How Do Higher-Degree Polynomials Work in SAT II Math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lLovePhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sat Sat math
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding higher-degree polynomials and their properties, particularly the Remainder Theorem, which states that dividing a polynomial P(x) by x-r yields a remainder of P(r). Users explore whether testing these concepts is beneficial and discuss the nature of polynomial zeros, including irrational and complex roots. Additionally, there are inquiries about solving variation problems and probability, specifically how to calculate the probability of at least one event occurring using complementary probabilities. The conversation also touches on graphing functions and the interpretation of mathematical expressions, emphasizing the importance of clarity in notation. Overall, the thread serves as a collaborative platform for clarifying complex mathematical concepts in preparation for the SAT II Math exam.
  • #31
lLovePhysics said:
Ohh.. I see now. Also, is there a fast way to see that sin 77 and sin 103 are of the same value? I took me a long time to figure out that they were both 77 degrees above the x axis.. Also, is there an universal formula for finding angles of the same value for sin, cos, tan? Thanks. :smile:

90-77= 13 and 103- 90= 13. Look at a graph of y= sin x about x= 90 degrees.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
What about:

Tan (-60) equals

a) -tan 30
b) cot 30
c) -tan 60
d) -cot 60
e) tan 60

In what way could you find the answer the fastest?

Using the co-function formula, I did: 90-A=-60 so, A= 150

Tan (-60)= cot 150 but there are not answers like that. Would the fastest way be plugging them into the calc?:smile:

edit: oh yeah it is clear it is c) because tan is an odd function..
 
Last edited:
  • #33
tan(-x)=-tan(x). Because sin(-x)=-sin(x) and cos(-x)=cos(x). Plugging into a calc teaches you little. Learn the symmetries of the trig functions. You can do it all from sin and cos.
 
  • #34
Draw a unit circle in the x-y plane centered on (0,0). Draw a ray at a particular angle from the positive x-axis going counterclockwise... (x,y) is the point of intersection of the ray and the circle.

x= cosine of the angle
y = sine of the angle..

So see how x and y change as the angle increases... so tan of the angle = y/x. So tan is positive when x>0 and y>0 or x<0 and y<0.
tan is negative if x>0 and y<0 or x<0 and y>0

So in the first quadrant (top right), sin>0, cos>0 and tan>0
In the second quadrant (top left) sin>0 cos<0 and tan<0
In the 3rd quadrant (bottom left) sin<0, cos<0 and tan>0
4th quadrant (bottom right) sin<0, cos>0 and tan<0
 
  • #35
How come when I graph: f(x)=\sqrt{3}\cos{x}\sin{x} on my graphing calculator it looks like a earthquake scale on my HP 50g and then a regular cosine/sine function on my Ti84+?

On my hp50g, the maximums fluctuate ranging from .52 to 6.8?? What is happening here?

Edit: Okay, I just changed the window screen and they show a smooth graph now! I changed from like -64/64 horizontal to -2pi, 2pi...

Edit 2: Wait, both of them have different maximums of .52 to 6.8... okay this is weird.

How am I suppose to solve the problem when it asks for the amplitude and the amplitude fluctuates? Did I insert the function into the graphing calc wrong? Am I suppose to put parentheses somewhere?
 
Last edited:
  • #36
lLovePhysics said:
How come when I graph: f(x)=\sqrt{3}\cos{x}\sin{x} on my graphing calculator it looks like a earthquake scale on my HP 50g and then a regular cosine/sine function on my Ti84+?

On my hp50g, the maximums fluctuate ranging from .52 to 6.8?? What is happening here?

Edit: Okay, I just changed the window screen and they show a smooth graph now! I changed from like -64/64 horizontal to -2pi, 2pi...

Edit 2: Wait, both of them have different maximums of .52 to 6.8... okay this is weird.

How am I suppose to solve the problem when it asks for the amplitude and the amplitude fluctuates? Did I insert the function into the graphing calc wrong? Am I suppose to put parentheses somewhere?

Be careful about entering the functions especially for sin cos... use parenthese when needed. I assume the function is f(x)=\sqrt{3}(\cos{x})(\sin{x}) and not f(x)=\sqrt{3}\cos{(x\sin{x})} right?
 
  • #37
learningphysics said:
Be careful about entering the functions especially for sin cos... use parenthese when needed. I assume the function is f(x)=\sqrt{3}(\cos{x})(\sin{x}) and not f(x)=\sqrt{3}\cos{(x\sin{x})} right?

Oh sorry, the function is suppose to be: f(x)=\sqrt{3}cosx+sinx

EDIT: Oh.. My.. God.. I was looking at the x- coordinate instead of the y! Yeah the y is 2 for all of the maximums. However, how come when the horiz window is large the maximums fluctuate??

Also, how do you calculate the amplitude of the function by hand? I'm confused on that.
 
