How do I simplify sigma notation to find the sum in terms of n only?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster attempts to calculate the area under the curve defined by the function 5x + x² over the interval [0,1] using Riemann sums. They express the Riemann sum in sigma notation and seek to simplify it to find the sum in terms of n only.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of separating terms in the sigma notation and using closed-form expressions for sums of integers. The original poster questions their approach after finding discrepancies with expected results.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on using closed-form expressions for the sums involved. The original poster reflects on their earlier mistakes and shares their revised calculations, indicating a progression in their understanding.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that they believe no specific equations are required beyond the sum formulas for positive integers. There is an emphasis on ensuring the calculations align with expected outcomes.

Youngster
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm actually asked to calculate the area under the curve 5x + x2 over the interval [0,1] using Riemann Sums. I found the formula for the Riemann sum over the interval, it being the following:

\sum^{n}_{k=1} (\frac{5k}{n}+\frac{k^{2}}{n^{2}})(\frac{1}{n})

However, I am asked to simplify the sigma notation to find the sum in terms of n only, which is where I'm currently stuck.

Homework Equations



None, I believe. Except perhaps the sum formulas for positive integers

The Attempt at a Solution



I actually just went ahead and multiplied through and separated each term like so

\frac{5}{n^{2}}\sum^{n}_{k=1} k +\frac{1}{n^{3}}\sum^{n}_{k=1} k^{2}

I, however, was left with something completely different from the expected answers given. Am I going through this correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are on the right track. Now use a closed-form expression for those two sums to get something only in terms of n; then you can take the limit as n goes to infinity.
 
Okay, I figured out what I was doing wrong after going through my work - I neglected to multiply part of the numerator of the first sum by 3n, thus giving me something different. So after multiplying through, the end result should be:

\frac{15n^{3}+15n^{2}}{6n^{3}} + \frac{2n^{3}+3n^{2}+n}{6n^{3}}

This should simplify to:

\frac{17n^{3}+18n^{2}+n}{6n^{3}}

This could further be simplified by removing \frac{17n^{3}}{6n^{3}} to get

\frac{17}{6} + \frac{18n+1}{6n^{2}}, where an n is distributed out of the second term.

Then the limit should be \frac{17}{6} as n approaches infinity since the second term is equal to zero. :D
 
Youngster said:
Okay, I figured out what I was doing wrong after going through my work - I neglected to multiply part of the numerator of the first sum by 3n, thus giving me something different. So after multiplying through, the end result should be:

\frac{15n^{3}+15n^{2}}{6n^{3}} + \frac{2n^{3}+3n^{2}+n}{6n^{3}}

This should simplify to:

\frac{17n^{3}+18n^{2}+n}{6n^{3}}

This could further be simplified by removing \frac{17n^{3}}{6n^{3}} to get

\frac{17}{6} + \frac{18n+1}{6n^{2}}, where an n is distributed out of the second term.

Then the limit should be \frac{17}{6} as n approaches infinity since the second term is equal to zero. :D

Sure, that's it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K