How Do Fourier Integral Operators Work in Mathematical Analysis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of Fourier integral operators in mathematical analysis, specifically the operator defined by the integral $$Au(x)=\frac{1}{{(2\pi h)}^{n'}}\int_{\mathbb{R}_y^m\times\mathbb{R}_\theta^{n'}} e^{i\Psi(x,y,\theta)/h}a(x,y,\theta,h)u(y)\, dy\, d\theta$$. The user seeks assistance in demonstrating that the pseudodifferential operator $$L=\frac{1}{1+\mid\nabla_{y,\theta}\Psi\mid^2}(1+h\nabla_y\bar{\Psi}D_y+h\nabla_{\theta}\bar{\Psi}D_{\theta})$$ satisfies the condition $$L=\mathcal{O}(<\theta>^{-k})$$ through integration by parts. The inquiry highlights the complexities involved in oscillating integrals and the need for clarity in mathematical proofs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier integral operators
  • Familiarity with pseudodifferential operators
  • Knowledge of oscillatory integrals
  • Proficiency in integration by parts techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier integral operators in detail
  • Explore the theory behind pseudodifferential operators
  • Learn about oscillatory integrals and their applications
  • Practice integration by parts in the context of advanced calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of mathematical analysis, and researchers focusing on Fourier analysis and pseudodifferential equations will benefit from this discussion.

super_al57
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody! I'm studying the Fourier integral operators but I can't resolve a pass. I'm considering the following operator:
$$Au(x)=\frac{1}{{(2\pi h)}^{n'}}\int_{\mathbb{R}_y^m\times\mathbb{R}_\theta^{n'}} e^{i\Psi(x,y,\theta)/h}a(x,y,\theta,h)u(y)\, dy\, d\theta$$ where $$Au\in C^0 (\mathbb{R}^m)$$. I know that $$Au\in C^0 (\mathbb{R}^m)$$ is well defined as oscillating integral if I use the pseudodifferential operator $$L=\frac{1}{1+\mid\nabla_{y,\theta}\Psi\mid^2}(1+h\nabla_y\bar{\Psi}D_y+h\nabla_{\theta}\bar{\Psi}D_{\theta})$$. I have to demonstrate, using integration by parts, that $$L=\mathcal{O}(<\theta>^{-k})$$.
Could anyone help me? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
:L I have no idea about how to begin. And I have no further information.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K