Undergrad How do PIR detectors react to plants?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sophiecentaur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Detectors Plants
Click For Summary
PIR detectors can be triggered by nearby leaves moving in the wind, despite the expectation that plant respiration would not significantly affect surface temperatures. The discussion explores the possibility that the leaves might reflect infrared radiation from other sources, although the distance from the house and the positioning of the detectors complicate this theory. Atmospheric infrared variations and the temperature of the ground may also play a role in triggering the detectors. The issue seems to diminish when plant growth is trimmed back, suggesting proximity to the detectors is a key factor. Overall, the interaction between environmental conditions and plant movement appears to be the primary cause of false alarms in this scenario.
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
30,276
Reaction score
7,442
I thought that plants respire so slowly that their surface temperatures must be pretty much the same as ambient. However, on windy nights, I have experienced three different PIR security lights in three different positions that are triggered by nearby leaves when the wind blows them about.
None of the three PIRs are pointing at the house and there are no houses in the direction they point. What could possibly be the explanation, I wonder? Could the leaves be reflecting IR that originates in the house? Difficult to believe in one case because it is solar operated and 10m away from the house, pointing along a deserted lane.
The problem goes away when I trim the growth back to a spacing of more than a metre.

Possible answer:
I found one paper (this link) that suggests values of heat evolution of respiring plants of the order of a few mW per gram of plant material. A small branch of the size I am cutting off, would perhaps have a leaf mass of 200g, which would imply less than a Watt overall. For just a couple of leaves (mass, say 10g), the heat evolved would be only a few tens of mW. Would that raise the surface temperature appreciably? Any opinions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is behind those leaves? If it's the sky it will probably be colder. You might get get a mixture of atmospheric IR at various altitudes. It willl be much more significant than the temperature rise from plant respiration on a windy night.
 
Drakkith said:
Thanks for that list. I have had most of those problems at one time or another. I ended up using a Radar based detector once, in a really difficult situation. That sorted it. Most of the items in the list don't fit the scenario, though. The only thing that triggers the misfire seems to be wind plus nearby leaves.
willem2 said:
What is behind those leaves? If it's the sky it will probably be colder. You might get get a mixture of atmospheric IR at various altitudes. It willl be much more significant than the temperature rise from plant respiration on a windy night.
I think you could be right about background IR being shuttered by the moving leaves. Another idea I had was reflection from the house behind - but the house is not behind one of the detectors. All three PIRs are tilted significantly downwards so not much sky is seen and there is no artificial lighting closer than 1km. Perhaps it could be down to warm ground but the view is mostly just greenery. The effect is no worse or better in cold weather, although, to be fair, I guess there is no growth up there in winter.
No opinions about my Hot Leaves possibility? I suppose I could try experimenting with a resistor on a stick. . . . . . . :wink:
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K