How Do Sign Conventions Affect Calculations in Spherical Mirrors?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around optics, specifically the effects of sign conventions in calculations involving spherical mirrors and lenses. Participants are exploring focal lengths, image distances, and magnifications related to concave mirrors and equi-convex lenses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants present calculations for focal lengths and image positions based on given object distances. They question the correctness of their sign conventions and results, particularly regarding real and virtual images.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered calculations and reasoning, while others seek confirmation of their results. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of sign conventions on the outcomes of the calculations, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding sign conventions and their application in optics problems, indicating a need for clarification on these fundamental concepts.

alfredbester
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Doing an optics course I'm getting a bit confused about sign the conventions at time, can somebody check my answers here?

A spherical concave mirror of radius, R= 100mm has a real object placed at an axial distance So from its vertex.

Q1 Obtain the focal length of the mirror

1/ f = -2/R => f = -R/2 = -(-100mm)/2 = 50 mm right?

Q2 If an object is placed at a distance (i) Object distance, So = 200mm and then (ii) So = 20mm find the image positions, whether they are real or virtual and there magnifications.

(i) 1/Si = 1/f - 1/So = 1/50 - 1/200 = 150/10000 mm^-1. Si = image distance
M = -Si/So = -(10000/150 mm) / (200 mm) = -1/3

So the image is real, 67mm to the right of the mirror and is inverted and minified by a factor of 1/3.


(ii) 1/Si = 1/f - 1/So = 1/50 - 1/20 = - 30/1000 mm^-1
M = -Si/So = -(-1000/30 mm) / (20 mm) = 5/3

So the image is virtual, 33mm to the left of the mirror and is erect and magnified by a factor of 5/3.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Also.
An object is placed 5 cm from a thin equi-convex lens of focal length 4cm. Another thin equi-convex lens is placed on the same axis as the first and 9cm away from it, on the side further from the object. It has a focal length of 5cm.

(i) Find the position of the image. Is the image real

A: The image will be formed 3.475 cm to the right of lens 2 (therefore it's real ), or 17.475cm to the right of the object.

(ii) What are the magnifications of the intermediate and final image.

A: M(int) = -Si1/So1 = -(20cm)/(5cm) = -4
M(2) = -(Si2)/(So2) = -(55/16)/(-11) = 0.3125
M(tot) = M(int).M(2) = -1.25

Would appreciate somebody telling me it's all correct as well as pointing out any mistakes.
 
Bump. I take it nobody does optics then.
 
alfredbester said:
Hi,

Doing an optics course I'm getting a bit confused about sign the conventions at time, can somebody check my answers here?

A spherical concave mirror of radius, R= 100mm has a real object placed at an axial distance So from its vertex.

Q1 Obtain the focal length of the mirror

1/ f = -2/R => f = -R/2 = -(-100mm)/2 = 50 mm right?

Q2 If an object is placed at a distance (i) Object distance, So = 200mm and then (ii) So = 20mm find the image positions, whether they are real or virtual and there magnifications.

(i) 1/Si = 1/f - 1/So = 1/50 - 1/200 = 150/10000 mm^-1. Si = image distance
M = -Si/So = -(10000/150 mm) / (200 mm) = -1/3

So the image is real, 67mm to the right of the mirror and is inverted and minified by a factor of 1/3.


(ii) 1/Si = 1/f - 1/So = 1/50 - 1/20 = - 30/1000 mm^-1
M = -Si/So = -(-1000/30 mm) / (20 mm) = 5/3

So the image is virtual, 33mm to the left of the mirror and is erect and magnified by a factor of 5/3.

This looks right to me. the signs are ok. A quick check with a ray diagram agrees qualitatively with your results too. (it`s useful to know how to draw ray diagrams to check results like this).

Pat
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K