How do I solve where the absolute potential should be zero?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the points along the x-axis where the absolute electric potential is zero due to two point charges: +2.0 μC at the origin and -3.0 μC at x = 100 cm. The relevant equation used is V = k * Σ(q/r), where k is the Coulomb's constant. The correct solutions for zero potential are found at x = -2 m and x = 40 cm, with clarification that these points are not equilibrium points where electric fields cancel but rather locations where the net potential equals zero. The confusion between potential and equilibrium points is addressed, emphasizing the importance of using absolute value in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and point charges
  • Familiarity with the equation V = k * Σ(q/r)
  • Knowledge of Coulomb's law and electric fields
  • Basic algebra for solving equations involving distances and potentials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of electric potential and its calculation using V = k * Σ(q/r)
  • Learn about the differences between electric potential and electric field equilibrium points
  • Explore the implications of absolute values in physics equations, particularly in electrostatics
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple point charges and their potentials
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding electric potential in systems with multiple charges.

Vladi

Homework Statement


A point charge of + 2.0 μC is placed at the origin of coordinates. A second, of − 3.0 μC, is placed on the x-axis at x = 100 cm. At what point (or points) on the x-axis will the absolute potential be zero?

Homework Equations


V= ko*∑ (q/r)

The Attempt at a Solution


My work is attached to this post. In the attachment, you will find my calculations which were based off of my drawing and the relevant equation provided. I also included the answer to the problem within the attachment.
 

Attachments

  • img005.jpg
    img005.jpg
    13.7 KB · Views: 543
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your answer of X0 = 2 m (i.e. x = -2 m). I think the given answer of x = -0.2 m is a mistake. Can you see where x = 40 cm comes from?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vladi
Thank you for the quick reply. Schaum's Outline of College Physics does have some typos. I guess this could be one of them. Suppose the absolute potential is somewhere between the two charges in the given prompt. This would imply that the distance between the equilibrium point and the origin is x1. This would also imply that the distance between the charge on the 100 cm mark and the equilibrium point would be 1m-x1. After I plugged these numbers in the relevant equation, I get x=40cm. I get this anwser, but it makes no sense to me. I thought equilibrium points only occur where the magnitudes of the charges are capable of cancelling each other out. How is this answer possible?
 

Attachments

  • part 2 forum.jpg
    part 2 forum.jpg
    13.6 KB · Views: 530
Vladi said:
equilibrium points only occur where the magnitudes of the charges are capable of cancelling each other out.
Neither is an equilibrium point. An equilibrium point is where the fields cancel. The question asks you to find where the net potential is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vladi
haruspex said:
Neither is an equilibrium point. An equilibrium point is where the fields cancel. The question asks you to find where the net potential is zero.
It sounds like I'm confusing the two. How do I go about determining where the net potential is zero?
 
Vladi said:
It sounds like I'm confusing the two. How do I go about determining where the net potential is zero?
Your method was basically sound, but did not find all solutions.
The complication with potential is that the formula is ##\frac{kq}{|r|}##. That modulus sign introduces extra possible solutions.
For equilibrium, i.e. zero field, it is 1/r2, but now the complication is that it is a vector.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vladi
haruspex said:
Your method was basically sound, but did not find all solutions.
The complication with potential is that the formula is ##\frac{kq}{|r|}##. That modulus sign introduces extra possible solutions.
For equilibrium, i.e. zero field, it is 1/r2, but now the complication is that it is a vector.
If I understood you correctly, the relevant equation that I provided is useless if I do not include the absolute value bars. I re-did my calculations from the first part and got that x0=-.4m and x0=2m. This must imply that the absolute potential is zero at a point 2 meters to the left of charge a. The absolute potential is also zero at a point 40cm to the right of charge a. My calculations have been attached to this reply. Is this correct? Thank you for your time. It is much appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • forum part 3.jpg
    forum part 3.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 477
Vladi said:
the relevant equation that I provided is useless if I do not include the absolute value bars.
Not useless, just not general enough.
Vladi said:
The absolute potential is also zero at a point 40cm to the right of charge a.
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vladi
haruspex said:
Not useless, just not general enough.

Yes.
Thank you for all your help. I think I'll understand how to tackle such problems in the future.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K