MHB How do we get the approximation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on approximating the derivative \( y'(t^n) \) using different methods, specifically the forward and backward Euler methods. The forward Euler method is derived from the difference quotient \( \frac{y(t^{n+1}) - y(t^n)}{h} \), while the backward Euler method uses \( \frac{y(t^n) - y(t^{n-1})}{h} \). There is a debate about whether to choose \( h \) as negative for the backward method, with a consensus that \( h \) should remain positive. The iterative process to find \( y(t^n) \) starts with an initial estimate and updates using \( y_{n}^{[i+1]} = y(t^{n-1}) + h f(t_{n}, y_{n}^{[i]}) \). This approach emphasizes the necessity of iteration to accurately approximate the derivative.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

Approximating $y'(t^n)$ at the relation $y'(t^n)=f(t^n,y(t^n))$ with the difference quotient $\left[\frac{y(t^{n+1})-y(t^n)}{h} \right]$ we get to the Euler method.

Approximating the same derivative with the quotient $\left[\frac{y(t^{n})-y(t^{n-1})}{h} \right]$ we get to the backward Euler method

$$y^{n+1}=y^n+hf(t^{n+1},y^{n+1}), n=0, \dots, N-1$$

where $y^0:=y_0$.
In order to find the formula for the forward Euler method, we use the limit $\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{y(x_0+h)-y(x_0)}{h}$ for $x_0=t^n, h=t^{n+1}-t^n$.
In order to find the formula for the backward Euler method, could we pick $h=t^{n-1}-t^n$ although it is negative?Or how do we get otherwise to the approximation:$$y'(t^n) \approx \frac{y(t^n)-y(t^{n-1})}{h}$$

?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
In order to find the formula for the backward Euler method, could we pick $h=t^{n-1}-t^n$ although it is negative?

Or how do we get otherwise to the approximation:

$$y'(t^n) \approx \frac{y(t^n)-y(t^{n-1})}{h}$$

?

Hi! (Wave)

We should still pick $h$ positive.
I previously explained to http://mathhelpboards.com/members/mathmari/ how to find that derivative in this thread. (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
Hi! (Wave)

We should still pick $h$ positive.
I previously explained to http://mathhelpboards.com/members/mathmari/ how to find that derivative in this thread. (Thinking)

Could you explain it further to me? (Thinking)
 
evinda said:
Or how do we get otherwise to the approximation:

$$y'(t^n) \approx \frac{y(t^n)-y(t^{n-1})}{h}$$

?

evinda said:
Could you explain it further to me? (Thinking)

Since we don't know $y(t^n)$ yet, we need to iterate to find it. (Thinking)

We start with an initial estimate:
$$y_n^{[0]} = y(t^{n-1})$$
And then we can iterate with:
$$y_{n}^{[i+1]} = y(t^{n-1}) + h f(t_{n}, y_{n}^{})$$
(Wasntme)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top