How Do Relativity Principles Apply to Moving Clocks on a Train Platform?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neutrino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sr
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in relativity involving two clocks placed on a train platform and their readings as a train passes by. The problem requires understanding the synchronization of clocks in different inertial frames and how this affects observations of time and distance.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion about the synchronization of clocks in different frames and the implications of simultaneity. They question how the clocks can read the same time while being at different spatial locations. There is also discussion about the effects of relativistic time dilation and the interpretation of events from the perspective of the train versus the platform.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the problem, with some providing insights into the nature of simultaneity in different frames. There is an ongoing dialogue about the interpretation of the clocks' readings and the implications for the length of the train as measured in different frames. No consensus has been reached yet, but the discussion is productive.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific assumptions about the synchronization of clocks and the nature of events as perceived from different frames of reference. The problem is framed within the context of a textbook exercise, which may impose certain constraints on the interpretation of the scenario.

neutrino
Messages
2,093
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A train passes a platform with velocity v. Two clocks are placed on the edge of the platform separated by a distance L and synchronized relative to the platform inertial system. Clock 1 reads 4:00 when it coincides with the front of the train, and clock 2 reads 4:00 when it coincides with the rear of the train. Answer questions relative to an observer on the train. [Emphasis mine]

(a) What is the length of the train?

(b) What is the reading of the clock 2 when clock 1 coincides with the front of the train?

(c) What is the time interval between the two end events?


Homework Equations



Lorentz Transformations


The Attempt at a Solution


Before answering a, b and c, I actually need to understand this question. Here are my qualms:

1. If the part of the question in bold refers to observations from the platform frame, then I don't understand how the clocks can be synchronised. The clocks read 4:00 at different times(events).

2. If it refers to observations from the train, then it seems to me to be in contradiction with what the author says a few pages earlier. It is proved that given a pair of clocks, which are synchronised in a frame in which they are at rest, moving in the the same direction and separated in space, the leading clock lags behind the trailing one(the exact amound being Lv/c2, L- measured distance between clocks). If that is true, then howcome clock 1(leading clock) reads 4:00 before clock 2(trailing).

What am I missing? :confused:


For those interested, this is problem 2.4 from Richard Mould's Basic Relativity (Springer).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
neutrino said:

Homework Statement



A train passes a platform with velocity v. Two clocks are placed on the edge of the platform separated by a distance L and synchronized relative to the platform inertial system. Clock 1 reads 4:00 when it coincides with the front of the train, and clock 2 reads 4:00 when it coincides with the rear of the train. Answer questions relative to an observer on the train. [Emphasis mine]

(a) What is the length of the train?

(b) What is the reading of the clock 2 when clock 1 coincides with the front of the train?

(c) What is the time interval between the two end events?


Homework Equations



Lorentz Transformations


The Attempt at a Solution


Before answering a, b and c, I actually need to understand this question. Here are my qualms:

1. If the part of the question in bold refers to observations from the platform frame, then I don't understand how the clocks can be synchronised. The clocks read 4:00 at different times(events).
what's the problem? This just means that the two clocks are simultaneously (in the frame of the platform) aligned with the front and back of the train.
That's all.

(this means that the distance between the two clocks (mesured in the frame of the platform) gives the length of the train as measured in the frame of the platform)

I don't understand your objection. The two events are different but they occur at the same time (in the frame of the platform). There is no problem with that.

Regards
 
neutrino said:
Before answering a, b and c, I actually need to understand this question.

I assume that a, b, and c all deal with quantities measured in the frame of the train.

Here are my qualms:

1. If the part of the question in bold refers to observations from the platform frame, then I don't understand how the clocks can be synchronised. The clocks read 4:00 at different times(events).

(Edit: As nrqed has said,) In the frame of the platform, the front passing clock 1 and the rear passing clock 2 are simultaneous events (i.e., they happen at the same time) that happen at different places in space.

2. If it refers to observations from the train, then it seems to me to be in contradiction with what the author says a few pages earlier. It is proved that given a pair of clocks, which are synchronised in a frame in which they are at rest, moving in the the same direction and separated in space, the leading clock lags behind the trailing one(the exact amound being Lv/c2, L- measured distance between clocks). If that is true, then howcome clock 1(leading clock) reads 4:00 before clock 2(trailing).

This applies to the times of the clocks as observed in the frame of the train, not as observed in the frame of the platform.

It might help to draw a spcetime diagram with, say, the platform frame unprimed and the train frame primed. In my diagram, I took clock 2 to be the spatial origin of the unprimed frame, and clock 1 to have a spatial position x = L. I took the back of the train to be at the spatial origin of the primed frame.

Now, draw a spacetime diagram that shows the worllines of clock 2, clock 1, back of train, front of train. What are the important events on this diagram?
 
*Slaps forehead* :redface:

I think this confusion arose because I numbered those clocks differently.

George Jones said:
In my diagram, I took clock 2 to be the spatial origin of the unprimed frame, and clock 1 to have a spatial position x = L. I took the back of the train to be at the spatial origin of the primed frame.

Put clock 1 at the origin of the platform frame and let the front end of the train, moving to the right, meet it at 4:00, and then you'll see why I was confused. :biggrin: Thanks, guys. Your help is much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K