How do I find the derivative of one vector with respect to another?

Click For Summary
To find the derivative of one vector with respect to another, it is essential to define the vector spaces involved and the nature of the function. When differentiating a function f from Rn to Rm at a point v0, the derivative is represented as a linear transformation that approximates f near v0. For vector-valued functions, the derivative can be expressed as a matrix of partial derivatives, which is crucial for applications like solving Euler equations. The chain rule plays a vital role in relating the derivatives of two vector functions, allowing the construction of the matrix of linear transformations. Understanding these concepts is fundamental for accurately performing vector differentiation in various mathematical contexts.
spastic
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
What does it mean to operate with \frac{d}{\vec{v}} where v is a vector?

Say you have another vector q, how do you do \frac{d\vec{v}} {d\vec{q}}[\itex]?<br /> <br /> What about \frac{d\vec{v}} {d\vec{v}}?<br /> (Can&#039;t remember how to do the proper font sorry)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First you will have to say what kind of vector space \vec{v} is in and what kind of function of v you are talking about. If f: Rn to Rm, that is if the variable, \vec{v} is an n dimensional vector variable and f maps it to an m dimensional vector, the d\vec{f}/d\vec{v}, at \vec{v}_0 is "the linear transformation from Rn to Rm that best approximates \vec{f} in some region around \vec{v}_0".

More precisely, a function,\vec{f}, from Rn to Rm, is said to be differentiable at \vec{v}_0 if and only if there exist a linear transformation, L, from Rn to Rm, and a function \epsilon(\vec{v}), from Rn to Rm, such that
1) f(\vec{v})= f(\vec{v}_0)+ L(\vec{v}- \vec{v_0})+ \epsilon(\vec{v})
2) \lim_{\vec{v}\rightarrow \vec{0}}\epsilon(\vec{v})/||\vec{v}-\vec{v}_0||= 0

It can be shown that the linear transformation, L, in (1), is unique and we say that L is the derivative of f at \vec{v}_0.

Notice that, if we reduce this to R1 to R1, we are saying that the derivative is NOT the slope of the tangent line y= mx+ b but, rather, the linear function y= mx.

If f is from R1 to R3, a "vector valued function of a single real variable", then the L above is linear transformation from R1 to R3 given by
Lt= \left&lt;\frac{df_x}{dt},\frac{df_y}{dt},\frac{df_z}{dt}\right&gt;t
which we can think of as being "represented" by the usual derivative vector,
\left&lt;\frac{df_x}{dt},\frac{df_y}{dt}, \frac{df_z}{dt}\right&gt;

If f is from R3 to R, a "real valued function of 3 real variables, x, y, z", then the derivative, in the sense above, is the linear transformation from R3 to R given by the dot product
\left&lt;\frac{\partial f}{\partial x},\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}, \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\left&gt;\cdot \vec{v}[/itex]<br /> which we can think of as represented by the gradient vector,<br /> \left&amp;lt;\frac{\partial f}{\partial x},\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}, \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\left&amp;gt;[/itex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; More generally, if f is from R&lt;sup&gt;n&lt;/sup&gt; to R&lt;sup&gt;m&lt;/sup&gt;, it derivative, at any &amp;quot;point&amp;quot;, is the linear transformation which can be represented, in some basis, as the m by n matrix having the partial derivatives of the components of f as elements.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; In any case, of course, \frac{d\vec{v}}{d\vec{v}}, where \vec{v} is a vector function from R&lt;sup&gt;n&lt;/sup&gt; to itself (NOT just a single vector- derivatives are only defined for functions) is the identity transformation on R&lt;sup&gt;n&lt;/sup&gt; which can be reprsented by the n by n identity matrix.
 
Thanks mate. I didn't expect such a long reply and one quite so theoretical. It'll take me a bit to mull over so cheers!
 
HallsofIvy
More generally, if f is from Rn to Rm, it derivative, at any "point", is the linear transformation which can be represented, in some basis, as the m by n matrix having the partial derivatives of the components of f as elements.
I want to understand exactly how do I derivate vector by vector.
My problem: I try to solve Euler equations with some method... In this method I use a linearization to the first vector \hat{Q}. I need to write the \partialF/\partialQ.
Where Q and F are vectors [1,4].
Can you help me to understand how to build the matrix of linear transformation?

Thank you, I have found the reference: http://www.met.rdg.ac.uk/~ross/Documents/VectorDeriv.html
 
Last edited:
4eburashka said:
HallsofIvy

I want to understand exactly how do I derivate vector by vector.
My problem: I try to solve Euler equations with some method... In this method I use a linearization to the first vector \hat{Q}. I need to write the \partialF/\partialQ.
Where Q and F are vectors [1,4].
I presume that you mean they are vectors in R2, not just that specific vector!

Can you help me to understand how to build the matrix of linear transformation?
Thank you.

Say F= <f(x,y), g(x,y)> and Q= <p(x,y), q(x,y)>. Let r= <x,y>. Then, by the chain rule,
\frac{dF}{dQ}= \frac{dF}{dr}/\frac{dQ}{dr}[/itex].<br /> <br /> And those two derivatives are the matrices having the partial derivatives as entries. (Strictly speaking, they are the linear transformations represented by these matrices in the &lt;1, 0&gt;, &lt;0, 1&gt; basis for R<sup>2</sup>.)<br /> \frac{dF}{dr}= \left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial g}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial g}{\partial y}\end{array}\right]<br /> <br /> Similarly,<br /> \frac{dQ}{dr}= \left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial p}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial p}{\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial q}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial q}{\partial y}\end{array}\right]<br /> <br /> So that<br /> \frac{dF}{dW}= \left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial g}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial g}{\partial y}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial p}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial p}{\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial q}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial q}{\partial y}\end{array}\right]^{-1}<br /> <br /> The existence of that derivative depends not only on the existence of these partial derivatives but also on dQ/dr being invertible.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K