Physics How do theoretical physicists work?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of theoretical physics and the work of theorists today. It highlights the contrast between the romanticized image of solitary theorists, akin to Einstein, and the reality of collaborative work in modern research environments. Participants note that many theorists are involved in simulations and software development, often competing for supercomputer time, which suggests a shift in how theoretical work is conducted. A physics PhD student shares their experience of focusing on modeling phenomena using existing theories rather than creating entirely new theories. The conversation also touches on the misconception that theoretical physics is a distinct category separate from other physics disciplines, emphasizing that it is just one aspect of broader fields like condensed matter or high energy physics. There is a recognition that many students are drawn to theoretical physics due to its prominent figures, while the experiences of experimental physicists often go unexamined.
Robin04
Messages
259
Reaction score
16
I always imagine them sitting in their room behind their desks and working on their new theory like Einstein. I suppose most theorists work in groups nowadays to be more efficient but do these lonely workers still exist and are they supported financially or they're working in their free time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where I work they must be writing software all day because they are constantly competing with us for time on the supercomputer.
 
  • Like
Likes plasmon_shmasmon and Robin04
analogdesign said:
Where I work they must be writing software all day because they are constantly competing with us for time on the supercomputer.

Yeah, I run a lot of simulations, as do my colleagues. I don't really use the supercomputer, but other people do. FYI, I'm a physics PhD student.

I do a lot of hand-written derivations, but I'm not really creating new theories, so-to-speak. I'm trying to model particular phenomena using existing theories in different ways and sometimes I add insights or new things to an existing formalism. When I'm "deriving," mostly I'm trying to see if my work explains what I think it should and then see if it reduces to known results in limiting cases.
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21 and Robin04
You mean I'm supposed to work?
 
Dr. Courtney said:
You mean I'm supposed to work?

Theoretically, yes. :biggrin:
 
symbolipoint said:
Are "Theoretical Physics" and any other classification of Physics really so separate from each other?

No. In most disciplines in physics, "theoretical physics" is only one aspect of that discipline, i.e. theoretical condensed matter physics, theoretical high energy physics, theoretical accelerator physics, etc. It is just that, as I've stated before, many people seem to think that "theoretical physics" is a subject matter in itself.

I also see a lot of people, especially students just starting out, being "enamored" by doing "theoretical physics", since the popular characters in physics are usually theorists. Question like this is seldom asked of the rest of us, especially experimentalists, maybe because people think they know what we do, or what our days look like?

Little do they know!

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
5K
Back
Top