MHB How do g(x,t) and J_n(x) relate to the identity involving Bessel functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Another1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the function g(x,t) and Bessel functions J_n(x), specifically how to demonstrate the identity involving their squares. It is established that g(x,t) can be expressed as a series involving Bessel functions, and bounds for J_0(x) and J_n(x) are provided. The orthogonality of Bessel functions is highlighted, suggesting a potential method to prove the identity involving their squared terms. Participants are encouraged to explore this orthogonality to derive the desired result. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical properties and relationships of Bessel functions in the context of the given identity.
Another1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
$$g(x,t) = e^{(\frac{x}{2})(t-\frac{1}{t})}=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}J_{n}(x)t^{n}$$

and

$$\left| J_{0}(x) \right|\le 1 $$ and $$ \left| J_{n}(x) \right|\le \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} $$

how to show that

1=$$(J_{0}(x))^{2}+2(J_{1}(x))^{2}+2(J_{2}(x))^{2}+...$$

I don't have idea
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: [please help]Bessel function

Another said:
$$g(x,t) = e^{(\frac{x}{2})(t-\frac{1}{t})}=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}J_{n}(x)t^{n}$$

and

$$\left| J_{0}(x) \right|\le 1 $$ and $$ \left| J_{n}(x) \right|\le \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} $$

how to show that

1=$$(J_{0}(x))^{2}+2(J_{1}(x))^{2}+2(J_{2}(x))^{2}+...$$

I don't have idea
I haven't done the whole thing but note that Bessel functions are orthogonal:
[math]\int _0 ^1 J_{\nu} \left ( \alpha_{\nu ~ m} x \right ) ~ J_{\nu } \left ( \alpha_{\nu ~ n} x \right ) ~x ~dx = \frac{1}{2} \left [ J_{\nu + 1} \left ( \alpha _{\nu ~ m} \right ) \right ] ^2 \delta_ {m~n}[/math]

Does this give you any ideas?

-Dan
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K