MHB How Do I Find the Y-Intercept of x^2/sqrt(x + 1)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shamieh
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
To find the y-intercept of the function x^2/sqrt(x + 1), substitute 0 for x, resulting in y = 0. The x-intercept is found by setting y to 0, leading to the equation x^2 = 0, which gives x = 0. For vertical asymptotes, set the denominator to zero, yielding x = -1. The horizontal asymptote is determined by comparing the degrees of the numerator and denominator; since the numerator's exponent is larger, there is no horizontal asymptote. The discussion confirms the correct methods for finding intercepts and asymptotes.
shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Find the intercepts.

How do I find the y intercept?
$$
\frac{x^2}{\sqrt{x + 1}}$$

the x is easy I just plug in a 0.

for the y intercept what are the rules...It's like if the exponent is bigger than the bottom exponent then = undefined?? and if its the same you look at the coefficient and if it's smaller exponent/bigger exponent= 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have it backwards actually. To find the y-intercept you plug in 0 for x and solve. To find the x-intercept you plug in 0 for y and solve.

So you'll get two equations:

(1) $$0 = \frac{x^2}{\sqrt{x + 1}}$$

(2) $$y=\frac{0^2}{0+1}$$

Which one is which?
 
okay so y = 0..

so how do I find the x... I say x^2 = 0 and then x = 0 ? Oh I think I see now!

- - - Updated - - -

Jameson, since this is relating to the same problem...What about Vertical Asymptote and Horizontal Asymptotes?

for Vertical asymptote I would just set the denominator to zero correct?

x + 1 = 0 which means x = - 1 for V.A.then for the horizontal asymptote how do I find it? if the exponent in the numerator is larger than the exponent in the denominator it would mean that it is undefined therefore being no Horizontal Asymptote? Am I Correct in saying this?
 
Yep, exactly! When we divide by zero we have a vertical asymptote so we set the denominator equal to 0. The exponent in the numerator is larger than the one in the denominator so we conclude that it doesn't stabilize to some horizontal value. (Yes).

Here is what it looks like by the way and you should see you're correct on all accounts:

[GRAPH]uzgyyv8zsx[/GRAPH]
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
603
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K