How do I make more smaller sidelobelevel value of patch antenna?

  • Thread starter Thread starter everjordan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antenna Value
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on optimizing the sidelobe level (SLL) of a 6x1 series fed microstrip rectangular patch antenna designed using HFSS. The initial SLL achieved was around -20dB, while the target is below -25dB. Key parameters influencing the SLL include the width and length of the patch antenna, and the length of the connection line, which is a microstrip line with a high impedance of 100 ohms. Adjustments made using MATLAB, including changing the width to λ/2 and modifying the connection line length, resulted in SLL values between -10dB and -15dB, indicating further optimization is necessary.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of microstrip patch antenna design principles
  • Familiarity with HFSS (High-Frequency Structure Simulator) software
  • Knowledge of MATLAB programming for antenna calculations
  • Basic concepts of Chebyshev polynomials in antenna array design
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques to further reduce sidelobe levels in patch antennas
  • Explore advanced HFSS simulation settings for improved antenna performance
  • Learn about the impact of substrate materials on antenna characteristics
  • Study the application of Chebyshev polynomials in optimizing antenna array patterns
USEFUL FOR

Antenna designers, RF engineers, and students involved in microwave engineering and antenna optimization will benefit from this discussion.

everjordan
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi :)

I am designing 6x1 series fed microstrip rectangular patch antenna by using HFSS.
The schematic of the my design is below.
attachment.php?attachmentid=35967&stc=1&d=1306489779.jpg


This figure is the half of my design for the past analysis.


My goal is below.

SLL(side lobe level <-25dB)
S11(<-20dB)

After I design the patch antenna, I found SLL around -20dB.
However, I want to reduce this value.

So, I check the internet & some papers and found some important parameters.
1. both width and length of patch antenna
2. length of the connection line
{
connection line is the microstrip line.
connection line exits between patch and another patch.
connection line has high impedance[100ohms].
I set the length of line L-2delta(L) {L is the length of the patch antenna}
}

And below is the parameters for antenna.
resonance freq = 26GHz
permitivity = 2.2
height of the substrate = 0.79mm
The values of effective permitivity, both length and width of the patch antenna
are below.

222.jpg


I found that the calculated values are not perfect value.
So I have changed the value such as width of the patch antenna, length of the connection line.

If the width of patch antenna is changed, length of the patch antenna also will be changed.
So, I use MATLAB tool then change the length of the patch antenna and effective permitivity.

These are MATLAB code.

{
% method to obtain patch's length
clc;
clear all;
h = 0.79;
w = 4.53;
er = 2.2;
ee = ((er+1)./2 ) + ((er-1)./2).*(1+12.*h./w)^(-0.5);
f = 26.*(10^(9));
c = 3.*10.^(8);

deltal = h.*0.412.*(ee+0.3).*((w./h) + 0.264)./(ee-0.258)./((w./h) + 0.8) ;
l = 0.5.*3.*(10.^(8))./f./sqrt(ee) - 2.*deltal./1000;
l = l*1000;

w

deltal
l
deltal+l

}

First I set these values to my desin.
However, value of SLL is only around -10~-15dB.
So, I changed width of patch antenna to lambda/2.
And I changed length of the connection line to L-delta(L).
As a result, value of SLL is around -20dB.
333.jpg

To reduce the value of SLL, I change the length of the connection line to -0.01mm incremental.
However, the variation is a little.

How do I make smaller value of SLL?

If u give some advices or some references, it will be helpful.
Thank you~!
 

Attachments

  • 111.jpg
    111.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 525
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
From what I remember in my antenna class, we've symbolically derived the pattern for array factor(I think), for specific size of an antenna array. Then, depending on the value of sidelobe value desired, appropriate filter coefficients were calculated to achieve the desired sidelobe values. These were equated to the terms in the radiation pattern. I used Chebyshev polynomials in the example below.

%part c
N=10;
theta_a=-90:.1:90;
betaa=0;
betab=-90;
psia=180*sind(theta_a)+betaa;
psib=180*sind(theta_a)+betab;
Af1=2/N*(cosd((2*1-1)*psia/2)+cosd((2*2-1)*psia/2)+cosd((2*3-1)*psia/2)+cosd((2*4-1)*psia/2)+cosd((2*5-1)*psia/2));
Af2=2/N*(cosd((2*1-1)*psib/2)+cosd((2*2-1)*psib/2)+cosd((2*3-1)*psib/2)+cosd((2*4-1)*psib/2)+cosd((2*5-1)*psib/2));
figure(1);
subplot(2,1,1),plot(theta_a, 20*log10(abs(Af1))), axis([-90 90 -50 0]), xlabel('theta'), ylabel('|AFn|dB'), title('Pr.3c Normalized AF vs. theta, theta0=0 deg'), grid on;
subplot(2,1,2),plot(theta_a, 20*log10(abs(Af2))), axis([-90 90 -50 0]), xlabel('theta'), ylabel('|AFn|dB'), title('Pr.3c Normalized AF vs. theta, theta0=30 deg'), grid on;%part d-e
SLL=-30;
R=10^(-SLL/20);
u0=cosh(1/(N-1)*acosh(R));
psi=10:10:50;
%[A]=*
B=zeros(5,5);
A=zeros(1,5);
%Td is the Chebyshev polynomial
for c=1:1:5;
u=u0*cosd(psi(c)/2);
A(c)=cosh((N-1)*acosh(u)); %Td(u)
for i=1:1:5;
B(c,i)=2*cosd((2*i-1)/2*psi(c));
end
end

A=A';
IB=inv(B);
I=IB*A;

Af3=2/(N*I(3))*(I(1)*cosd((2*1-1)*psia/2)+I(2)*cosd((2*2-1)*psia/2)+I(3)*cosd((2*3-1)*psia/2)+I(4)*cosd((2*4-1)*psia/2)+I(5)*cosd((2*5-1)*psia/2));
Af4=2/(N*I(3))*(I(1)*cosd((2*1-1)*psib/2)+I(2)*cosd((2*2-1)*psib/2)+I(3)*cosd((2*3-1)*psib/2)+I(4)*cosd((2*4-1)*psib/2)+I(5)*cosd((2*5-1)*psib/2));
figure(2);
subplot(2,1,1),plot(theta_a, 20*log10(abs(Af3))), axis([-90 90 -50 0]), xlabel('theta'), ylabel('|AFn|dB'), title('Pr.3e Normalized AF vs. theta, theta0=0 deg'), grid on;
subplot(2,1,2),plot(theta_a, 20*log10(abs(Af4))), axis([-90 90 -50 0]), xlabel('theta'), ylabel('|AFn|dB'), title('Pr.3e Normalized AF vs. theta, theta0=30 deg'), grid on;
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K