How Do We Know Gravity Is A Force?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mkcrow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of gravity, specifically questioning why it is considered a force that needs to be quantized. Participants explore the relationship between gravity, mass, and space-time, as well as the implications of quantizing gravity in the context of existing theories like quantum mechanics (QM) and general relativity (GR).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of quantizing gravity, suggesting that gravity may simply be a side effect of mass and space-time rather than a force that requires quantization.
  • Another participant references Einstein's perspective that gravitational attraction arises from matter's interaction with local space, highlighting Einstein's struggles to model this interaction.
  • A participant raises the question of the existence of the graviton, proposing that if physicists are confident in its existence, it would imply that gravity is a force.
  • One participant argues that the need to quantize gravity stems from the limitations of current theories, stating that QM and GR do not adequately describe the behavior of small heavy objects.
  • A participant expresses confusion over the thread's title and the focus on quantization, questioning whether the discussion should address both gravity as a force and its quantization separately.
  • Another participant asserts that gravity must be quantized because it affects particles, which are subject to quantum uncertainty, suggesting that gravity could behave differently than other bosonic forces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of quantizing gravity and the nature of gravity itself. There is no consensus on whether gravity should be classified as a force or simply a consequence of mass and space-time interactions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reveals limitations in the current understanding of gravity, particularly regarding the lack of a complete quantum theory of gravity and the unresolved nature of how gravity interacts with quantum objects.

mkcrow
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This is my first post here, and I hope it's not too stupid. This question has obsessed me for a while now.

Why is it necessary to quantize gravity? I am NOT a scientist, but I am fascinated by physics, and gravity seems to me to be a side effect of mass and space-time.

I don't understand why gravity is considered a "force" that must be quantized, rather than a result of mass itself.

Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Einstein thought that gravitational attraction (and inertial effects) were the result of matter's interaction with the local space in which it is embedded. He expressed this several times in the 1920's. He tried (and failed) for the rest of his life to uncover the mechanics by which this attraction could be modeled, and he was quite exasperated that the GR field equations were elevated to a status that he felt was uncalled-for compared to the gravitational effects they were intended to explain. Einstein was a pragmatist, and he felt that observable results ought to drive our perception of theory.

Michael Strauss (science spokesperson of the SDSS team) might be a good person to ask about the properties of quasars, and their redshifts, and metallicites, since the SDSS observations constrain any standard model of cosmology model out of existence.
 
Graviton

Maybe another question worth asking is how sure physicists are that the graviton exists. If they are quite sure there is a Graviton, I suppose that would suggest gravity is a force.
 
mkcrow said:
Why is it necessary to quantize gravity?

It's a simple matter: QM says how small light things behave, GR says how big heavy things behave, and neither existing theory tells us how small heavy things behave. So we're looking to combine the theories into a better one.
 
Oh, like neutron stars or compacted things like black holes. Okay, thank you for the reply. I will think about what you are saying.
 
mkcrow said:
Why is it necessary to quantize gravity?
Who told you that it is necessary to quantize gravity? That's a strong statement in light of the fact that there is no complete quantum theory of gravity yet.

What really puzzle's me is that the title you gave to this thread is How Do We Know Gravity Is A Force? but the question you really asked is about gravity being quantized. Which is it? Or do you want to address both questions separately and distinct? (e.g. answer the question in the title without the quantized thing since that means discussing quantum mechanics and this is a forum on classical relativity?)

Pete
 
Last edited:
Why quantize gravity?

Because it affects particles, and particles are subject to quantum uncertainty. If you consider a very small scale, the change in momentum must be due to a quantum kick, not a truly continuous action. Anything that affects the motion of the quantum object behaves that way, at least as far as the quantum object is concerned. If gravity turns out to be totally different then bosonic forces, then the graviton will at the very least show up as a quasi-particle, like plasmons and phonons do.

—John
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K