MHB How do we get the approximation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximation
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on approximating the derivative \( y'(t^n) \) using different methods, specifically the forward and backward Euler methods. The forward Euler method is derived from the difference quotient \( \frac{y(t^{n+1}) - y(t^n)}{h} \), while the backward Euler method uses \( \frac{y(t^n) - y(t^{n-1})}{h} \). There is a debate about whether to choose \( h \) as negative for the backward method, with a consensus that \( h \) should remain positive. The iterative process to find \( y(t^n) \) starts with an initial estimate and updates using \( y_{n}^{[i+1]} = y(t^{n-1}) + h f(t_{n}, y_{n}^{[i]}) \). This approach emphasizes the necessity of iteration to accurately approximate the derivative.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

Approximating $y'(t^n)$ at the relation $y'(t^n)=f(t^n,y(t^n))$ with the difference quotient $\left[\frac{y(t^{n+1})-y(t^n)}{h} \right]$ we get to the Euler method.

Approximating the same derivative with the quotient $\left[\frac{y(t^{n})-y(t^{n-1})}{h} \right]$ we get to the backward Euler method

$$y^{n+1}=y^n+hf(t^{n+1},y^{n+1}), n=0, \dots, N-1$$

where $y^0:=y_0$.
In order to find the formula for the forward Euler method, we use the limit $\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{y(x_0+h)-y(x_0)}{h}$ for $x_0=t^n, h=t^{n+1}-t^n$.
In order to find the formula for the backward Euler method, could we pick $h=t^{n-1}-t^n$ although it is negative?Or how do we get otherwise to the approximation:$$y'(t^n) \approx \frac{y(t^n)-y(t^{n-1})}{h}$$

?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
In order to find the formula for the backward Euler method, could we pick $h=t^{n-1}-t^n$ although it is negative?

Or how do we get otherwise to the approximation:

$$y'(t^n) \approx \frac{y(t^n)-y(t^{n-1})}{h}$$

?

Hi! (Wave)

We should still pick $h$ positive.
I previously explained to http://mathhelpboards.com/members/mathmari/ how to find that derivative in this thread. (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
Hi! (Wave)

We should still pick $h$ positive.
I previously explained to http://mathhelpboards.com/members/mathmari/ how to find that derivative in this thread. (Thinking)

Could you explain it further to me? (Thinking)
 
evinda said:
Or how do we get otherwise to the approximation:

$$y'(t^n) \approx \frac{y(t^n)-y(t^{n-1})}{h}$$

?

evinda said:
Could you explain it further to me? (Thinking)

Since we don't know $y(t^n)$ yet, we need to iterate to find it. (Thinking)

We start with an initial estimate:
$$y_n^{[0]} = y(t^{n-1})$$
And then we can iterate with:
$$y_{n}^{[i+1]} = y(t^{n-1}) + h f(t_{n}, y_{n}^{})$$
(Wasntme)
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
750
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
11K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
406