How do I find the current through each resistor using Kirchoff's laws?

  • Thread starter Thread starter darksyesider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kirchoff's law Law
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Kirchhoff's laws to find the current through each resistor in a circuit. The original poster seeks guidance on the correct approach to identify the currents and set up the necessary equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the identification of currents in the circuit, with some questioning the number of currents represented. There is mention of using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) to establish equations for solving the currents.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to approach the problem, including the potential use of mesh analysis versus simpler KVL and KCL applications. Some participants provide clarifications on the laws and their applications, while others express uncertainty about the original poster's understanding of the concepts.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates they are new to Kirchhoff's laws and seeks clarification on the differences between KVL and KCL. There is a recognition that the complexity of the problem may exceed their current level of study.

darksyesider
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See attached image.

Suppose I want to find the current through each resistor…how would I do so?


Homework Equations



Kirchoffs eqns … sum of voltages around every loop is zero


The Attempt at a Solution




1. The first problem I have with this, is that i am not sure how many currents there are. I put arrows in different colors the currents that I think there are. Could someone verify this step?

2. If (1) is correct, then I think that the blue current = red + green current

3. Next, I would attempt at using kirchhoffs law on the smallest loop, and the loop which does not involve the top two resistors (the one with 5 resistors and 2 batteries in it). Then i would solve for current using a matrix.

So generally speaking, is this a correct method?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-03-26 at 5.05.18 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-03-26 at 5.05.18 PM.png
    17.5 KB · Views: 497
Physics news on Phys.org
You have too many currents shown (red, blue, green = one too many). You have one little loop in the upper part another loop in the lower part. Just draw currents for those two loops.
 
You've identified that there will be three different current values to be found. Three unknowns implies that you need three independent equations in order to solve for them.

There are several possible approaches, the most basic of which is to write KVL around the obvious loops (yielding two independent equations), and writing KCL at one of the nodes in order to give a third equation. That is essentially the steps that you've described. :smile:
 
gneill said:
You've identified that there will be three different current values to be found. Three unknowns implies that you need three independent equations in order to solve for them.

There are several possible approaches, the most basic of which is to write KVL around the obvious loops (yielding two independent equations), and writing KCL at one of the nodes in order to give a third equation. That is essentially the steps that you've described. :smile:

Yes, that would work, but why would you want to go to 3 equations in 3 unknowns if he can just do what I suggested and have two equations in two unknowns?
 
phinds said:
Yes, that would work, but why would you want to go to 3 equations in 3 unknowns if he can just do what I suggested and have two equations in two unknowns?

That would be the mesh current approach which, based upon the way the question was presented by the OP, is probably a chapter or two further along in his studies. I figured that he'd just been introduced to basic KVL and KCL at this point.

Besides, you still need to write a third equation (essentially the same KCL equation) in order to determine the green current from the two mesh currents, even with the mesh approach :smile:
 
gneill said:
That would be the mesh current approach which, based upon the way the question was presented by the OP, is probably a chapter or two further along in his studies. I figured that he'd just been introduced to basic KVL and KCL at this point.

Besides, you still need to write a third equation (essentially the same KCL equation) in order to determine the green current from the two mesh currents, even with the mesh approach :smile:

Damn. You're right on both counts. Of course you already knew that didn't you :smile:

Thanks for that correction ... I might have confused him.
 
phinds said:
Thanks for that correction ... I might have confused him.

No problem, always glad to help where I can.
 
Yes, I am just being introduced to Kirchoff's, so I have not heard about "mesh".

sorry, but what is the difference between: KVL and KCL??

For the 3 equations, I have the blue = red +green and applying kirchhoff on both small loops.
 
darksyesider said:
Yes, I am just being introduced to Kirchoff's, so I have not heard about "mesh".

sorry, but what is the difference between: KVL and KCL??

For the 3 equations, I have the blue = red +green and applying kirchhoff on both small loops.

There are two Kirchhoff laws: KCL and KVL. The Current Law and the Voltage Law. One pertains to the sum of currents that enter/leave a node, the other to the sum of potential drops/rises around a closed loop. Your text should define both and provide examples.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K