How Do I Calculate Inner Product in Gram-Schmidt Procedure for Polynomial Basis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter boneill3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Procedure
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Gram-Schmidt procedure applied to the vector space of real polynomials of degree at most 2, specifically focusing on constructing an orthonormal basis from the basis {1, t, t²}. The inner product is defined as = f(-1)g(-1) + f(0)g(0) + f(1)g(1>.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of inner products and the normalization of vectors within the Gram-Schmidt process. Questions arise regarding the correct application of the inner product definition and the normalization steps for the basis vectors.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the normalization of vectors and the computation of inner products. Some participants provide guidance on the normalization process, while others express confusion about the notation and calculations involved. Multiple interpretations of the steps are being discussed, indicating a collaborative effort to clarify the procedure.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential notational confusion and the importance of correctly applying the inner product definition. There are also mentions of discrepancies in normalization factors, which are under discussion.

boneill3
Messages
126
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We consider P2 the vector space of all real polynomials of degree at most 2.

<f,g> = [itex]f(-1)g(-1)+f(0)g(0)+f(1)g(1)[/itex]

Use the Gram-Schmidt procedure to construct an orthonormal basis for P2 from the basis {1,t,t2}

Homework Equations



[itex] v_{j+1}:=u_{j+1}-\sum_{i=1}^{j}<<u_{j+1},e_{i}>>e_{i}[/itex]

[itex] e_1 = \frac{u_1}{||u_{1}|| }[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have a basis [itex]u_1 = 1, u_2 = t, u_3 = t^2[/itex]

so

[itex] e_1 = \frac{u_1}{||u_{1}|| }[/itex]

[itex] e_1 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex]


is the next step

[itex] v_{2}:=u_{2}-\sum_{i=1}^{j}<<u_{2},e_{i}>>e_{i}[/itex]

[itex]= t - << t,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} >>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex]


My question is how do I calculate the inner product [itex]<< t,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} >>[/itex]
do I need to plug in the value of f(t) into

<f,g> = [itex]f(-1)g(-1)+f(0)g(0)+f(1)g(1)[/itex]

and does g() become [itex] g(e_1) = g(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})[/itex]


regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The inner product <<t,1/sqrt(2)>>=(-1)/sqrt(2)+0/sqrt(2)+(1)/sqrt(2). That's what you definition says, isn't it? g is a constant.
 
So

[itex]v_{2}:=u_{2}-\sum_{i=1}^{j}<u_{j+1},e_{i}>e_{i}[/itex]

[itex]= t - << t,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} >>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex]

[itex]= t - (\frac{-1}{\sqrt(2)}+\frac{0}{\sqrt(2)}+\frac{1}{\sqrt(2)}) \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex]

[itex]= t - (0) \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex]

[itex]v_{2}:= t[/itex]




for v3: do I substitute [itex]v_{2}:= t[/itex] from above for [itex]e_{2}[/itex]
in the next equation? or do I need to nomalise it first



[itex]v_{3}:=u_{3}-\sum_{i=1}^{j}<u_{j+1},e_{i}>e_{i}[/itex]

[itex]= t^2 - (<< t^2,e_{2} >>e_{2}) + (<< t,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} >>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})[/itex]

[itex]= t^2 - (<< t^2,t >>t) + (<< t,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} >>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})[/itex]


or

[itex]= t^2 - (<< t^2,1 >>1) + (<< t,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} >>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})[/itex]


regards
 
Last edited:
That last equation was using [itex](\frac{1}{t})t= 1[/itex]
as [itex]e_{2}[/itex]
 
t is orthogonal to e1=1/sqrt(2) (i.e. <t,1/sqrt(2)>=0). But it's not normalized. <t,t> is not one. Normalize it. Then that becomes e2. Then find u3=t^2-(<t^2,e1>e1+<t^2,e2>e2) and normalize u3. Your are getting your functions all mixed up in the Gram-Schmidt process.
 
BTW before you go any further <1,1>=3. So the normalization of 1 isn't 1/sqrt(2). It's 1/sqrt(3). Sorry, I missed that.
 
Thanks

So

[itex]v_{2}:= t[/itex]
therefore

[itex]e_{2} = \frac{t}{||v_2|| }v_2[/itex]
[itex]e_{2} = \frac{t}{\sqrt{-1^2+0^2+1^2}}[/itex]
[itex]e_{2} =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex]

is that right ?
 
beetle2 said:
Thanks

So

[itex]v_{2}:= t[/itex]
therefore

[itex]e_{2} = \frac{t}{||v_2|| }v_2[/itex]
[itex]e_{2} = \frac{t}{\sqrt{-1^2+0^2+1^2}}[/itex]
[itex]e_{2} =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex]

is that right ?

Is boneill3 the same person as beetle2? If so the Forum doesn't allow really allow you to use two different user pseudonyms. If you are, please stick with one, ok? Otherwise I should report this. If you aren't you are doing exactly the same kind of notational confusion as boneill3. If v2=t, then e2=v2/||v2||=t/||t|| which is t/sqrt(2). Not 1/sqrt(2).
 
Hi,
Sorry I had to log in from another computer.

I found u3=t^2-(<t^2,e1>e1+<t^2,e2>e2) to equal

t^2-(1/sqrt(3)(1/sqrt(3)+1/sqrt(3)) + t/sqrt(2) (t/sqrt(2)+ t/sqrt(2))

= t^2 - (2/3+t^2)

u3 = -2/3

does normalising make it e3= -(2/3) / sqrt((-2/3)^2 +(-2/3)^2+(-2/3)^2)

e3 = -1/sqrt(3)
 
  • #10
I think i'll make it clearer
I found
[itex]u3=t^2-(<t^2,e_1>e_1+<t^2,e_2>e_2)[/itex]
to equal

[itex]t^2-(\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}})(\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}) + (\frac{t}{\sqrt{2}}) (\frac{t}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{t}{\sqrt{2}})<br /> <br /> = t^2 - (\frac{2}{3}+t^2)<br /> <br /> = \frac{-2}{3}[/itex]
does normalising make it

[itex]e_{3}= \frac{\frac{-2}{3}}{{\sqrt{(\frac{-2}{3})^2 +(\frac{-2}{3})^2+(\frac{-2}{3})^2}}}[/itex]

[itex]e_{3} = \frac{-1}{\sqrt{3}}[/itex]
 
  • #11
If that whole thing had worked then you should be able to check that <e1,e3>=0. It's not zero. The inner product of two functions of t, <f(t),g(t)>, should always be a number, not another function of t. Try computing <t^2,t/sqrt(2)> again.
 
  • #12
So,

to compute <t^2,t/sqrt(2)>

we have

[itex]\left[(-1)^2(\frac{-1}{\sqrt{2}})+](0)^2(\frac{0}{\sqrt{2}})+](1)^2(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})\right][/itex]

therfore

[itex]t^2-(\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}})(\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}) + (\frac{t}{\sqrt{2}}) (0)<br /> = t^2 - (\frac{2}{3})[/itex]
 
  • #13
Ok, now you just have to normalize t^2-(2/3).
 
  • #14
I normalised u3 and got

[itex]e_{3}= \frac{t^2-\frac{-2}{3}}{\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}}[/itex]

I checked that <e1,e3>=0 which it does.

Thanks so much for your help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K