Last edited:
jobyts said:
I am not convinced that the atoms and molecules move when conduction happens. Will it move, or as Pythagorean said, it just vibrates? It should be just vibration. Or there wouldn't be any matter left after it conducted heat, right?
In a solid, they'll vibrate, since they're confined, but in a less dense medium such as water or air, they are not so confined and will move around like billiard balls.

If atoms simply bounce off their neighbors, transferring kinetic energy, it's conduction. If the atoms are able to travel a distance from source to recipient, it's convection.

jobyts said:
Another question, when we heat water, how did it become less denser? I would imagine, it is because the heat caused the inter-atomic attraction to get weaker, and because of that, the atoms/molecules moved away slightly, and that caused the substance to be less denser.
No. The heat imbues the molecules with kinetic energy, causing them to bounce off each other more vigorously, pushing them farther apart.

jobyts said:
If this is true, here's my question. How did the inter atomic force got weaker with temparature?
It didn't. It gets weaker with distance.
 
DaveC426913 said:
In a solid, they'll vibrate, since they're confined, but in a less dense medium such as water or air, they are not so confined and will move around like billiard balls.

If atoms simply bounce off their neighbors, transferring kinetic energy, it's conduction. If the atoms are able to travel a distance from source to recipient, it's convection.

If the atom transferred the heat energy to kinetic energy, there should not be anymore heat to conduct/convect, right? but, why is the conductor/convector still hot?
 
  • #10
1) Heat energy is kinetic energy.
2) Any matter that is above absolute zero (that is to say, all of it) has kinetic energy and thus heat energy
3) "Why is the conductor still hot?" This sounds like a macroscopic observation i.e. when you touch it. If it has more heat/kinetic energy than you, it will continue to transfer that heat until the you and it are in equilibrium.
 
  • #11
May be I did not clearly state my question.
Let me elaborate:

Heat is an electromagnetic wave, and in the EM spectra, it is the Infrared wave. The wave hits a conductor, the EM infrared wave causes the atom in the conductor to move/vibrate. The atom got the energy to move around, from the infrared wave. My question is, if the atom already used the heat energy for the particle movement, how could it still have the heat energy (by the law of conservation of energy)? The EM wave should die right there, right?
 
  • #12
jobyts said:
May be I did not clearly state my question.
Let me elaborate:

Heat is an electromagnetic wave, and in the EM spectra, it is the Infrared wave. The wave hits a conductor, the EM infrared wave causes the atom in the conductor to move/vibrate. The atom got the energy to move around, from the infrared wave. My question is, if the atom already used the heat energy for the particle movement, how could it still have the heat energy (by the law of conservation of energy)? The EM wave should die right there, right?

an EM wave contains several photons. Given that the photons are on the same order as the given material, electrons in the material will absorb photons, and step up an energy state... but then the electrons can simply emit the photon and step back down a state. They don't absorb the whole EM wave, and they don't "like" being in high-energy states as much as they "like" their lower states, so they tend to calm back down after being excited.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K