How Do F-t and F-d Graphs Relate to Momentum and Work Done?

  • Thread starter Thread starter semc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between force-time (F-t) and force-displacement (F-d) graphs in the context of momentum and work done. Participants are exploring the implications of integrating these graphs and how they relate to fundamental physics concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand why integrating the F-t graph relates to momentum and questions the relationship between integration and the work done as represented by the F-d graph. Other participants discuss the definitions of integration and differentiation in relation to these graphs.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the definitions of momentum and work, and how they relate to the areas under the respective graphs. Some guidance has been offered regarding the basic definitions of integration and differentiation, but there is no explicit consensus on the original poster's confusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the foundational definitions of physics concepts and their graphical representations, indicating a potential gap in understanding that may need further exploration.

semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5
The area under the F-t graph gives the momentum of the object right?But why when you intergate the graph you get rate of change of momentum with respect to time?Why is it that when u integrate F-d graph you get the work done?:confused:

Any help would be appreciated :!) :!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Right, the area of the F-t diagram gives the change of momentum of the object, since [tex]\vec{F}=\frac{d(m\vec{v})}{dt} \Rightarrow \int_{0}^{t_{1}} \vec{F}dt = m\vec{v_{1}}-m\vec{v_{0}}[/tex]. Considering the work, it equals [tex]W=\int_{1}^{2} \vec{F}d\vec{s}[/tex], where 1 and 2 are the two points on the trajectory. This all folows from basic definitions, so you should be more specific if you still don't understand..
 
hmm...so i suppose when the meaning of integrating or differentiating a graph follows their basic definitions?:rolleyes:
 
You can use this shorthand to understand it: integrating a graph means finding the area beneath the graph between some two points ; differentiating a graph means finding the tangent on the graph in some point.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K