How do these equations cancel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter noahsdev
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the cancellation of denominators in two polynomial equations: \( f(x) = \frac{x^3+8}{x+2} \) and \( f(x) = \frac{x^3-27}{x-3} \). Participants are exploring the factorization and simplification of these expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss methods such as long division and synthetic division to simplify the equations. There is also exploration of factorization techniques, particularly for identifying factors of the numerator when the denominator results in zero.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on different methods for approaching the problem, including long division and synthetic division. There is an ongoing exploration of how to factor the polynomials and the implications of having zero in both the numerator and denominator.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of understanding the cancellation process and the need for clarity on polynomial factorization. The discussion includes considerations of coefficients and the relationships between terms in the equations.

noahsdev
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have the answer but I don't understand how they got it. What did they expand? These are the last two in the book but I can't understand how they canceled the denominator.
2. Equations
Equation 1:
f(x) = (x3+8)/(x+2)

Equation 2:
f(x) = (x3-27)/(x-3)

The answers are:
x2-2x+4
x2+3x+9

Thanks :).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi noahsdev! :wink:

you should be able to do this by long division (the same as in ordinary arithmetic) …

have a go :smile:

(alternatively, you should learn simple factorisations such as for x2 - a2 and x3 - a3)
 
For equation 1, if you plug in x=-2, you get 0 in the denominator, but you also get 0 in the numerator. This means that (x-(-2)) = (x+2) is a factor of the numerator because if you now plug x=-2 into the numerator, you'll once again get a value of 0. So you can factorize [itex]x^3+8=(x+2)(...)[/itex] , and we'll denote (...) by P(x)

Now, since the x+2 factor will cancel with the denominator, what you have left is P(x) which will be your answer.

To find out what that factor needs to be, you can either do long division as tiny-tim suggested, or you can do the following:

Since on the LHS we have a cubic, and on the RHS we have a linear factor multiplied by an unknown factor, that unknown must be a quadratic of course. So [itex]P(x) = ax^2+bx+c[/itex] for some constant a,b,c that we need to figure out. We can do better than this though! Since the coefficient of [itex]x^3[/itex] on the LHS is 1 and the constant is 8, then same must be true on the RHS. If we expanded [itex](x+2)(ax^2+bx+c)[/itex] we'd get [itex]ax^3+...+2c[/itex] where the ... includes terms of x2 and x.

So the coefficient of x3 on the LHS is 1, and the coefficient of x3 on the RHS is a, hence a=1.
The constant on the LHS is 8, and on the RHS it's 2c, so c=4. So right now we have

[tex](x+2)(x^2+bx+4)[/tex]

Which if you had some practice at doing, you'd be able to jump straight to this point.

Now to find b. We need to do some expanding for this and then equate coefficients. Since

[tex]x^3+8=x^3+0x^2+0x+8[/tex]

this means that the coefficient of x2 and x is 0 on the LHS so it must be on the RHS too.

Expanding [itex](x+2)(x^2+bx+4)[/itex] gives us

[tex]x^3+bx^2+4x+2x^2+2bx+8[/tex]

and factoring the x2 terms and the x terms gives us

[tex]x^3+(b+2)x^2+(4+2b)x+8[/tex]

So

b+2=0
b=-2

and we should also get the same answer for the coefficient of x,

4+2b=0
b=-2

Hence [itex]P(x) = x^2-2x+4[/itex] and that's our answer.

By the way, this method might look long and intimidating, but with practice it'll get easier and easier and you'll be able to skip all of the unnecessary steps such as expanding (x+2)P(x) completely and then comparing coefficients from there.

Personally, I haven't had to do long division in years because I always use this method over it, so I thought I'd give you that option as well if you prefer it.
 
Don't they teach synthetic division anymore? It's much quicker than your method or long division.

Code:
-2 | 1  0  0  8
   |[U]   -2  4 -8   
[/U]     1 -2  4  0

The coefficients of the quadratic are on the third line with remainder 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K