How Do I Use a Centigram Balance to Measure a Copper Slug?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AngelShare
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balance
AI Thread Summary
To measure a copper slug using a Centigram Balance, the readings from the three rulers should be combined to determine the total weight. For example, if the back ruler reads 0, the middle 2, and the front 0.3, the total would be 2.3 centigrams. Similarly, a reading of 40 on the back, 5 in the middle, and 0.2 in the front would equal 45.2 centigrams. Participants expressed the need for more information about the balance's markings for accurate readings. Ultimately, the original poster completed the assignment and sought confirmation from others who were also working on the same lab.
AngelShare
Messages
208
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to use online lab software to do my assignment but I'm not sure if I'm doing this right...

I'm to measure a copper slug (I think that's what it is) using a Centigram Balance. There are three rulers or whatever they are on this thing...the one in the very back is at 0, the one in the middle is at 2, and the one in the front is at .3. Would that be 2.3? And if so, is that 2.3 centigrams?

EDIT: Same thing...if I'm weighing something and the back ruler goes to 40, the middle 5, and the front .2, would that equal 45.2?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could be reading it right. It is difficult for any of us to help you more without more information. Are there any identifying markings on the balance that indicate the range on each ruler? Can you post some pictures of balance? or an "open" weblink to it?
 
Never mind, I went on with the assignment and I believe I did it correctly. I was just posting here to make sure but I went on ahead after waiting a bit since I needed to turn it in. I'll just keep my fingers crossed.:biggrin:
 
Hi Angelshare, I was loooking at your post and i found that I'm actually doing the same lab but i don't really understand, can u help me please if you have that lab answer still!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top