How do the laws of thermodynamics affect hydrogen on demand systems?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter october
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrogen Systems
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the laws of thermodynamics to hydrogen on-demand systems, specifically their inefficiency in improving vehicle fuel economy. The law of conservation of energy indicates that these systems cannot produce a net gain in energy, as losses in electrolysis and battery recharging negate any potential benefits. Users express skepticism about claims that hydrogen enhances fuel combustion efficiency, citing the lack of manufacturer adoption as evidence of ineffectiveness. Additionally, concerns are raised regarding the safety of handling both hydrogen and oxygen gases in these systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the laws of thermodynamics, particularly the law of conservation of energy
  • Basic knowledge of electrolysis and its role in hydrogen production
  • Familiarity with internal combustion engine mechanics and air-fuel ratios
  • Awareness of safety protocols for handling volatile gases like hydrogen and oxygen
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the efficiency and limitations of hydrogen on-demand systems in automotive applications
  • Explore the principles of electrolysis and its energy requirements
  • Investigate the design and operation of compressed natural gas (CNG) systems in vehicles
  • Learn about safety measures for handling and storing hydrogen and oxygen gases
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in alternative fuel technologies and their practical applications in vehicles.

october
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if someone could explain how the laws of thermodynamics apply to these so called hydrogen on demand systems and or how these laws govern the operations of these systems. Physics is my next college course but, I am not asking this for any assignments I have, just a personal interest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you thinking of products designed to be fitted to a car to improve mpg or allow your car to "run on water"?

They use electricity from the car battery to turn water into hydrogen (and oxygen) which is then burned in the engine where it turns back into "water".

The law of conservation of energy says there should be no net gain. In practice the power gain in the engine will be more than offset buy losses (eg in the alternator that recharges the battery, or in the electrolysis of the water).

However some people claim that the hydrogen doesn't just turn back into water in the engine. They claim it allows the fuel to burn more efficiently.

The fact that car manufacturers don't fit such systems as standard is proof they don't work.

It's also interesting to compare the rate of hydrogen production from these devices with the rate at which a carb sucks in air.
 
yeah, that was something else I didn't get. The rate a carb sucks in air. I have a 600 holley on my vehicle. It sucks in 600 cubic feet of air a minute. That's a lot of air, (I hope that's right, cubic feet and not inches) Either way, I have never seen an on demand system that could keep up with that. I did look at the CNG systems ford has. They use a specially designed tank that holds CNG at 3600 psi. In order to be efficient in running the vehicle, it has to be regulated down to 125 psi going into the engine. It also requires a special fuel rail (modification)attachment. For the good system you can set aside about 12000 dollars too. I would think the same would be true for the hydro gas too wouldn't it? Also in those "on-demand" systems, are they using both pure hydrogen gas and oxygen? Pure oxygen is pretty volatile itself. By their self both of those gases are explosive. If they are right then they should have two separate tanks, one to collect the hydrogen and one for the oxygen? I know pure hydrogen is as volatile as gasoline but, I've heard pure oxygen is worse. Sounds like dangerous stuff if the right precautions are not taken to control, compress and regulate these systems. Could explain all the mis-haps I've seen too...But hey they're trying. Maybe they need to start with re-designing the inefficient engine they are putting these on, that are designed to burn liquid fuel and not gas.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K