How do I solve where the absolute potential should be zero?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the points on the x-axis where the absolute potential is zero due to two point charges: +2.0 μC at the origin and -3.0 μC at x = 100 cm. Participants explore the implications of potential and equilibrium points in the context of electric fields and potentials.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations related to the absolute potential and question the validity of certain answers. There is exploration of the relationship between charge magnitudes and potential cancellation, as well as confusion between equilibrium points and points of zero potential.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations and interpretations of the problem, while others have raised questions about the assumptions made regarding equilibrium and potential. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by the absolute value in the potential formula, leading to further exploration of possible solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential typos in reference materials and the need to clarify the definitions of equilibrium points versus points where potential is zero. There is also mention of the necessity of including absolute values in calculations to accurately determine potential locations.

Vladi

Homework Statement


A point charge of + 2.0 μC is placed at the origin of coordinates. A second, of − 3.0 μC, is placed on the x-axis at x = 100 cm. At what point (or points) on the x-axis will the absolute potential be zero?

Homework Equations


V= ko*∑ (q/r)

The Attempt at a Solution


My work is attached to this post. In the attachment, you will find my calculations which were based off of my drawing and the relevant equation provided. I also included the answer to the problem within the attachment.
 

Attachments

  • img005.jpg
    img005.jpg
    13.7 KB · Views: 556
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your answer of X0 = 2 m (i.e. x = -2 m). I think the given answer of x = -0.2 m is a mistake. Can you see where x = 40 cm comes from?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vladi
Thank you for the quick reply. Schaum's Outline of College Physics does have some typos. I guess this could be one of them. Suppose the absolute potential is somewhere between the two charges in the given prompt. This would imply that the distance between the equilibrium point and the origin is x1. This would also imply that the distance between the charge on the 100 cm mark and the equilibrium point would be 1m-x1. After I plugged these numbers in the relevant equation, I get x=40cm. I get this anwser, but it makes no sense to me. I thought equilibrium points only occur where the magnitudes of the charges are capable of cancelling each other out. How is this answer possible?
 

Attachments

  • part 2 forum.jpg
    part 2 forum.jpg
    13.6 KB · Views: 542
Vladi said:
equilibrium points only occur where the magnitudes of the charges are capable of cancelling each other out.
Neither is an equilibrium point. An equilibrium point is where the fields cancel. The question asks you to find where the net potential is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vladi
haruspex said:
Neither is an equilibrium point. An equilibrium point is where the fields cancel. The question asks you to find where the net potential is zero.
It sounds like I'm confusing the two. How do I go about determining where the net potential is zero?
 
Vladi said:
It sounds like I'm confusing the two. How do I go about determining where the net potential is zero?
Your method was basically sound, but did not find all solutions.
The complication with potential is that the formula is ##\frac{kq}{|r|}##. That modulus sign introduces extra possible solutions.
For equilibrium, i.e. zero field, it is 1/r2, but now the complication is that it is a vector.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vladi
haruspex said:
Your method was basically sound, but did not find all solutions.
The complication with potential is that the formula is ##\frac{kq}{|r|}##. That modulus sign introduces extra possible solutions.
For equilibrium, i.e. zero field, it is 1/r2, but now the complication is that it is a vector.
If I understood you correctly, the relevant equation that I provided is useless if I do not include the absolute value bars. I re-did my calculations from the first part and got that x0=-.4m and x0=2m. This must imply that the absolute potential is zero at a point 2 meters to the left of charge a. The absolute potential is also zero at a point 40cm to the right of charge a. My calculations have been attached to this reply. Is this correct? Thank you for your time. It is much appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • forum part 3.jpg
    forum part 3.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 487
Vladi said:
the relevant equation that I provided is useless if I do not include the absolute value bars.
Not useless, just not general enough.
Vladi said:
The absolute potential is also zero at a point 40cm to the right of charge a.
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vladi
haruspex said:
Not useless, just not general enough.

Yes.
Thank you for all your help. I think I'll understand how to tackle such problems in the future.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K