Last edited:
  • #38
lLovePhysics said:
Oh sorry, the function is suppose to be: f(x)=\sqrt{3}cosx+sinx

EDIT: Oh.. My.. God.. I was looking at the x- coordinate instead of the y! Yeah the y is 2 for all of the maximums. However, how come when the horiz window is large the maximums fluctuate??

Also, how do you calculate the amplitude of the function by hand? I'm confused on that.

Any function of the form Acosx + Bsinx has amplitude \sqrt{A^2+B^2}
 
  • #39
learningphysics said:
Any function of the form Acosx + Bsinx has amplitude \sqrt{A^2+B^2}


Is there a rule/proof for this? Any keywords I can search??
 
  • #40
lLovePhysics said:
Is there a rule/proof for this? Any keywords I can search??

http://www.ugrad.math.ubc.ca/coursedoc/math100/notes/trig/phase.html

Check out the part that says superimposing sines and cosines..

The idea is to write Acosx+ Bsinx in the form Csin(x+y)

You know that:
Csin(x + y)
=C(sinx)(cosy) + C(cosx)(siny) (sum rule for sines)
=C(siny)(cosx) + C(cosy)(sinx) (just rearranging terms here)

So you set this equal to your original function and equate coefficients...
Csiny = A
Ccosy = B

And from here we get
C^2(sin^2y + cos^2y) = A^2 + B^2
C^2 = A^2 + B^2
 
Last edited:
  • #41
Whew, back again! Thanks for the explanation.

How do you find the domain of sin^{2}\theta
 
  • #42
I'm sure someone will come up with some nice mumbo jumbo about the square function being a continuous bijection of the sine function unto the reals, if that is what is correct to say (someone tell me) but basically, there aren't any values that \sin^2 \theta isn't defined for, so its good.
 
Last edited:
  • #43
Why can you use this method for this problem?:

If \log_{10}m=\frac{1}{2} then \log_{10}10m^{2}=

I just solved for m, using the first equation and plugged it into the 2nd to solve for the answer but it is wrong... Can you not do that but instead you need to use the log properties? Why is this?
 
  • #44
lLovePhysics said:
Why can you use this method for this problem?:

If \log_{10}m=\frac{1}{2} then \log_{10}10m^{2}=

I just solved for m, using the first equation and plugged it into the 2nd to solve for the answer but it is wrong... Can you not do that but instead you need to use the log properties? Why is this?

That's not even right, and exactly what problem are you talking about?
 
  • #45
Nvm, my mistake :D

Is csc(2\theta)=\frac{1}{sin(2\theta)}?
 
  • #46
lLovePhysics said:
Nvm, my mistake :D

Is csc(2\theta)=\frac{1}{sin(2\theta)}?

Yes?
 
  • #47
Also, how come exponential equations are inverses of logarithms?

For example,

#1 b^{x}=y

if you switch the x and y terms (definition of inverse)

then: b^{y}=x

which is equal to: log_{b}x=y

I just don't get why the exponential eq. are inverses of logs. You can express eq. #1 as log_{b}y=x and that is not the inverse of eq. #1 right? So... do they only become inverses after you switch the x and y and turn it into a log?
 
  • #48
lLovePhysics said:
Also, how come exponential equations are inverses of logarithms?

For example,

#1 b^{x}=y

if you switch the x and y terms (definition of inverse)

then: b^{y}=x

which is equal to: log_{b}x=y

I just don't get why the exponential eq. are inverses of logs. You can express eq. #1 as log_{b}y=x and that is not the inverse of eq. #1 right? So... do they only become inverses after you switch the x and y and turn it into a log?
Obviously properties like this depend upon what the functions are- that is, upon how they are defined.
What are your definitions of bx and logb(x)?

I know a way of defining bx rigorously and then logb(x) is definid as its inverse.
I also know a way of definging logb(x) directly and then bx is defined as its inverse.
 
  • #49
I kind of see what you mean.

Here's an excerpt from my book about logs and exponential functions:

"The basic properties of exponents and logarithms and the fact that the exponential function and the logarithmic function are inverses lead to many interesting problems.
 
Last edited:
  • #50
So inverse functions are reflected off y=x line while odd functions are reflected off the origin right? How do visualize something reflected off the origin? How is it different to a reflection off y=x?
 
  • #51
Also, I dont' really get inverse trig functions, when you calculate arcsin(2/3) on your calculator, it only gives you the value that is within the "conventional domain" of -pi/2<=x<=pi/2 right?

However, when you solve for the angles of a trig solution like in the problem: 3\sin^{2}\theta+10\sin \theta-8=0, you need to look for the reference angles? That is, the angles outside the conventional domain? (2nd quad, in this case)

Can someone come up with a general rule for this? Why do reference angles qualify as a solution when it is outside of the arcsin domain?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
16K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K