I How do I properly plot the solar spectrum and handle the flux of Arcturus?

AI Thread Summary
To plot the solar spectrum effectively, it is important to handle the 21,000 data points correctly, as the initial graph appears difficult to resolve. The flux of Arcturus may not require adjustment, as it could serve as a calibration standard. Normalizing the data and possibly applying a smoothing filter can enhance clarity, allowing key features to stand out. Additionally, extending the x-axis or focusing on specific subsections may help in visualizing the spectrum better. Researching complex lines like Ca H and K could also provide valuable insights into the data.
AlphaCrucis
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
I'm to plot the solar spectrum from some data files I'm given and locate and mark on my plot various types of spectral lines
I'm trying to plot the solar spectrum (Wavelength versus Flux) from a table of values I'm given. I'm given 3 columns;

Solar Flux
Arcturus Flux
Wavelength

Plotting Solar Flux versus Wavelength gives me a graph (below) that is very difficult to resolve. There are 21,000 data points as well.
If I'm plotting the solar spectrum however; I'm confused what to do with the flux of Arcturus. Is it a calibration standard?
My plot looks like what is shown below; it is difficult to resolve. Perhaps I need to normalize?

Plot.png
I would like something more like this; (it appears I need to flip my plot as well)

Screenshot (130).png


The F/Fc axis for the second image seems like the flux is normalized to a continuum(?).
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The data looks to be already normalised. I don't think you need do anything with the Arcturus spectra. To see what's going on better increase the length of the x-axis or plot subsections.

Given where they are they look like tha Ca H and K lines which are very complex. You would think need to research these lines and their structure.

Regards Andrew

PS I have replied to two other post of yours but never got a reply. Hint.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
andrew s 1905 said:
PS I have replied to two other post of yours but never got a reply. Hint.
Clicking on the user name gives "this user's profile is unavailable". I'm afraid I think that means you won't get a reply to this one either...
 
  • Like
Likes andrew s 1905
You could pass a smoothing filter over the spectrum to smooth it a bit if it appears noisy. The features you're interested in will still be apparent and it would probably look a lot more like the examples given.
 
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top