How Do I Integrate This Sphere-Related Equation Correctly?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jderulo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Integration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of a sphere-related equation involving mass transfer, specifically the equation q_m = -D A (dc/dx), where A is the surface area of a sphere. Participants are exploring how to correctly integrate this equation and convert it from a cylindrical to a spherical context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the equation q_m = -D A (dc/dx) and attempts to integrate it, expressing confusion about the role of r^2 in the integration process.
  • Another participant questions the relationship between the variables x and r, indicating a lack of clarity in the problem statement.
  • A later reply requests the original problem statement to clarify the context and variables involved.
  • One participant points out that the integration presented is for a cylinder, not a sphere, and suggests how to correctly express the equation for a sphere using the surface area A = 4πr^2.
  • Another participant attempts to integrate the modified equation but expresses uncertainty about the integration process and the resulting expressions.
  • Several participants engage in a discussion about the correct integration of 1/r^2, with one asserting that the integration does not yield a logarithmic result.
  • There is a discussion about how to apply limits of integration, with participants sharing insights on the fundamental theorem of calculus.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not agree on the clarity of the problem statement and the correct approach to the integration. Multiple competing views on the integration process and the relationship between variables remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the clarity of the problem statement and the assumptions regarding the relationship between variables x and r. There are unresolved mathematical steps in the integration process.

jderulo
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi I'm trying to integrate the following q_m = -D A \frac{dc}{dx}
where A = 4 \pi r^2 Yes, a sphere.My supplied literature simplifies to q_m = -D 2 \pi r L \frac{dc}{dr} when A = 2 \pi r L

Integrating to \int_{r1}^{r2} q_m \frac{dr}{r} = - \int_{c1}^{c2} 2 \pi L D dc

Integrated to q_m ln \frac{r_2}{r_1} = 2 \pi L D (c_1 - c_2)

I've had a go but unsure what to do with the r^2

I thought this might work but it gives a negative value for q_m

\int_{r1}^{r2} q_m \frac{dr}{r^2} = - \int_{c1}^{c2} 4 \pi D dc

Integrated to q_m ln \frac{r_2}{r_1^2} = 4 \pi D (c_1 - c_2)Any ideas? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't follow... how does x relate to r?
 
Nick O said:
I don't follow... how does x relate to r?

I've edited it whilst you were reading. Do you follow now? They replace x with r.
 
Not really. Can you post the problem statement? It isn't even clear that r is a variable, or that there is correlation between x and r.
 
I've attached the literature. Basically the formula is for a cylinder, I need to convert it for a sphere.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    18.2 KB · Views: 438
What you post in your last response integrates over a cylinder of radius r, length L. But you are asking about a sphere. Are you asking how to change from a cylinder to a sphere? If so then, yes, the surface area of a sphere of radius r is 4\pi r^2 so that q_m= -DA\frac{dc}{dr} (NOT \frac{dc}{dx}) becomes q_m= -D(4\pi r^2)\frac{dc}{dr} which can be separated as
\frac{q_m}{r^2}dr= -4D\pi dc
and integrating,
q_m\int_{r_1}^{r_2} \frac{1}{r^2}dr= -4D\pi\int_{c_1}^{c_2} dc

Integrate that.
 
This?

q_m ln (\frac{1}{r_1^2}r_2) = 4 \pi D (c_1 - c_2)
 
Then you are not "slightly confused" about integration- you seem to be saying you do not know how to integrate at all. No \int dr/r^2 is not "ln(r^2)". Using the very basic rule \int r^n dr= r^{n+1}/(n+ 1), \int dr/r^2= \int r^{-2}dr= -r^{-1}+ C.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Then you are not "slightly confused" about integration- you seem to be saying you do not know how to integrate at all. No \int dr/r^2 is not "ln(r^2)". Using the very basic rule \int r^n dr= r^{n+1}/(n+ 1), \int dr/r^2= \int r^{-2}dr= -r^{-1}+ C.

How do I fit in r_1 and r_2
 
  • #10
If \int f(x)dx= F(x)+ C then
\int_{x_1}^{x_2} f(x)dx= F(x_2)- F(x_1).
 
  • #11
HallsofIvy said:
If \int f(x)dx= F(x)+ C then
\int_{x_1}^{x_2} f(x)dx= F(x_2)- F(x_1).


Thanks, I thought as much but seeing as I made a glaring error previously I thought I should double check.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K