How do metal balls induce stability in a tetrahedral magnet arrangement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gillsimo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism
AI Thread Summary
Arranging six N/S rod magnets in a tetrahedral formation is complex due to the conflicting magnetic forces at the vertices. Each vertex experiences three poles, with one pole attracting the other two while they repel each other. Introducing metal balls at each vertex stabilizes the arrangement by allowing all poles to attract one another. The metal balls create separation between the magnets, enabling smoother magnetic field lines and reducing force conflicts. This interaction enhances stability by allowing the magnetic lines of force to flow through the balls, facilitating attraction between the magnets and the metal.
gillsimo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi...take six regular N/S rod magnets and arrange them as a tetrahedron.
It's fiddly to achieve...because it can't actually be done in terms of magnetic attraction/repulsion.
Each of the four vertices have 3 poles meeting & in each case the situation in one whereby one pole is attracted to the other two but the other two are not attracted to each other.
What intrigues is that one can add a plain metal ball to each of the vertices & each immediately becomes stable, all three poles now attracted to each other.
Might somebody please explain to me what is happening in terms of the magnetism induced into the balls to make this happen?
Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know for sure but:

notice how the bearings provide separation between the poles in the magnetic bars.
The +-+ poles aren't in direct contact as they would be without the bars.
This allows the bending of the magnetic lines of force to sort themselves out over a slightly longer distance through the body of the bearing.

Lines of force being far apart and smooth-of-curvature is an indication of more gentle forces.

1618281610826.png


1618283793698.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
One way to think about it: Say it's NNS. The N-S field lines flow through the ball. The "leftover" N now sees steel which it attracts like a magnet usually does to steel. They attract.

Another way: In your tetrahedron the magnets are not as close as they would be without the balls.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top