How do I find the derivative of one vector with respect to another?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of vector functions, specifically how to find the derivative of one vector with respect to another. The context includes concepts from vector calculus and linear transformations, particularly in relation to functions mapping between different dimensional vector spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the meaning of differentiating vectors, questioning how to express derivatives like \(\frac{d\vec{v}}{d\vec{q}}\) and \(\frac{d\vec{v}}{d\vec{v}}\). There is discussion on the conditions under which these derivatives are defined, particularly in relation to the dimensionality of the vector spaces involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided theoretical insights into the nature of vector differentiation and linear transformations. Others are seeking clarification on specific applications, such as constructing the matrix of linear transformation for vector derivatives in the context of Euler equations. The conversation reflects a mix of theoretical exploration and practical application without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific mathematical frameworks, such as the chain rule and the conditions for differentiability in vector spaces. Participants are also considering the implications of linearization and the invertibility of derivatives in their discussions.

spastic
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
What does it mean to operate with \frac{d}{\vec{v}} where v is a vector?

Say you have another vector q, how do you do \frac{d\vec{v}} {d\vec{q}}[\itex]?<br /> <br /> What about \frac{d\vec{v}} {d\vec{v}}?<br /> (Can&#039;t remember how to do the proper font sorry)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First you will have to say what kind of vector space \vec{v} is in and what kind of function of v you are talking about. If f: Rn to Rm, that is if the variable, \vec{v} is an n dimensional vector variable and f maps it to an m dimensional vector, the d\vec{f}/d\vec{v}, at \vec{v}_0 is "the linear transformation from Rn to Rm that best approximates \vec{f} in some region around \vec{v}_0".

More precisely, a function,\vec{f}, from Rn to Rm, is said to be differentiable at \vec{v}_0 if and only if there exist a linear transformation, L, from Rn to Rm, and a function \epsilon(\vec{v}), from Rn to Rm, such that
1) f(\vec{v})= f(\vec{v}_0)+ L(\vec{v}- \vec{v_0})+ \epsilon(\vec{v})
2) \lim_{\vec{v}\rightarrow \vec{0}}\epsilon(\vec{v})/||\vec{v}-\vec{v}_0||= 0

It can be shown that the linear transformation, L, in (1), is unique and we say that L is the derivative of f at \vec{v}_0.

Notice that, if we reduce this to R1 to R1, we are saying that the derivative is NOT the slope of the tangent line y= mx+ b but, rather, the linear function y= mx.

If f is from R1 to R3, a "vector valued function of a single real variable", then the L above is linear transformation from R1 to R3 given by
Lt= \left&lt;\frac{df_x}{dt},\frac{df_y}{dt},\frac{df_z}{dt}\right&gt;t
which we can think of as being "represented" by the usual derivative vector,
\left&lt;\frac{df_x}{dt},\frac{df_y}{dt}, \frac{df_z}{dt}\right&gt;

If f is from R3 to R, a "real valued function of 3 real variables, x, y, z", then the derivative, in the sense above, is the linear transformation from R3 to R given by the dot product
\left&lt;\frac{\partial f}{\partial x},\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}, \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\left&gt;\cdot \vec{v}[/itex]<br /> which we can think of as represented by the gradient vector,<br /> \left&amp;lt;\frac{\partial f}{\partial x},\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}, \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\left&amp;gt;[/itex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; More generally, if f is from R&lt;sup&gt;n&lt;/sup&gt; to R&lt;sup&gt;m&lt;/sup&gt;, it derivative, at any &amp;quot;point&amp;quot;, is the linear transformation which can be represented, in some basis, as the m by n matrix having the partial derivatives of the components of f as elements.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; In any case, of course, \frac{d\vec{v}}{d\vec{v}}, where \vec{v} is a vector function from R&lt;sup&gt;n&lt;/sup&gt; to itself (NOT just a single vector- derivatives are only defined for functions) is the identity transformation on R&lt;sup&gt;n&lt;/sup&gt; which can be reprsented by the n by n identity matrix.
 
Thanks mate. I didn't expect such a long reply and one quite so theoretical. It'll take me a bit to mull over so cheers!
 
HallsofIvy
More generally, if f is from Rn to Rm, it derivative, at any "point", is the linear transformation which can be represented, in some basis, as the m by n matrix having the partial derivatives of the components of f as elements.
I want to understand exactly how do I derivate vector by vector.
My problem: I try to solve Euler equations with some method... In this method I use a linearization to the first vector \hat{Q}. I need to write the \partialF/\partialQ.
Where Q and F are vectors [1,4].
Can you help me to understand how to build the matrix of linear transformation?

Thank you, I have found the reference: http://www.met.rdg.ac.uk/~ross/Documents/VectorDeriv.html
 
Last edited:
4eburashka said:
HallsofIvy

I want to understand exactly how do I derivate vector by vector.
My problem: I try to solve Euler equations with some method... In this method I use a linearization to the first vector \hat{Q}. I need to write the \partialF/\partialQ.
Where Q and F are vectors [1,4].
I presume that you mean they are vectors in R2, not just that specific vector!

Can you help me to understand how to build the matrix of linear transformation?
Thank you.

Say F= <f(x,y), g(x,y)> and Q= <p(x,y), q(x,y)>. Let r= <x,y>. Then, by the chain rule,
\frac{dF}{dQ}= \frac{dF}{dr}/\frac{dQ}{dr}[/itex].<br /> <br /> And those two derivatives are the matrices having the partial derivatives as entries. (Strictly speaking, they are the linear transformations represented by these matrices in the &lt;1, 0&gt;, &lt;0, 1&gt; basis for R<sup>2</sup>.)<br /> \frac{dF}{dr}= \left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial g}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial g}{\partial y}\end{array}\right]<br /> <br /> Similarly,<br /> \frac{dQ}{dr}= \left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial p}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial p}{\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial q}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial q}{\partial y}\end{array}\right]<br /> <br /> So that<br /> \frac{dF}{dW}= \left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial g}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial g}{\partial y}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial p}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial p}{\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial q}{\partial x} &amp;amp; \frac{\partial q}{\partial y}\end{array}\right]^{-1}<br /> <br /> The existence of that derivative depends not only on the existence of these partial derivatives but also on dQ/dr being invertible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
806
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K