How do I use a free body diagram in this case?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of mass m1 using free-body diagrams in a frictionless system involving two masses, m1 and m2. The key conclusion is that m2 only influences the vertical forces and does not affect the horizontal acceleration of m1 due to the absence of friction. The acceleration can be determined using the formula a = F/(m1+m2), but the free-body diagram approach does not allow for the separation of forces acting on m1 and m2 in this scenario. The support arm's rigidity and the frictionless nature of the surfaces are critical factors in understanding the system's dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with free-body diagrams
  • Knowledge of frictionless surfaces in physics
  • Basic concepts of mass and acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the construction and interpretation of free-body diagrams in multi-body systems
  • Explore the implications of frictionless surfaces on motion dynamics
  • Learn about the effects of external forces on connected masses
  • Investigate advanced topics in Newtonian mechanics, such as tension and normal forces
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of frictionless systems and the application of free-body diagrams in calculating acceleration.

EddiePhys
Messages
144
Reaction score
6
fbd.png

In the above cases I want to find the acceleration a for m1. I can do it by considering m1 and m2 to be a system, which would give me a = F/(m1+m2). How can I use a free-body diagram instead to calculate the acceleration? Using a free-body diagram, m2 only affects the vertical motion by exerting a vertical force and not the horizontal acceleration but we know that since the mass of the system has increased the acceleration will decrease. TLDR; how would I solve for the acceleration of m1 in both of the above cases using only a free-body diagram. All surfaces are frictionless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EddiePhys said:
Using a free-body diagram, m2 only affects the vertical motion by exerting a vertical force and not the horizontal acceleration

In the first diagram, is the support arm holding m2 rigid, and rigidly attached to m1? It might make things more clear if you consider the support arm as a third object with a very small mass.

In the second diagram, if the contact between m1 and m2 is indeed frictionless, what should you expect to happen, intuitively, when you push on m1 (alone)? Have you ever pushed one object out from underneath another one that is resting on top of it?
 
jtbell said:
In the first diagram, is the support arm holding m2 rigid, and rigidly attached to m1? It might make things more clear if you consider the support arm as a third object with a very small mass.

In the second diagram, if the contact between m1 and m2 is indeed frictionless, what should you expect to happen, intuitively, when you push on m1 (alone)? Have you ever pushed one object out from underneath another one that is resting on top of it?

1) Yes, it's holding m2 in place
2) Yes, it would slide from beneath m2, but for the time m2 is on top of m1, wouldn't it affect the acceleration?

Could you please show me how to make a free-body diagram in the two cases such that the horizontal acceleration is affected too?
 
For 2) above, no it would not affect the acceleration of m1 because there is no friction so no force.

I'm not sure what you're getting at with your question. My best guess is you want to figure out how much of F is going to accelerate m1 and how much is going to accelerate m2. You can't do that with a free-body diagram in this case.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
888
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K